I highly suggest you read
this article before blaming the DA for the Chapman's Peak debacle.
And if all it takes some DA supporters to "simple stay away" from the polls is a darn road they clearly have no understanding about, then they deserve to live in an ANC-run mess, because if they think a toll road is going to be the height of their problems in an ANC-run Western Cape, then they've got something else coming to them...
r u siriaas. Load of tripe in that article. A 1st yr student could pick apart those articles in seconds.
Just a few:
1.
Motorists will be aware that except for a few short weather events, the pass has not been closed since the agreement was signed.
Why is that. Nothing has changed. If he found Intellini 'cheating' and closing the road for political/monetary gain they should immediately be removed with cause. This is a clear admission that this is the situation.
2.
The Cape Times describes the plaza as luxurious and massive. This also is incorrect.
Wrong again. They are building an office for : Plaza Managers Office, HR Manager office, Internal Auditor office, Secretary's office, Staff Room, Control Room, Cash Room, Archive/Records, Technicians Workshop, Civil Forman's Office, Store Room, Airconditioning Room, Workshop, Managers Office, PA to managers office, General Managers office, Store Room, Meeting Room, Kitchen, Service Room, and various Terraces. LUXURY IT DEFINITELY IS! wtf do they need terraces or an office for the frikken secretary? How many managers do they really need for a toll booth?
No, this is designed to be an asset instead of a functional structure. They will sublet this out for a packet.
3.
Construction is not happening at the expense of pristine fynbos, or any other protected fauna.
Complete lie. They excavated a pristine piece of land to create a quarry in SANPARK land to get the stone for construction work. Now they say the quarry is ugly and has no fynbos left, so we must build in it. Anyone can see the faulty argument here.
4,
"Free day pass to Chappies to be scrapped."
Carlisle himself has said the free pass is not in the agreement and can be scrapped at any time. Recall what the Entillini boss said about charging ambulances? You really think he's going to give out a free pass?!
5.
The legality of the approval to construct on the portion of SANParks land is being challenged, and is best left to the courts.
Why didn't they get that done first instead of signing an illegal contract. Now how much money is going to be spent on finding out if it can even be completed. He also says they will start building the part nearest the road, so we could end up with 1/2 an office. Not a thinking person is our MEC.
6.
Interestingly, the Hout Bay association, which now expresses such outrage about the plaza, did not object to the Record of Decision in its favour in 2005.
I believe they did, but at the same time were told it would have to take an act of parliament to do it, so presumably they were waiting for that.
7.
Setting aside fairy stories about luxury and parties, the vexed issue is whether the office area of the plaza could have been sited elsewhere. From an efficiency point of view this is undesirable. Toll offices are usually positioned close to a major toll gate, as at Huguenot
.
Meaningless arguments. It would obviously be far cheaper to site the office in Hout Bay. It doesn't need to be on site.
Fortunately he doesn't repeat his other really daft reasoning like the land is 0.0x% of available SANPARK land (nonsense stats101).
or the one about the offices will be better for the workers than the containers on site at the moment. (oh comon!)