MartyMarts
Spontaneous Interruption
- Joined
- May 16, 2006
- Messages
- 6,254
Property value, in the event that you default and they need to sell the property.
Yip. They won't go past what they think it's worth.
Property value, in the event that you default and they need to sell the property.
Property value, in the event that you default and they need to sell the property.
Yip. They won't go past what they think it's worth.
CoolLet us know how it goes later today?
Would they really value the house at R690k if they don't think I'll be able to sell it at that price again? Logic?
What is it worth now though? If you had to sell what would you list it at? Have you done any improvements to the property while you've been there. Banks seem to do estimate property valuations these days so if you feel it's worth more then they might be willing to send out someone to valuate it rather than just estimate against other similar properties in the area.
No one suggested that you rent, they said buy something cheaper instead.Thanks man. I did realise that as well, and that's why I bought. Renting is just throwing money in the water, as opposed to a house, which is an investment. Looks like we're the only 2 in this thread that realises it. And renting wouldn't have been that much cheaper, so I would almost be in the same situation.
It is already over 30 years though.
I just don't understand why the bank can't extend my loan by about 50k and make more money out of it, whilst totally resolving my situation. Last night I made some more calculations, and turns out I would actually be saving about R1.5k by being allowed to do this.
So I don't get why I should **** myself by selling and renting again, which would be a much worse situation long-term, just to resolve my short term woes, which could just as easily be resolved by the bank just actually trying to help me a bit better.
Anyhow, I have an appointment with the bank today, and I am determined to make them listen to me. I cannot accept that they are just flat out saying no to more money. It doesn't make business sense.
Thanks vampire.
Well, the big things we've done is perk up the garden so that it looks neater, and we painted the inner house a normal color, as opposed to the bright orange it was before, which I'm convinced brought down the selling price quite a bit, especially as some people might be too lazy to paint it again.
But I can think of more things to do, I still need to remove a tree that's preventing a section of grass to grow, and make sure that the grass actually grows there.
But not much else, really. It's a pretty small place to begin with.
So, in short, I think it's definitely not worth less than I bought it for.
EDIT: The reason the garden looked like sh*t before, is because the previous owner rented the place out, and the renters didn't give a damn.
No one suggested that you rent, they said buy something cheaper instead.
Also: A house you live in is usually NOT an investment. It's an asset, sure but it's only an investment if you make money on it. You do get something out of it when selling, so you don't lose all your money as with renting, but living in it yourself and paying only the minimum amount each month means that you will most probably not make a profit when selling
Would they really value the house at R690k if they don't think I'll be able to sell it at that price again? Logic?
Your bond may have been R690k, but you ended up paying a deposit. Why was this?
Either way- the need to consider the cost of selling the house on the open market at a reduced amount (and the subsequent administration fees), and lessening the shortfall to as little as possible.
I seriously need help now.
Basically, I have a home loan of R621k (Standard), and a personal loan of R74k (ABSA), which covered the deposit, and a bit more. The house price was R690k.
Now, before I started paying this, with the interest rate and the levy cost at the time, my salary was pretty much on the limit, I mean I knew I could afford it, and we have to knuckle down for 5 years, but it will get better with time.
However, then the interest went up twice in the last year, electricity went up quite a bit, and our levies went up R400 in the last 3 months, making my expendable income about R1.1k less than it was a year ago.
Thus, I went to Standard Bank and asked them if they could pay off the R61.7k remaining on the ABSA loan, and add it to my homeloan, as it would make business sense to them as well, as they would get more money from me in terms of interest, and I would pay less, and the only loser would be ABSA, which is really fine by me.
But, according to them, they can only up the bond's worth up to the original R621k, and pay out the amount that I've paid over to them in the last 15 months, which is about 12k after interest.
Surely there's another way, without re-paying bond registration etc.? How can I make this easier on both me and the wife? We seriously can't cut anywhere anymore - we don't even have DStv, never have, never will. Next things that will need to be cut, is insurance and medical aid, which is not ideal.
I really hope someone with experience in such a situation can give me something I can look at.
Thanks in advance.
It's very difficult to get 100% bonds now day so thats why he probably put the deposit down.
True, but they gave him a 30 year repayment period. While most will assume it's to do with the overall interest paid being greater, it is also used to improve affordability criteria.
They did initially give 20 years, but I thought better of it to extend it, since the extra money per month I had with this arrangement, would be a nice buffer, and that I would pay in any extra money I had left after the month was over, into this account anyway, so it was more flexible.
But now with a single income, and everything going up rapidly, it's getting tight.
Yeah, that's a big hit on you losing that additional income. And with it being already on a 30 year repayment period, you'd be hard-pressed to have them do more on this.