Do you think the lockdown curfew serves a purpose?

Do you think the lockdown curfew serves a purpose?

  • Yes

    Votes: 139 33.1%

  • No

    Votes: 281 66.9%
  • Total voters
    420
dabbler said:
Unfortunately no-one knew exactly what was about to be inflicted on us. We didn't need to happen to us what happened during the Spanish flu epidemic where millions died. The obvious safest route to take was complete lockdown.
Click to expand...
What is a complete lock down? Whatever it is how would you determine it to be the safest route? I mean once you've thought about it a little and realised it isn't at all obvious.
 
I live on a main road , people up and down all the time some properly drunk to , wast of time the Flu is nearly over .
Couple of shibeens down the road been brewing and selling .
 
Another one of these obvious answer surveys :p

The curfew serves no purpose. We're not children and the state is not our nanny. If they can prove something with real science and not NDZ "science", then sure...but that's not what happened.
 
Living in the ghettos, it has made a huge difference as there is less foot traffic in around my house
 
In my opinion, no. We were recently burgled during curfew hours. So much for that.
 
Changed my vote to Yes after reading the question properly. Of course it serves a purpose. The purpose is to make people more used to the totalitarian actions by the government. People are willingly giving up their rights out of irrational fear all over the world, and the ANC is taking advantage.
 
Well it reduces crime for one, and it has been well documented that crime has dropped during the lock down period. However, as more people lose their jobs due to the anc miserable failure to govern like a proper civilized government, and instead choose to enrich themselves without any consequences, those people will turn to crime and it will be done because our courts are flooded with bullshit cases and if you just flash a anc membership card, they activate your "get out of jail" card for you.
 
Communist Control.
So the fat asses can steal more.
 
rpm said:
Do you think the lockdown curfew serves a purpose?
Click to expand...
Depends on how you look at it. From the perspective of those wanting to gain advantage then the answer is yes - it is a means to control and manipulate.
If we are talking from the perspective of managing the "pandemic", first we have to establish if there is actually a pandemic or if what we are going through right now can be classified as such. If we look at the numbers and the data - which is extensive - there is very little to suggest that there is justification for COVID being classified as a pandemic. The collateral damage that has occurred as a result of the overreaction / manipulation is orders of magnitude greater than the threat presented by the virus itself, which raises questions as to whether our "leaders" are actually that incompetent or if there is more going on.
If we accept (for discussions sake) that there is a threat then the question is - does a lock down do anything to mitigate this threat. The data on this seems to indicate an overwhelming no - zero effect - if any effect is observed it is in the other direction - negative.

The events of this year will probably go down in history as the biggest man made disaster and fraud ever committed by sentient beings.

It has some benefits - it has, to a certain extent, exposed the manipulation of government, media, money, social media - that has always been prevalent but insidiously hidden. There has been some gains in population awareness but for the most part the reaction by the MITS has been sorely disappointing. The level of support of lock down, masks and the mainstream narrative is a sad indictment on the people of the 21C.
 
Method said:
Another one of these obvious answer surveys :p

The curfew serves no purpose. We're not children and the state is not our nanny. If they can prove something with real science and not NDZ "science", then sure...but that's not what happened.
Click to expand...

More like we not children but reserve the right to act like it.

It’s a global problem with modern, lack, of parenting the cause.
 
dabbler said:
Unfortunately no-one knew exactly what was about to be inflicted on us. We didn't need to happen to us what happened during the Spanish flu epidemic where millions died. The obvious safest route to take was complete lockdown.
Click to expand...
Why obvious? It is unprecendented - no data to support that a lock down works so why obvious? The obvious route was to shield the vulnerable. We knew very very early on what the nature of this thing was - the Diamond Princess gave us a perfect laboratory environment - it told us infection rates, mortality rates and who was most vulnerable - yet it was ignored - for political reasons. No, it was not obvious - there was zero data to support it and extensive growing data against it (from day 1).
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X