thestaggy
Honorary Master
The FIA has a vested interest in seeing another team take the top spot. Look at the lengths they went to to ensure that was RB. They don’t want to leave it that late again.
?
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
The FIA has a vested interest in seeing another team take the top spot. Look at the lengths they went to to ensure that was RB. They don’t want to leave it that late again.
I have. What you trying to tell me.
Don't agree that he has matured. If anything it would be the opposite.He's not the child anymore that posted memes on his social media account and made funnies with Sainz and Danny Ric. He has matured and emerged as a title contender and that also entails an attitude shift. And that includes being selfish and backing yourself.
Don't agree that he has matured. If anything it would be the opposite.
Let's not pretend that RB is completely innocent, they've done some dodgy schit too. How do you think they ended up with a dominant car in the first place.Let us not forget the lengths they went to to make Mercedes the new hybrid leaders and remove Ferrari, waaaay before the engines came to the F1 paddock, Mercedes were testing them etc etc etc...
If this rear wing is some magic thingie then the other teams will pounce on it asap, they may now be waiting for the FIA to ban them, but I haven't seen anything. I still cannot understand how the RB went from ultra dominant to finishing 6th at best and with a serious struggle.. something doesn't add up, it's not hard to see that some rule has been bent by other teams or some parts have been removed by RB etc etc..
Don't agree that he has matured. If anything it would be the opposite.
Let's not pretend that RB is completely innocent, they've done some dodgy schit too. How do you think they ended up with a dominant car in the first place.
All teams do dodgy schit to get ahead of the other. Finding loopholes in the rules is as much a part of the sport as the actual racing. Do you think Aston and Ferrari just wanted Newey because of his aero skillz?
All we can do is wait and see what the FIA rules on the matter...
Goes without saying.Let us not forget the lengths they went to to make Mercedes the new hybrid leaders and remove Ferrari, waaaay before the engines came to the F1 paddock, Mercedes were testing them etc etc etc...
If this rear wing is some magic thingie then the other teams will pounce on it asap, they may now be waiting for the FIA to ban them, but I haven't seen anything. I still cannot understand how the RB went from ultra dominant to finishing 6th at best and with a serious struggle.. something doesn't add up, it's not hard to see that some rule has been bent by other teams or some parts have been removed by RB etc etc..
The only reason the FIA don't declare half their decisions is to keep the peace with fans.Let's not pretend that RB is completely innocent, they've done some dodgy schit too. How do you think they ended up with a dominant car in the first place.
All teams do dodgy schit to get ahead of the other. Finding loopholes in the rules is as much a part of the sport as the actual racing. Do you think Aston and Ferrari just wanted Newey because of his aero skillz?
All we can do is wait and see what the FIA rules on the matter...
Abu Dhabi 2021, please tell me you're not in denial about that?
You mean when Merc decided not to pit for new rubber and got smoked by the RB on the last lap?Abu Dhabi 2021, please tell me you're not in denial about that?
So they did the same for Hamilton to break all the records?The FIA has a vested interest in seeing another team take the top spot. Look at the lengths they went to to ensure that was RB. They don’t want to leave it that late again.
“However, if a team successfully passes all deflection tests and adheres to the regulations and technical directives, they are deemed to be in full compliance, and no further action will be taken.”
However, the debate is about whether deliberately designing a wing to flex in the manner it does goes against FIA guidance in terms of what is deemed to be acceptable flexing.
In a still current technical directive (TD34) from the FIA that offers guidelines on flexing wings, it is made that clear that certain behaviours will not be tolerated even if wings are passed as legal in the pits.
One team boss told Motorsport.com: “Aero elasticity has been a factor for many, many years now, and even if a wing passes the FIA test the regulations remain very clear - the component cannot be designed to flex.