F1 2024

Status
Not open for further replies.
Unbelievable... how on Earth did Claire Williams allow the rot to set in so deep!?

I don't think Claire was the best team principle. She just took over when Frank was no longer there mentally. Towards the end, Frank was more of a symbolic presence at races.
 

The F1 Driver Academy managing director, who is wife of Mercedes team boss Toto Wolff, found herself at the centre of a media storm in December after the FIA announced it was looking into a potential conflict of interest between them.

This followed a media report suggesting that confidential information had been shared between the pair, and that teams had complained to the FIA. Both these counts were subsequently strongly denied.

The matter emerged in public after the FIA issued a statement saying that: “The FIA is aware of media speculation centred on the allegation of information of a confidential nature being passed to an F1 team principal from a member of FOM personnel. The FIA Compliance Department is looking into the matter."

While the Wolffs were not named in the statement, it was obvious who the governing body was referring to, and their identify was also briefed to media.

But, in the wake of a huge backlash over the matter, which included all nine of Mercedes’ rivals stating they had not complained to the FIA, the governing body quickly backed down.

Just 48 hours after its initial statement, it said the matter was closed as there was no case to answer – and that things did not even warrant a formal investigation.

That climbdown was not enough for Susie Wolff, in particular, who felt that there had already been huge reputational damage done by the FIA in electing to go public in stating that it was even assessing the matter.

Writing on social media at the time, she said: “I might have been collateral damage in an unsuccessful attack on somebody else, or the target of a failed attempt to discredit me personally, but I have worked too hard to have my reputation called into question by an unfounded press release.”

There has also been intrigue about the source of the original media report that triggered the FIA’s action in the first place, and whether it had come from within the governing body itself.

With no public apology from the FIA over its handling of what took place, Susie Wolff has taken the next step in going to the French courts in a bid to get to the bottom of the aspersions that were cast.

In a social media post issued ahead of the Australian Grand Prix, she said: “I can confirm that I have personally filed a criminal complaint in the French courts on the 4 March in relation to the statements made about me by the FIA last December.

“There has still not been any transparency or accountability in relation to the conduct of the FIA and its personnel in this matter.

“I feel more than ever it is important to stand up, call out improper behaviour and make sure people are held to account.

“Whilst some may think silence absolves them from responsibility - it does not.”

Fresh intrigue over the FIA’s handling of last December’s events was thrown up earlier this week when the governing body announced that in such circumstances, it was policy to keep matters behind closed doors.

Amid the FIA’s Ethics Committee and Compliance Officer looking into a spate of recent complaints, including a couple surrounding president Mohammed Ben Sulayem that he has been cleared over, it stated that it was policy to not reveal details in public.

In relation to the recent events, it said: “At the FIA, enquiries and complaints are received and managed by the Compliance Officer, and the Ethics Committee where appropriate.

“Both bodies operate autonomously, guaranteeing strict confidentiality throughout the process.

“As a consequence, and in general, we are unable to confirm the receipt of any specific complaint and it is unlikely that we will be able to provide further comment on the complaints that we may receive from any parties.”

This stance will prompt fresh questions about the approach it took with its handling of the Wolff matter.
 
Montoya could have been a Championship contender if he had more luck. He was an absolute beast but I don't think he had the drive nor attitude of a World Champion, hence ended his time in F1 early and by choice. I rate him a better driver than Jenson Button.

I also liked that Montoya treated all the drivers the same and showed Schumacher no extra respect.
Sounds like you’re describing Charles LeClerc.
 
I'm amazed how, in the absence of any evidence, people tend to believe the accuser.

If there really was an absence of evidence they would've had an independent investigation like red bull did.
 
If there really was an absence of evidence they would've had an independent investigation like red bull did.
So you're indeed assuming guilt in the absence of evidence. Are we assuming the same in the Susie saga? Why was there no external investigation there? I guess they're covering her indiscretion up too
 
Looking at the F2 standings, Antonelli is not dominating. Interestingly the guy on top now is Zak Maloney who races with a Barbados licence. It will be good for F1 to have drivers from different regions.
he normally takes 3 races to get up to speed.

Prema is also struggling to get the car into the right window. but they will figure that out and then he will dominate.

not sure he will win the season. but he will be in the running at the very least
 
Funny, the FIA found the FIA president not guilty. This clown should just go.

I'm amazed how, in the absence of any evidence, people tend to believe the accuser.

For me it’s that the FIA is a regulatory body but with absolutely zero transparency. Most sporting bodies release a full report at least not just “CoMPlEteLy ExHoNerATed pEOplE, noTHInG to SEe hERe”
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X