E-tolling a confusing, hasty drive

daveza

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 5, 2004
Messages
49,755
Reaction score
21,498
Location
Durbanville, Cape Town
http://www.iol.co.za/business/business-news/e-tolling-a-confusing-hasty-drive-1.1281566


TAXIS are exempt, but not private ambulances or off-duty police in their official vehicles.

Days before e-tolling starts in Gauteng, the government has produced draft regulations to sort out who is exempt from paying tolls. Most of the regulations focus on taxis.

But the regulations won’t be ready before tolling starts next Monday.

The draft regulations were finally issued last week and, despite The Star having asked both the SA National Roads Agency Ltd (Sanral) and the Department of Transport earlier in the week about the apparent failure to legalise the taxi toll exemption, neither mentioned it.

The department has set 20 days for public comment – a shorter period than usual – and the regulations will then have to be finalised, so this means the e-tolls start without the exemption in place.

It is only state-owned ambulances and firefighting vehicles that are exempt from e-tolls – meaning private ambulance services must pay.

Marked police vehicles used by the SAPS, provincial traffic officers and municipal police of Gauteng, Joburg, Tshwane and Ekurhuleni are exempt “while on official duty in their official capacity”, when the vehicles are owned or leased by Gauteng or those municipalities.

The regulation is confusing as it appears to include the SAPS, but limits the vehicles to those owned by the province or three metros.

The exempted ambulances and firefighting vehicles must be marked, on official duty, and owned by Gauteng or the metros of Joburg, Tshwane or Ekurhuleni.

It’s not clear how Sanral would know which police or ambulances will be on official duty and which not.

Public transport vehicles which may be exempted include taxis, buses and “scheduled commuter public transport” like scholar taxis and private contract transport. The public transport exemption is only for those whose officially registered routes include toll roads.

Those who want the exemption and qualify for it must register with Sanral and get an e-tag. Applications must include an unspecified fee (not refunded if the application fails).

Public transport exemption applications must also include operating licences, permits, timetables, route details and vehicle licences.

Emergency vehicle owners who want exemptions must provide Sanral with proof of its ownership or leasing.

The hurriedly written piece of law also adds definitions of “e-tag”, “e-toll plaza” and “GFIP toll roads” that Sanral forgot before.

The Justice Project SA’s Howard Dembovsky said:

“It is pertinent to note that should e-tolling go ahead on April 30, there will be no exemption mechanism in place at the launch.”

So there is no database of taxis on their system - and all taxis must purchase an e-tag.

Chances of taxis registering and providing all the required details by the end of the week - zero.
 
The hurriedly written piece of law also adds definitions of “e-tag”, “e-toll plaza” and “GFIP toll roads” that Sanral forgot before.

Forgot? They just .......... forgot?? They are drafting legislation w.r.t e-tolling and they FORGOT to define the terms? Who drafted this **** for them? A school child?????
 
Forgot? They just .......... forgot?? They are drafting legislation w.r.t e-tolling and they FORGOT to define the terms? Who drafted this **** for them? A school child?????

A school child will fair a lot better than most of the palookas in gov't!
 
This is actually a very sneaky move to get information on taxis. Now they know how many taxis are using the highways, and which routes they drive. With the e-toll system, they could also guesstimate the number of times a taxi drives a route, and work out average income, and thus taxes.
 
Well, when / if I get an invoice I will just say I am a taxi - they will have to spend time and money showing I am not. If found out - I will just apologise :D
 
It seems to me that if everyone who does not register, gets an invoice/bill/whatever-they-call-it for driving on an e-toll road, and then simply contest it, SANRAL will be inundated and unable to cope with it all. It will take at least 6 months to deal with each such issue and they will be collapsing under the administrative pressure.
 
It seems to me that if everyone who does not register, gets an invoice/bill/whatever-they-call-it for driving on an e-toll road, and then simply contest it, SANRAL will be inundated and unable to cope with it all. It will take at least 6 months to deal with each such issue and they will be collapsing under the administrative pressure.

The point is that if you do register you cannot contest any charges.
 
Why do we have to register if their software can pick it up? Is it to make us agree to t&C's we do not want to?
 
What makes me mad is that the SPCA applied for exemption and SANRAL denied their application!
 
The hurriedly written piece of law also adds definitions of “e-tag”, “e-toll plaza” and “GFIP toll roads” that Sanral forgot before.

They forgot to forget about "e-roads" as well.

I plan to add to their mess by not getting an e-tag but I'll still drive on the hiways. I'll call it an e-fsck-you!
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X