Fibre in Ramsgate

Who might this vendor be? I clearly don't know enough about fibre logistics. Thought FF is the vendor.

Maybe @AfriNatic can explain

With FTTH there are usually different types of layers to the rollout.

Layer 1 is usually backhaul. This can be an FNO or it can be outsourced and bought from a provider. Some that comes to mind is Openserve, Link Africa, Dark Fibre Africa, MTN, Liquid Telecoms, Seacom etc.

Layer 2 is usually the rollout of the FTTH and the OLT or switch.

Layer 3 is the ISP part which can be Afrihost or even the FNO itself like in the case of Metrofibre where they can be L2 and L3.

In this case the Vendor is likely the backhaul provider between the OLT's for Frogfoot.
 
Outage Update| DBN | Durban | Partial|Vendor has dispatched an additional team to assist with work on site, further updates to follow

Outage Update| DBN | Durban | Partial|Vendor techs will need to install a new cable and splice two joints
 
Outage Update | DBN | Durban | Partial | Vendor technicians are still floating the new cable | Vendor technicians are busy splicing.
 
Nice ping. Mine's still 11.

Btw I just tested too and Speedtest app is the only one over 900/900. MyBB says 40 and Speedtest online 140.

Chrome overheads 95% of my line speed? ...

Tell me again how the app version is not prioritized.

EDIT: Second test -
 

Attachments

  • 1.JPG
    1.JPG
    29.6 KB · Views: 16
  • 2.JPG
    2.JPG
    21 KB · Views: 16
  • 3.JPG
    3.JPG
    32.6 KB · Views: 16
Last edited:
  • Wow
Reactions: Yuu
Nice ping. Mine's still 11.

Btw I just tested too and Speedtest app is the only one over 900/900. MyBB says 40 and Speedtest online 140.

Chrome overheads 95% of my line speed? ...

Tell me again how the app version is not prioritized.

EDIT: Second test -
Oh yeah the browser protocol has always been extremely erroneous for different reasons. I once ran the browser Speedtest on an Android TV box compared to a sideloaded app version and it gave me 25 vs 94mbps respectively with disgusting ping of course.

On more powerful devices I mainly use it to quickly check if something is wrong but for performance checking I always use native / cli tools.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Yuu
Oh yeah the browser protocol has always been extremely erroneous for different reasons. I once ran the browser Speedtest on an Android TV box compared to a sideloaded app version and it gave me 25 vs 94mbps respectively with disgusting ping of course.

On more powerful devices I mainly use it to quickly check if something is wrong but for performance checking I always use native / cli tools.
And yet others like Yuu above get full line speed on websites. Just browse the number of threads here. How to explain that then?
 
And yet others like Yuu above get full line speed on websites. Just browse the number of threads here. How to explain that then?
Yep I wish I could, it just seems to depend on a few factors I don't know of yet. I also closely saturate my line on most browsers but I've noticed that throughput with jitter testing was affected regardless.
 
Well at least its looking a bit better this morning.
 

Attachments

  • 2.jpg
    2.jpg
    30.1 KB · Views: 10
  • 1.jpg
    1.jpg
    16.5 KB · Views: 10
  • Like
Reactions: Yuu
Nice ping. Mine's still 11.

Btw I just tested too and Speedtest app is the only one over 900/900. MyBB says 40 and Speedtest online 140.

Chrome overheads 95% of my line speed? ...

Tell me again how the app version is not prioritized.

EDIT: Second test -

Hi,

We don't prioritise traffic at all. The Speedtest.net app is just better at handling the high speeds compared to a browser where the browser can actually cause the bottleneck and throttle the speeds.

It should be the same where a browser speedtest will be slow but downloading torrents via a torrent client is fast. The actual software just runs better.
 
Could you do a speedtest with incognito mode, just curious to see something.

Yeah don't worry, I know what you re about to tell me...

/ I forgot to test in Incognito last night.
 

Attachments

  • 1.jpg
    1.jpg
    144.2 KB · Views: 14
  • Love
Reactions: Yuu
So i am going through the paper this afternoon, yes thats right i was bored and needed something to do :ROFL:

i see there is a big ad in the paper that metrofibre is coming to the coast, good to see the coast is geting different options.

Currently it seems the areas covered for now will be Anerley, Bazley Beach, Elysium, Hibberdene, Ifafa Beach, Melville, Mtwalume, Palmcliffe, Pumula, Southport, Sunwich Port, Umzumbe and Wood Grange.
 
  • Love
Reactions: Yuu
Nice. Get ready for even more downtime due to new cable breaks as result of all this digging though.

And Hibberdene but not Tweni or Marburg and Sheppie which is the business hub seems stupid.

They are starting in Hibberdene digging north so no use to us.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Yuu
Nice. Get ready for even more downtime due to new cable breaks as result of all this digging though.

And Hibberdene but not Tweni or Marburg and Sheppie which is the business hub seems stupid.

They are starting in Hibberdene digging north so no use to us.
Hopefully they come around our end at some stage, the more the merrier. Can always reach out to them and tell them how bad the down time of ff is and maybe they will consider at some stage.

That being said openserve is live for me, they seem to be on track.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X