Fine, Vettal win. Hamilton crashes out with reliability issues.You're supposed to predict with your head lol.
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Fine, Vettal win. Hamilton crashes out with reliability issues.You're supposed to predict with your head lol.
You're supposed to predict with your head lol.
OK, then the best Car and Driver combination will win, neither McLaren will finish.
A McLaren 1-2 in Alberts Park.
That's my prediction.
..!. .!..
![]()
That's only possible if its a MerclarenA McLaren 1-2 in Alberts Park.
That's my prediction.
..!. .!..
![]()

That's only possible if its a Merclaren![]()
and Alonso will get a suntan.
![]()
A McLaren 1-2 in Alberts Park.
That's my prediction.
..!. .!..
![]()
I am also going for this .
It is a Strong possibility.
McLaren 1st and 2nd to retire .................
![]()
It is a Strong possibility.
McLaren 1st and 2nd to retire .................
![]()
McLaren 1st and 2nd to retire .................
Attending a special media briefing at which he clarified the 2017 regulations, Charlie Whiting confirmed that the so-called 'Verstappen rule' has been dropped.
The rule was introduced last season following a number of incidents involving the Red Bull driver, when the Dutch youngster was accused of moving under braking while defending his position.
"There will be a small change to some of the incidents we saw last year handled slightly differently," said Whiting, "simply because the so-called ‘Verstappen' rule has gone.
"Before, we said any move under braking will be investigated," he continued. "Now we have a simple rule that says, effectively, that if a driver moves erratically or goes unnecessarily slowly or behaves in a manner that could endanger another driver then he will be investigated.
"So, it's a very broad rule now, but what we did after Austin last year if you remember was - no, in Austin last year, sorry - in response to some comments from drivers, was that we used the existing rules to put into the events notes as to how we would interpret the existing rules.
"Then, the interpretation simply was that drivers shouldn't move under braking. That's what gave rise to the incident in Mexico, well, not gave rise to the incident, that's what gave rise to the penalty to Seb (Vettel) in Mexico," he continued referring to the penalty handed to the Ferrari driver for his defence while under attack from Daniel Ricciardo.
"Now that will be dealt with slightly differently in that the stewards will be invited to simply focus on every incident and judge it on its own merits. So each incident will be dealt with only on the basis of whether it was a dangerous manoeuvre, not necessarily because he moved under braking.
This guy needs some lessons in how to write clearly......