Do you believe aliens exist?

Do you believe aliens exist?

  • Yes

    Votes: 351 69.1%
  • No

    Votes: 105 20.7%
  • Other

    Votes: 52 10.2%

  • Total voters
    508
Base 8 are Octal numbers

Correct. But the digits are still Arabic numerals.

Arabic numerals are the ten symbols used for writing numbers: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9. They originated in India and were introduced to Europe through Arabic scholars around the 10th century, becoming the standard number system used worldwide today

Encyclopedia Britannica Wikipedia
 
I see their symbols in my minds eye. I see them externally when they abduct me, but it is sort of internal since they put me back in time when they return me from abduction.

The symbol was in white or green.

Won't do DMT. I heard it causes hallucinations of bugs on your body.

You don't need DMT.
 
I see their symbols in my minds eye. I see them externally when they abduct me, but it is sort of internal since they put me back in time when they return me from abduction.

The symbol was in white or green.

Won't do DMT. I heard it causes hallucinations of bugs on your body.

That's fascinating. Do you have your full story somewhere on the net, or are you willing to chat about it here?
 
Why don’t aliens visit Earth? Because it has only one star.

giphy.gif
 
Yes, but no longer in Belgium, where the last incursion was on November 9 after NATO took action.

Do you really think they are alien craft?
Not discounting anything. It's rather strange that no military had shot them down, not even the incidents in New Jersey back in November 2024.

Something is off for sure. Fox News, a US government mouthpiece has posted another article related to UAP. First time David Grusch appearing in an interview in over a year. He's the special task force UAP advisor.

Formerly an USAF officer and intelligence official with a degree in physics, has claimed US federal government and a aerospace companies has "above top secret" programs immersed in recovery and reverse engineering of non human space crafts, and their dead pilots. In addition, people have been murdered and threatened, including scientists, to prevent revealing evidence of these programs.

 
Not discounting anything. It's rather strange that no military had shot them down,

I've explained several times why the military cannot shoot anything down in a country not at war. You just ignore the explanations because you really, really, really want to believe they're alien craft.

Something is off for sure. Fox News, a US government mouthpiece has posted another article related to UAP. First time David Grusch appearing in an interview in over a year. He's the special task force UAP advisor.

He isn't:

David Grusch is a former United States Air Force officer and intelligence official who has claimed that the U.S. federal government, in collaboration with private aerospace companies, has highly secretive special access programs involved in the recovery and reverse engineering of "non-human" spacecraft and their dead pilots, and that people have been threatened and killed in order to conceal these programs

16245844521_ec440a4649_b.jpg


If he were in the US Air Force, his security clearance penalties for disclosure would remain active. Which means he is speaking absolute rubbish if he has not been arrested. Yet you fall for it. Have you ever had a security clearance? It remains active for life.

people have been murdered and threatened, including scientists, to prevent revealing evidence of these programs.

Name those people.
 
I've explained several times why the military cannot shoot anything down in a country not at war. You just ignore the explanations because you really, really, really want to believe they're alien craft.



He isn't:

David Grusch is a former United States Air Force officer and intelligence official who has claimed that the U.S. federal government, in collaboration with private aerospace companies, has highly secretive special access programs involved in the recovery and reverse engineering of "non-human" spacecraft and their dead pilots, and that people have been threatened and killed in order to conceal these programs

16245844521_ec440a4649_b.jpg


If he were in the US Air Force, his security clearance penalties for disclosure would remain active. Which means he is speaking absolute rubbish if he has not been arrested. Yet you fall for it. Have you ever had a security clearance? It remains active for life.



Name those people.
With all respect, that sounds like the sort of reply one gives when they’re already in on the cover-up
 
I've explained several times why the military cannot shoot anything down in a country not at war. You just ignore the explanations because you really, really, really want to believe they're alien craft.



He isn't:

David Grusch is a former United States Air Force officer and intelligence official who has claimed that the U.S. federal government, in collaboration with private aerospace companies, has highly secretive special access programs involved in the recovery and reverse engineering of "non-human" spacecraft and their dead pilots, and that people have been threatened and killed in order to conceal these programs

16245844521_ec440a4649_b.jpg


If he were in the US Air Force, his security clearance penalties for disclosure would remain active. Which means he is speaking absolute rubbish if he has not been arrested. Yet you fall for it. Have you ever had a security clearance? It remains active for life.



Name those people.

NATO has been trying to shoot the drones down.


David Grusch won't be arrested legally if he adheres to his NDA agreement. And that's why he hired a lawyer, to ensure he didn't reveal anything in contravention of his agreement. If he reveals the scientists names who were murdered or threatened, he's very likely in contravention of his agreement.

Boeing is one of the companies implicated in reverse engineering by anonymous whisteblowers. We know what happened to their two whisteblowers John Barnett and Joshua Dean, and it wasn't even UAP related.
 
He isn't:

David Grusch is a former United States Air Force officer and intelligence official who has claimed that the U.S. federal government, in collaboration with private aerospace companies, has highly secretive special access programs involved in the recovery and reverse engineering of "non-human" spacecraft and their dead pilots, and that people have been threatened and killed in order to conceal these programs



If he were in the US Air Force, his security clearance penalties for disclosure would remain active. Which means he is speaking absolute rubbish if he has not been arrested. Yet you fall for it. Have you ever had a security clearance? It remains active for life.



Name those people.
Exactly what this documentary is about.

 
With all respect, that sounds like the sort of reply one gives when they’re already in on the cover-up

Asking for evidence means a cover up? Have you read the thread yet, or did you jump in to comment?
 
I see their symbols in my minds eye. I see them externally when they abduct me, but it is sort of internal since they put me back in time when they return me from abduction.

The symbol was in white or green.

Won't do DMT. I heard it causes hallucinations of bugs on your body.
Do it!

Stay off the brewed kak. Not lekker puking and shitting yourself while you're trying to have a nice trip. You can do the vape with minimal bad effects. It's shorter, but you don't need much time with the "main dude". Besides, a quick chat with him, and you'll likely not be bothered by the 8 fingered guys again.
 
NATO has been trying to shoot the drones down.


That's a book promotion, not an authoritative article. If NATO has shot down drones over their own territory and you know it for a fact, you will be able to provide:

Place.
Date and time.
Drone type.
Method used.

David Grusch won't be arrested legally if he adheres to his NDA agreement.

There is no NDA agreement inherent in a security clearance. Anything classified cannot be revealed until the classifier declassifies it. Do you know the criteria for the levels of security classification?

that's why he hired a lawyer, to ensure he didn't reveal anything in contravention of his agreement.

Which means he has to reveal state secrets to his lawyer. That would be in contravention of a security clearance unless his lawyer is also security cleared, which he won't be, as security clearance is subject to 'need-to-know' constraints. Just because you have a secret clearance does not mean that every secret document is available to you. Only secrets you are involved with are available to you. Tell me you have never had a security clearance?

Boeing is one of the companies implicated in reverse engineering by anonymous whisteblowers.

What did Boeing reverse engineer?


What's the relevance of this abstract regarding an unproven conjectural modelling hypothesis? If you read the thread you will find the statistical probability of life existing elsewhere has been discussed already.
 
What's the relevance of this abstract regarding an unproven conjectural modelling hypothesis? If you read the thread you will find the statistical probability of life existing elsewhere has been discussed already.
I thought you might find it an interesting read re: statistical probability etc .. seeing as it differs too your views
 
That's a book promotion, not an authoritative article. If NATO has shot down drones over their own territory and you know it for

There is no NDA agreement inherent in a security clearance. Anything classified cannot be revealed until the classifier declassifies it. Do you know the criteria for the levels of security classification?

This is still ongoing, it has been for the last decade or so, there has been two Congressional hearings about it now.

Surely you've must of heard about AATIP and AARO, and people like David Fravor, Luis Elizondo, Christopher Melon, Jay Statton, Ryan Graves before ?
To name a few...

Link:
https://www.theguardian.com/film/2025/nov/22/age-of-disclosure-documentary-aliens
 
That's a book promotion, not an authoritative article. If NATO has shot down drones over their own territory and you know it for a fact, you will be able to provide:

Place.
Date and time.
Drone type.
Method used.



There is no NDA agreement inherent in a security clearance. Anything classified cannot be revealed until the classifier declassifies it. Do you know the criteria for the levels of security classification?



Which means he has to reveal state secrets to his lawyer. That would be in contravention of a security clearance unless his lawyer is also security cleared, which he won't be, as security clearance is subject to 'need-to-know' constraints. Just because you have a secret clearance does not mean that every secret document is available to you. Only secrets you are involved with are available to you. Tell me you have never had a security clearance?



What did Boeing reverse engineer?



What's the relevance of this abstract regarding an unproven conjectural modelling hypothesis? If you read the thread you will find the statistical probability of life existing elsewhere has been discussed already.
Interesting. I did more searching and besides Nato, Poland has shot down drones.


Lithuania authorises army to shoot down drones.


NATO itself has not managed to shoot down drones yet.

Have to reiterate that UAP's should still be a consideration as newly released UK police logs have just come to light regarding one of November last year's drone incidents.


Grusch's attorney is Charles McCullough III and he's a former Inspector General of US Intelligence Community. Grusch reported his findings to ICIG, so it's obvious the Inspector General has the necessary clearance. Members keep their clearance unless they've done something drastic. We've discussed this previously on the topic of Bob Lazar.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X