decent specs for battlefield

killadoob said:
so 2 gigs of 133 would load bf 2 and your pc would run slower than 512 ddr 400


come on you cant be serious?


Yip i would rather have 512 DDR 400 than 2 gigs of 133... Once the game is loaded and running, most of the game will be in memory and memory speed will be the only hurdle... But hey it would prob be hard to find 133 any more anyway.
 
http://gfx.importdirect.co.za -- Cheap Prices on GFX Cards

My system:
2500+ Barton, Radeon 9800 PRO 128MB, Abit Nforce 2, 1,5 GB DDR 400, SATA Drives. Run 1024x768 Medium detail. But thats what I'm used to all these years, so I don't want to run any higher.
 
killadoob said:
guys whether your ram is ddr amillion if you have not got enough of it your gonna suffa

the speed difference between 266 and 400 is minimal

a rig with 2 gigs pc 133 and 1 gigs 400 wont be that much faster but it will be faster

^^ noob talk
*ignore what you just read between the
 
why do you have a 43ms ping to your brothers house.. thats a lot!
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X