South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
This is why we need facepalm emojisSeems we already have scientific evidence of alien technology.
Perhaps validation of what I heard on the broken radio about how some ET's are coming with meteors.
That we do.This is why we need facepalm emojis
Purple lizzid peeple?Well, there's an alien that has posted a response to this thread, so yes.
Trump built a long wall to keep the OTHER aliens out
This.
Building blocks for simple life seems to be everywhere and looking at our sample size of 1 (ie. Earth) we find simple life existing all over including in the harshest conditions.
So would be extremely likely to find microbes / fungi / etc common in the universe.
We also are only aware of carbon based life (ie. Us and everything else on planet earth) - who is to say there are elements out there we have not yet encountered, that could be the building blocks for a type of life we can't even conceive yet.
Space is big ... so incredibly big we as puny humans can barely comprehend the (observable) vastness of it all.
Would be rather egotistical to think in all that space we are the only ones.
I never proclaimed anything and life is by no means a simple thing if you consider how many millions years it took to make minor progressions; never mind complex multi-cell organisms.Oh really? And how did it start out exactly? We still don't know the answer to how life got started here on earth (if you're an evolutionist that is) yet you proclaim that it is a simple thing?
Even Dawkins admitted that it was possible that aliens seeded us on earth, BUT (and here he ruined his reputation) those aliens would have to have come from natural means. It's so deceitful it's a joke really.
The co-discoverer of DNA thought DNA was too well designed that he believed in directed panspermia.
I never proclaimed anything and life is by no means a simple thing if you consider how many millions years it took to make minor progressions; never mind complex multi-cell organisms.
We only have a sample size of one so it would be disingenuous to state anything with certainty - these are best guesses with the limited info right now.
Once we venture (if we ever do) into the universe we will hopefully get more concrete answers.
I remember a while back some physisist explained that 10% thing...
Look at stars in our galaxy that is the same as the sun. size, age etc... take 10% of those.
How many had planets that were the same as ours? in the Goldilocks band, distance from star. 10% again
They did quite a few of these 10% reductions.
With that calc they got a sum of planets that have a sun like ours, same temperature, have water, same size as earth blah blah blah. it was 42 000 or something.
There are 42 000 planets basically like earth, just in our galaxy. the odds of just us having life.. come on....
i can understand that we can work with what we know. carbon based, needs oxygen and water. the mere fact that we have at least 42 000 planets in our galaxy alone that does that cannot be ignored on the 'we are alone'.I think part of that human arrogance is that we assume that if there is anything else living in the universe, that it can only live if it’s in the exact same conditions as us. Who says that something else needs oxygen to breathe, for example? They could be thriving in a nitrogen-rich environment for all we know.
In the wild, a hungry angry lion... i'm gonna flick his nuts for him...Given the last 4 years, should we really be doing this? do we really wanna do it...