South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Agreed was a reckless tackle. Especially dumb in the box.He doesn't get to the ball just clearly takes out the players legs. That's always a penalty.
Since when is Inter not the spotlight. Was also good at napoli his first season.
Simple facts are at club level only Antoine Conte has been able to get the best out of him.
It was a €75 mil transfer at the time, still remains a club record. Lets also not try and dimmish expectations of wearing the Inter nr 9 shirt and being expected to be the man to overcome the juve dominance at the time.Yes, Inter are big, but it aint a £75 million move to United (9 years ago) or a £98 move to Chelsea and the expectations that came with it. And while Napoli have been competitive in recent years, they are not even the biggest club in Italy.
In terms of cumulative transfer fees over a career, he is the second most expensive player in history (only Neymar has cost his clubs more). On the body of his club performances, he has not lived up to that.
LolHe doesn't get to the ball just clearly takes out the players legs. That's always a penalty.
Nothing reckless about it.Agreed was a reckless tackle. Especially dumb in the box.



I said this about the Bafana Bafana Red card, I don't know how you can foul someone coming from behind you while trying to play the ball.Lol
Nothing reckless about it.
Watch this clip from five seconds before the collision.. or better yet, watch the full replay if you don't believe me. The defender doesn't even know where the attacker is because he's focused on the ball the entire time.
Context matters. VAR and the referee seemed to judge only the moment of impact, without considering how the play developed.
View attachment 1918949
split second later, still just focusing on the ball
View attachment 1918950
Just before the impact.
View attachment 1918952
The attacker came from behind and from the side. The defender never went into him. it was the other way around. This is never a reckless foul. Looking at the collision in isolation led to the wrong decision. Full stop.
He leaves his feet. No reason to that from where he was placed. Whenever you leave your feet as a defender you are taking a chance of something going wrong.Lol
Nothing reckless about it.
Watch this clip from five seconds before the collision.. or better yet, watch the full replay if you don't believe me. The defender doesn't even know where the attacker is because he's focused on the ball the entire time.
Context matters. VAR and the referee seemed to judge only the moment of impact, without considering how the play developed.
View attachment 1918949
split second later, still just focusing on the ball
View attachment 1918950
Just before the impact.
View attachment 1918952
The attacker came from behind and from the side. The defender never went into him. it was the other way around. This is never a reckless foul. Looking at the collision in isolation led to the wrong decision. Full stop.
here is a better view, from atop.
Not that bad. It's like playing at Ellis Park.The next game England are playing in Mexico and apparently that stadium is in a high altitude how do you think that's going to affect the England players?
the iconic stadium is located roughly 7,220 feet (about 2,200 meters) above sea level
If he has no clue there's an attacker near him, he really needs to stop playing football.Lol
Nothing reckless about it.
Watch this clip from five seconds before the collision.. or better yet, watch the full replay if you don't believe me. The defender doesn't even know where the attacker is because he's focused on the ball the entire time.
Context matters. VAR and the referee seemed to judge only the moment of impact, without considering how the play developed.
View attachment 1918949
split second later, still just focusing on the ball
View attachment 1918950
Just before the impact.
View attachment 1918952
The attacker came from behind and from the side. The defender never went into him. it was the other way around. This is never a reckless foul. Looking at the collision in isolation led to the wrong decision. Full stop.
here is a better view, from atop.
Agreed. If he wasn't aware of anyone behind as is the claim, he would've just hoofed it out, not lunged in.He leaves his feet. No reason to that from where he was placed. Whenever you leave your feet as a defender you are taking a chance of something going wrong.
So agree to disagree.
Mexico's record at axteca is never having lost there in a world cup and only lost twice in 50 world cup qualifiers. It will be difficult for england.Not that bad. It's like playing at Ellis Park.
Oh wow that's not a good record to have for England.Mexico's record at axteca is never having lost there in a world cup and only lost twice in 50 world cup qualifiers. It will be difficult for england.
If he has no clue there's an attacker near him, he really needs to stop playing football.
Of course he knows there are attackers around him. The point is that at that specific moment, he’s focused on the ball and looking in the opposite direction. He doesn’t see the attacker approaching from slightly behind and to the side wanting to breath down his neck.Agreed. If he wasn't aware of anyone behind as is the claim, he would've just hoofed it out, not lunged in.
Consistently **** refereeing in this tournamentHow was that not a goal?
Ridiculous!! It's shaping up to be a great tournament but spoiled by some piss poor officiating!!Consistently **** refereeing in this tournament