I understand your position, but it more in a concern with the current conditions:
1. Varsity clubs lock up players which can play elsewhere.
2. Where is the sponsors?
3. Too many clubs, some even share grounds.
4. No budgets to start with…
5. Unions expecting clubs to contribute $$$
Naturally you can still purchase players, but the Union will expect that the players are active.
In rugby, a club like Maties, also have Vics, both Super a League teams and a great mechanism to manipulate the log with players. Next year they extended the log to include 4 more teams, basically Super B got 4 teams promoted all the way down the league ladder. The Varsity teams will certainly have a surprise in concern with contenders, seeing that both Primrose and False Bay will be haunting their players, varsity have never played against teams like this.
http://www.iol.co.za/news/south-afr...-cape-club-rugby-match-1.1567716#.Urc13PQW3To
Once a club do not have the money to support their players, then they drop, Villager RFC being an example, this was a great club.
All the Union really want is the community players to be active within their clubs, to save money. Then, when you poach a coach, they normally take their key players with them...