Dear Seacom,
I read that only 80 Gbps of bandwidth is currently available on the Seacom cable.
Are ISP's not really biting yet? Clients only using a small Percentage of the bandwidth?
I have a solution. you have the infrastructure now, now lets get ISP's to use it. want to know how? I'll tell you for free.
here goes:
Give some of that unused bandwidth to some ISP for cheaper - yep, donate it for free even, on the provision they WILL pass it on to customers.
what will happen is other ISP's will HAVE to jump in to compete with that, and start needing a slice/bigger slice of that Seacom pipe.
at the moment we all go on with our 2GB caps as normal - so ISP's don't even NEED to buy huge amounts of data at the moment...
Does seacom want it's very expensive cable to be used in little portions? won't they go bankrupt if all our ISP's combined, purchase and use only 10% of it's capacity for another 5 years?
IMHO they are the true players holding the key... they are in charge of their destiny in South Africa as well.
(a) They will either be a massive FAIL as costs can't be recovered, and go bankrupt. it's simple maths to figure if you spend 1 Billion Rand pipe but only make 1 million back a month. (not actual figures, just making a point)
or
(b) They can get all ISPs to start getting on with it already by sponsoring a few players for free/cheaper (provided it gets passed on to the customer) and get the other ISP's to NEED seacom. that's the keyword - NEED
Nobody NEEDS Seacom at this moment in time - all ISP's are in a stalemate - a "GridLock", and in a mode of "low usage" methods.
Seacom needs to break this Gridlock of low/no internet usage if it wants to be a sustainable business.
Thank you,
Keeper
I read that only 80 Gbps of bandwidth is currently available on the Seacom cable.
Are ISP's not really biting yet? Clients only using a small Percentage of the bandwidth?
I have a solution. you have the infrastructure now, now lets get ISP's to use it. want to know how? I'll tell you for free.
here goes:
Give some of that unused bandwidth to some ISP for cheaper - yep, donate it for free even, on the provision they WILL pass it on to customers.
what will happen is other ISP's will HAVE to jump in to compete with that, and start needing a slice/bigger slice of that Seacom pipe.
at the moment we all go on with our 2GB caps as normal - so ISP's don't even NEED to buy huge amounts of data at the moment...
Does seacom want it's very expensive cable to be used in little portions? won't they go bankrupt if all our ISP's combined, purchase and use only 10% of it's capacity for another 5 years?
IMHO they are the true players holding the key... they are in charge of their destiny in South Africa as well.
(a) They will either be a massive FAIL as costs can't be recovered, and go bankrupt. it's simple maths to figure if you spend 1 Billion Rand pipe but only make 1 million back a month. (not actual figures, just making a point)
or
(b) They can get all ISPs to start getting on with it already by sponsoring a few players for free/cheaper (provided it gets passed on to the customer) and get the other ISP's to NEED seacom. that's the keyword - NEED
Nobody NEEDS Seacom at this moment in time - all ISP's are in a stalemate - a "GridLock", and in a mode of "low usage" methods.
Seacom needs to break this Gridlock of low/no internet usage if it wants to be a sustainable business.
Thank you,
Keeper