F1 2022

Status
Not open for further replies.
Jean Claude Vaaldamme said:
There are many rumors and if true things may not turn out well for Checo.
Click to expand...
Why? The Monaco thing could be a bunch of nonsense. Assume it is true though, RB didn't do anything then so why would they doing anything now? If anything it just shows Max to be an even bigger dick. He's ok with accepting positions from a "cheater" but then acts like a child when asked to give it back.

biggus-dickus.gif
 
quovadis said:
Why? The Monaco thing could be a bunch of nonsense. Assume it is true though, RB didn't do anything then so why would they doing anything now? If anything it just shows Max to be an even bigger dick. He's ok with accepting positions from a "cheater" but then acts like a child when asked to give it back.

View attachment 1422369
Click to expand...
You still haven't told me why Hamilton did not do the honorable thing and give second place back to Max the last race?
You keep giving stupid fanboy arguments and then don't acknowledge when you wrong.
I really don't know if he accepted favors after Monaco, please give us the info you seem to have.
 
Jean Claude Vaaldamme said:
You still haven't told me why Hamilton did not do the honorable thing and give second place back to Max the last race?
You keep giving stupid fanboy arguments and then don't acknowledge when you wrong.
I really don't know if he accepted favors after Monaco, please give us the info you seem to have.
Click to expand...
You didn't ask me so have no idea what honorable thing you're referring to. As for "favours" Checo has obeyed team orders for the benefit of Max time and time again.

But the issue still remains - if you take a position on the proviso that you'll give it back and if you cannot get past Alonso - you don't take the gifted position if you don't intend to honor it. Checo obeyed team orders, Max didn't. Dick move.
 
quovadis said:
You didn't ask me so have no idea what honorable thing you're referring to. As for "favours" Checo has obeyed team orders for the benefit of Max time and time again.

But the issue still remains - if you take a position on the proviso that you'll give it back and if you cannot get past Alonso - you don't take the gifted position if you don't intend to honor it. Checo obeyed team orders, Max didn't. Dick move.
Click to expand...
You said Max is a (whatever swear/insult you Merc boys like to use) as he did not do the right thing and give the title back that he did not deserve. So I asked why did Hamilton not give back the second place from Brazil as everyone said Max should not have gotten a penalty. The same scenario as the stupid one you made up.

Every team lets a faster teammate by. Thats not helping whoever, its most of the time just different strategies. No reason to fight your own teammate that is faster.
Except Ferrari. They and Tortoise Sainz will always keep their only good driver behind
 
Jean Claude Vaaldamme said:
You said Max is a (whatever swear/insult you Merc boys like to use) as he did not do the right thing and give the title back that he did not deserve.
Click to expand...
No I didn't say that.
Jean Claude Vaaldamme said:
So I asked why did Hamilton not give back the second place from Brazil as everyone said Max should not have gotten a penalty. The same scenario as the stupid one you made up.
Click to expand...
You are unable to discern the difference between 1) a penalty as per sporting code and 2) the sporting code not being adhered to? You think that's the same scenario?

Jean Claude Vaaldamme said:
Every team lets a faster teammate by. Thats not helping whoever, its most of the time just different strategies. No reason to fight your own teammate that is faster.
Except Ferrari. They and Tortoise Sainz will always keep their only good driver behind
Click to expand...
There are plenty of examples where team mates have swapped positions on a proviso and they honor that proviso as per team orders. That's not the same as just saying let someone by with no proviso.
 
quovadis said:
You are unable to discern the difference between 1) a penalty as per sporting code and 2) the sporting code not being adhered to? You think that's the same scenario?
Click to expand...
I will say it again. The FIA stated that there was no malicious intent with RB going over the cost cap. I stand corrected, but that was the first year this cost cap was introduced. So there is every chance that teams could misinterpret a few things. If there was any chance the FIA thought that RB got any advantage, they would have given them a harsher penalty. If the FIA decided to give Rd Bull a harsher penalty on a misinterpretation of the new rules, RB would probably take them to court, that why RB took a strong stance because they knew they had a good case probably.

AS for the 'Human error". Why did Merc not take this to court? Even before the FIA statement?
Do you think that its plausible that there could be no evidence that Masi was wrong and they just gave him a fat paycheck to take the fall, with a clause that he may not say anything while sipping Pina Coladas on an island? I mean we all know what's going on in the world, the FIA don't want further bad press from the cancel culture?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X