Mike Hoxbig
Honorary Master
He was going for the Kim Jong Tsu look...Couldn't they get a kiddie-sized suit for Yuki?
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
He was going for the Kim Jong Tsu look...Couldn't they get a kiddie-sized suit for Yuki?
I do not know who signs the checks at Ferrari HQ but to sign a driver past his prime for 60 millions pounds per years is plain stupid, maybe he is revering to that guy.whats the thing?
please somebody tell me
From the comments the issue is top management blaming everyone else except themselves...whats the thing?
please somebody tell me
I do not know who signs the checks at Ferrari HQ but to sign a driver past his prime for 60 millions pounds per years is plain stupid, maybe he is revering to that guy.
damm auto correctOh, the sweet irony...
From the comments the issue is top management blaming everyone else except themselves...
Had a laugh at the British commentators during the race. They explain that Hamilton have floor damage and that is the reason he is losing 0.5s per lap on his teammate.I do not know who signs the checks at Ferrari HQ but to sign a driver past his prime for 60 millions pounds per years is plain stupid, maybe he is revering to that guy.
The mentality is just mind boggling. Apparently you're not allowed to criticise the car because "it's a Ferrari". And everyone is too scared to speak up because of it. Well good luck improving if you can't be honest...Ferrari being Ferrari.
Story goes that when Michael arrived at Ferrari he could see the problems, which is why he pushed so hard to bring in the key Benetton people he had worked with. Critically, he also advocated for Jean Todt who had started coming under pressure from top management. Todt, aside from being a great leader, acted as a buffer between the F1 team and top management, insulating the F1 operation from Ferrari's notoriously bad - and toxic - leadership.
And it worked for a decade before di Montezemolo grew envious of Todt. No surprise then that since di Montezemolo directly interfered in the F1 team they have only gone on to win one WDC.
The reason for the suspension is down to Warwick giving an interview after the Spanish GP, as he commented on Verstappen’s clash with George Russell, where the Red Bull driver was given a 10-second penalty and three penalty points – putting him on the edge of a race ban.
Warwick made specific remarks about the verdict – of which he was not a part of as the FIA stewards panel was made up of David Domingo, Vitantonio Liuzzi, Matthew Selley and Nish Shetty in Barcelona.
“Should he have done what he did with George Russell in Turn 5? Absolutely not. Did he get a penalty for it? Yes,” Warwick said.
“Some people argue that Sebastian Vettel received a 10-second drive-through penalty in Baku when he deliberately drove into Lewis Hamilton. But if you look at the video of Max, it looks to me like he dived in but then turned away from George - the momentum just carried him into him.”
Warwick continued: “I’m not condoning it, I’m not saying it was right. It was absolutely wrong. The FIA rightly gave him a penalty. Should it have been harsher? I actually think they got it about right. Many would say he should have received a race ban as a deterrent for young karting drivers, and they’re probably right.”
The interview creates two key issues which is why the FIA has acted to suspend Warwick.
Firstly, Warwick, as an FIA steward, publicly commented on the judgment of other stewards which is problematic given it is one steward publicly critiquing the ruling of another steward and that is not in the FIA’s interest.
Secondly, the interview wasn’t published by a traditional media outlet, but by a PR agency, which contacts media outlets offering quotes from Warwick - on the condition that the source Plejmo, a gambling website, be credited in exchange for using the quotes.
motorsport
The mentality is just mind boggling. Apparently you're not allowed to criticise the car because "it's a Ferrari". And everyone is too scared to speak up because of it. Well good luck improving if you can't be honest...
"That's not right, Mickey"...for once, I agree with Toto
Fair commentary - I think the movie will probably do well - how well will have to be seen. More eyeballs is always good for the sport.Another great take from Kym and why purists will give this film a bit of ****
Villeneuve is an arsehole, same as that stupid Danica Patrick. Is she there just for the looks?FML and then Villeneuve goes and blames Oscar!
WTF....
Villeneuve is an arsehole, same as that stupid Danica Patrick. Is she there just for the looks?