RedViking
Nord of the South
constantly

South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
constantly

I call horseschit. Substantiate this claim with a credible source.Life has already been found on mars. It was mistaken back when the first rover landed but has been confirmed since.
He typed from his electronic device connected to a ubiquitous planetary network designed for the intercontinental exchange of information in less than a second.Show me that intelligent life exists on this planet then I'll start to consider the possibility that it exists elsewhere in the universe.
and we wonder why they avoid us...Na, pope already said he'll just baptize them into christianity![]()
They will most likely have their own gods. We'll try and convert them and they'll try and convert us.and we wonder why they avoid us...
If they're capable of getting all this way to meet us I doubt they'll believe anything nearly as insane as most of our religions push.They will most likely have their own gods. We'll try and convert them and they'll try and convert us.
Only if they're backward stone-age types. If they've grasped the elements of reason they'll understand the ontological arguments and we'll agree on First Cause/Prime Mover, ie existence and nature of Almighty God - that's a matter of pure reason, not revelation and belief.They will most likely have their own gods. We'll try and convert them and they'll try and convert us.
How do you arrive at God (and his nature) by pure reason?existence and nature of Almighty God - that's a matter of pure reason, not revelation and belief.
Not the place to get into that debate. If you're interested, here's a recently-published beginner's summary for your own reading.How do you arrive at God (and his nature) by pure reason?
Or is this bait....
Not the place to get into that debate. If you're interested, here's a recently-published beginner's summary for your own reading.
It could go any direction, peaceful or not. I do think dough that itis highly unlikely for them to be atheists as that is a very unnatural position to take.Only if they're backward stone-age types. If they've grasped the elements of reason they'll understand the ontological arguments and we'll agree on First Cause/Prime Mover, ie existence and nature of Almighty God - that's a matter of pure reason, not revelation and belief.
Rationally speaking there can only be one first cause. Period.Which God or just a God?
I understand. But who is it?Rationally speaking there can only be one first cause. Period.
Speaking to humans, his own name for himself is "The One Who Is". In other words, the only being that does not have contingent existence, who has existence as part of his essence, who just IS. Everything else we encounter is contingent, requiring a further account of its existence.I understand. But who is it?
Rationally speaking, "I don't know" is the more reasonable answer.Rationally speaking there can only be one first cause. Period.
Do we talk to him? Does he talk us?Speaking to humans, his own name for himself is "The One Who Is". In other words, the only being that does not have contingent existence, who has existence as part of his essence, who just IS. Everything else we encounter is contingent, requiring a further account of its existence.
I know in exactly the same way that I know the sum of the internal angles of a plane triangle is exactly 180 degrees. Precisely, to the atom. Not a smidgeon less or more. Even if I never encounter such a triangle in the physical world in order to verify/measure it. It is axiomatic. Same as the existence of the first cause.Rationally speaking, "I don't know" is the more reasonable answer.
That you think reason gets you to God, let alone the particular one you believe in is absurd.
Yes. For us to know who God is he should have revealed himself to us in the past.Do we talk to him? Does he talk us?
I can make the same such conflationary assertion about my belief in unicorns. Reason isn't getting me to unicorns, but rather a giant leap.I know in exactly the same way that I know the sum of the internal angles of a plane triangle is exactly 180 degrees. Precisely, to the atom. Not a smidgeon less or more. Even if I never encounter such a triangle in the physical world in order to verify/measure it.