Cricket world cup discussion thread

India are 69/1 after 10.5 overs. Tendulkar gone. Complete mixup betweeen him and Sehwag. Tendulkar pushedthe ball to midwicker and set off for the single. Sehwag didn't move. Tendulkar was at the non strikers end when the keeper removed the bails. ( think donald and Klusener).

10.5
Abdur Razzak to Tendulkar, OUT, a huge wicket for Bangladesh, Sachin Tendulkar is gone after an amateurish mix-up, Tendulkar tucked the ball towards wide mid-on, Shakib at midwicket dived and intercepted it, Tendulkar had sets off for the run immediately, Sehwag was ball watching and didn't respond to the Tendulkar, Tendulkar was also ball watching so both batsmen end up at the same end, Shakib throws the ball to the keeper, who takes off the bails and the crowd go bonkers
SR Tendulkar run out 28 (29b 4x4 0x6) SR: 96.55

Gambhir is the new man in.
Second Power player has been taken. ( bowling).
 
Last edited:
Takes India only 1 over before they use the review system they hate so much.... and the umpires decision of not out stands... Malakies...
 
Takes India only 1 over before they use the review system they hate so much.... and the umpires decision of not out stands... Malakies...

They are rather at a big disadvantage here with udrs(through their own fault). Everyone else is now used to it but they have only used it once and then kumble was still captain.

Good win for india in the first game but bangladesh didn't bat badly, india's score was just way too much.
 
I like to see this 11 play in the first game vs West Indies.

Gream Smith
Hashim Amla
Morne Van Wyk (Wicketkeeper)
Jacques Kallis
AB de Villiers
JP Duminy
Faf Du Plessis
Johan Botha
Imran Tahir
Dale Steyn
Morne Morkel
 
A lot of the group games will be like that. WC only really starts at the quarters.
 
Why the fark were India using the referral system is they are so against it?

Sreesanth to Tamim Iqbal, no run, 137.9 kph, We have the first referral of the World Cup. Umpire Dharmasena has said not out to Sree's lbw appeal and Dhoni has referred it. Sree has bowled a monster of a yorker and it has swung in viciously as Tamim looks to get across and the n arrests the forward movement, pulls the foot back as it crashes into his toes, and falls over. Sree thinks it is plumb, but replays suggest it might have marginally missed leg stump. Banana swing on that, it swerved into line and then darted back to land on leg. Replays say it might have carried on down the leg, so India have lost one referral.
 
So do you think the ICC is actively trying to kill off the 50 over World Cup?

It's just far too long and it's going to be almost a week before we start seeing more evenly matched games. To start the tournament with a Bangladesh vs. India game was awful. The opening game of a World Cup should be a tustle to remember not that unmatched snoozefest.
 
So do you think the ICC is actively trying to kill off the 50 over World Cup?

It's just far too long and it's going to be almost a week before we start seeing more evenly matched games. To start the tournament with a Bangladesh vs. India game was awful. The opening game of a World Cup should be a tustle to remember not that unmatched snoozefest.
Hence the approved plan to reduce it to the top 10 teams next time round.
 
I like to see this 11 play in the first game vs West Indies.

Gream Smith
Hashim Amla
Morne Van Wyk (Wicketkeeper)
Jacques Kallis
AB de Villiers
JP Duminy
Faf Du Plessis
[-]Johan Botha[/-] Lonwabo Tsotsobe
Imran Tahir
Dale Steyn
Morne Morkel

Drop Botha, bring in Lopsy and you have balance in the bowling department.
 
They could easily cull 4 or 5 teams from the World cup. Think this has actually been discussed before. Kenya, Canada, Ireland and Netherlands need not be there, Zim and Bangladesh border line. The same issues exists with the Rugby world cup, too many teams simply making up the numbers. Should rather have 2 separate competitions with teams of equal or similar strength competing...
 
Hence the approved plan to reduce it to the top 10 teams next time round.

Makes sense to keep the teams evenly matched. Whitewashes will not draw the crowds or retain existing fans.
 
Top 10 teams, 1 pool, play each other once, top 4 teams play the best of 3 semi finals, top 2 contest a single final.. Or is that too many games?? The finalists would play a maximum of 13 matches. How many would the finalists play now in the current format?
 
mmm... currently the finalists would have played 9 matches...

EDIT: So 1 semi final, reduces the over all matches played to 11...
 
Makes sense to keep the teams evenly matched. Whitewashes will not draw the crowds or retain existing fans.
It also chases away TV audiences... I lost interest after the first 20 overs today. The earlier game was farcical; watched the first 5 Kenyan wickets fall and then switched off.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X