Hamster
Resident Rodent
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2006
- Messages
- 45,933
- Reaction score
- 18,426
I wanted to do the exact same thing
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
I wanted to do the exact same thing
I can tell you, but it won't be pretty: we don't fly cattle class, we don't do cheap hotels/Airbnb, and we don't do grandstands.Did @Naks told us what Air travel and race stuff cost?
I can tell you, but it won't be pretty: we don't fly cattle class, we don't do cheap hotels/Airbnb, and we don't do grandstands.
All told, this Singapore GP cost us +- R400k. But you can easily do it for 1/10th of this p.p if you buy the Pentravel-type packages.
Sounds like he's trying to suck up!
Seems to be some drama unfolding regarding budget caps and RB
The important bit is that RB may have as well.Sounds like he's trying to suck up!
And if AMR did break the budget cap, then they clearly researched the wrong things as they sucked!
That is correct. Cannot wait for the Hamilton fans who joined F1 in 2021 to start bleating again.The important bit is that RB may have as well.
Agreed, it's a team thing.That is correct. Cannot wait for the Hamilton fans who joined F1 in 2021 to start bleating again.
The team should be punished, not the drivers. They'd have nothing to do with that breach. And I mean all 4 drivers of both teams.
Superior logic thereThat is correct. Cannot wait for the Hamilton fans who joined F1 in 2021 to start bleating again.
The team should be punished, not the drivers. They'd have nothing to do with that breach. And I mean all 4 drivers of both teams.
It'd be hard to argue the drivers didn't benefit from the spending.Agreed, it's a team thing.
Definitely, but ultimately the drivers don't set the budget or plan the spending and the constructors are competing in the constructor's championship so it's in their interest as a team whereas the driver is simply the driver.It'd be hard to argue the drivers didn't benefit from the spending.
Almost like saying the drivers are not part of the teamIt'd be hard to argue the drivers didn't benefit from the spending.




They drove the car and are part of the team.Definitely, but ultimately the drivers don't set the budget or plan the spending and the constructors are competing in the constructor's championship so it's in their interest as a team whereas the driver is simply the driver.
Dude, have you checked Twitter? I've blocked so many "F1 fans" who only seem to spew hate and sh)t there. NOW, the Formula1 Twitter page is so much nicer.Superior logic there![]()
Definitely. Don't just punish VW for Dieselgate, punish the workers who helped assemble all those diesel engines.They drove the car and are part of the team.
NETFLIX are still scripting them, we will find out at the end of the yearAnyone know what those formal processes are?
Doubling down on that superior logic.Definitely. Don't just punish VW for Dieselgate, punish the workers who helped assemble all those diesel engines.
What was it again..."superior logic there"...?![]()
Again...using the analogy I put forward to the quovadis guy: VW sold a lot of their diesel engined cars based on falsified numbers. So why punish VW alone? Punish the workers who assembled the engines.The trouble is this is huge money. At what point is it just "cheating to get ahead" and outright fraud. Not the drivers fault, but if they benefitted from the company cheating. Funny enough the last big one by a team that I recall was Benneton in 1994 - Jos was driving for them at the time when his car caught fire, triggering the investigation into their refuelling setup.