quovadis
Honorary Master
Yea exactly.
Besides the obvious affects on the results, I'm more just curious about the testing methodology.
3.5.9 is a good starting point.
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Yea exactly.
Besides the obvious affects on the results, I'm more just curious about the testing methodology.
Agree, would take it further and say everyone should be tested. Who knows how many other DQs there could be which would affect the result...At the very least check George and Carlos as well....
"Red Bull wind tunnel set back - things are not going to plan for Red Bull's new wind tunnel in Milton Keynes, UK. The team has withdrawn its planning application for the new facility. Which means there is no chance of construction starting soon (mini thread)
#F1 #RedBullRacing"
"It also means that any new wind tunnel for the team would not be much use on the 2025 car, and would be a push to realistically have it in use for much meaningful development on the Ford powered 2026 car. The team will continue with its 75 year old tunnel at Twinwoods, UK for now"
McLaren need a new strategy team...
FFS man, they should have put Lando on the mediums!
They didn’t have new mediums left. They went into the race with 2 new hards and 1 new medium while most other front runners had 2 mediums and 1 new hard
Every time I read this I kots a littleFord powered
This is such a disingenuous statement. Technically true, maybe. I don't think so. But it's so misleading.
"According our data Lewis Hamilton lost between 6-9 seconds due to strategy; Mercedes was faster than Red Bull. Leclerc could have shown a good pace, he missed a ‘virtual’ podium due to the ineffective strategy"
This is such a disingenuous statement. Technically true, maybe. I don't think so. But it's so misleading.
Max had brake issues and Checo is ****. So technically yes, but in reality, if Max's car wasn't broken, it would have been another 30s lead. And if Lewis' car wasn't too low, he wouldn't have been as fast.