Dave Grohl defends Grammy speech

MickeyD

RIP
Joined
Oct 4, 2010
Messages
139,095
Reaction score
432
Location
Nelson Mandela Bay
I fully agree with him... Some "artists" can no longer perform LIVE as they cannot come close to reproducing the sound as engineered/modified on their albums.

Los Angeles - Foo Fighters' frontman Dave Grohl was forced to defend his Grammy acceptance speech on Friday after numerous fans and critics interpreted his words as a critique of modern pop music.

"I love music. I love all kinds of music...Electronic or acoustic, it doesn't matter to me," Grohl said.

"The simple act of creating music is a beautiful gift that all human beings are blessed with. And the diversity of one musician's personality to the next is what makes music so exciting and ... human," added the Walk singer.

While the Foo Fighters won five awards at last Sunday's Grammy Awards, it was Grohl's acceptance speech for their best rock performance win that stirred viewers after the singer/songwriter said their latest album, Wasting Light, "shows that the human element of music is what's important."

"Singing into a microphone and learning to play an instrument and learning to do your craft, that's the most important thing for people to do. It's not about being perfect, it's not about sounding absolutely correct, it's not about what goes on in a computer.

"It's about what goes on in here [pointing to his heart] and what goes on in here [pointing to his head]," the singer had said on Sunday.

Critics slammed Grohl's comments with LA Weekly's Dennis Romero calling them "wrong on so many levels", citing the singer's former band, Nirvana's "decidedly retro style... endeared it to pop writers and music executives".

Grohl, who performed with electronica-dance DJ Deadmau5 at the Grammys on Sunday, defended his comments saying he was criticising the digital enhancement of fixing or perfecting music as removing "the human element" and not the pop or electronic-dance music genres.

"That thing that happens when a song speeds up slightly, or a vocal goes a little sharp. That thing that makes people sound like people.

"Somewhere along the line those things became "bad" things, and with the great advances in digital recording technology over the years they became easily "fixed," said the singer on Friday.

"A lot of music that sounds perfect, but lacks personality. The one thing that makes music so exciting in the first place."

http://www.channel24.co.za/News/International/Dave-Grohl-defends-Grammy-speech-20120217
 
I fully agree with him... Some "artists" can no longer perform LIVE as they cannot come close to reproducing the sound as engineered/modified on their albums.

BEP's spring to mind in this regard, their live sounds is dismal compared to their studio stuff
 
Agree with the man.

I do however disagree with this little bit though "The simple act of creating music is a beautiful gift that all human beings are blessed with." as I'm absolutely useless when it comes to making music!
 
Even artists like Avril Lavigne sounds terrible live, its not limited to pop. :erm:
Now on the other hand you get artists like Evanescence sound better live than recorded .
 
Even artists like Avril Lavigne sounds terrible live, its not limited to pop. :erm:
Now on the other hand you get artists like Evanescence sound better live than recorded .

Rock and metal generally sound better live. Avril Lavigne is pop btw, pop punk at best.
 
I agree with him, even though he is stating the obvious.
But i dont think people care, live performances are becoming more theatrical and more about the show than the actual musical talent.

Albums are being churned out with perfect vocals, spot on drums etc and thats what people are liking most of the time unfortunately.
 
ohk dont flame me but that adele chick's live concert was horrible. she sounded horrible. i couldnt believe it was the same chick that we have been listening to for months before that...
 
ohk dont flame me but that adele chick's live concert was horrible. she sounded horrible. i couldnt believe it was the same chick that we have been listening to for months before that...

Perfect example of what he (Grohl) meant.
A lot of these so called artists can't sing for a damn, but for studio enhancements
 
Perfect example of what he (Grohl) meant.
A lot of these so called artists can't sing for a damn, but for studio enhancements

Like watching glee...perfect everytime. If you can't sing acapella then you can't sing for me
 
Its quite sad that too many Artists can't actually be live acts... they all abuse autotune, even the ones that can sing... because its "cool" to have those effects in your song.

Its quite sad that we consider that music nowdays. I'm sorry... if you can't play your music live then its not something I want to listen to or waste my money on.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X