South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
The iPhone isn't the "perfect" tweaker phone, of course. There are still a lot of things I miss about Android. For example, you can get widgets on the iPhone, but it isn't quite the same, and you won't have the vast library that you do on Android. I'll always miss the ability to install custom keyboards like Swype and SwiftKey, or being able to create location-based automation like you can in Tasker. Furthermore, Android users can download new kernels, radios, and other deep-system tweaks that iPhone users aren't really privy to—though I'd also argue that I no longer feel the need to, because the iPhone isn't as laggy or battery-starved as my Android phone was (speed and battery life being the primary benefit of these deep-system tweaks). You also don't have full ROMs on the iPhone, but frankly, wouldn't you rather piece together all your favorite tweaks from Cydia than have another developer do it for you? Android ROMs can be great, but again, I feel like half the time I'm downloading them to fix a problem rather than add cool stuff.
I'm still waiting to get my hands on an android device but whats your take on that last bit you highlighted?I get that he loves his iPhone more than Android but I must admit I did laugh at the last section:
Btw, as well as being unfamiliar with Android I'm not much of a jailbreaker eitherAndroid ROMs can be great, but again, I feel like half the time I'm downloading them to fix a problem rather than add cool stuff.
I'm still waiting to get my hands on an android device but whats your take on that last bit you highlighted?
[)roi(];8369035 said:A mute discussion...
Why even bother with underpowered and hampered devices when for years we've had unhindered full-blown computing solutions like OSX, Linux, Windows, ...
Show me a person who thinks Android or iOS phone / tablet can today be a viable 100% substitute for power user needs and I'll argue they're either morons, or have masochistic tendencies.
We haven't hit the point where a single device will suffice... So for now I prefer my smartphone to be just simple i.e. don't need it to be a second class replacement for my desktop / laptop / xbox, ...
If you disagree, then get rid of your PCs, etc. and try to function (all requirements) for a week with only your phone / tablet...
Who said anything about smartphones replacing desktops? Having certain advanced capabilities added to smartphones doesn't imply that it needs to replace a desktop. It just opens up more options for the odd occasion that one might want to make use of it.
Anyway, even though technology might advance to the point of a phone having advanced capabilities implemented sufficiently to your liking, I'm pretty sceptical about the idea of one device replacing all other devices. The future will probably involve an array of devices that utilise the cloud to bring deep integration by syncing. In fact, the Android and iOS platforms already does this to a great extent.
Bwana - This is all very off-topic, of course, so do excuse me, please.
[)roi(];8369135 said:Not off topic imo; many of the reasons for tweaking and the examples given re Samba, PS3 game controllers, watching videos, ... have historically been associated with PCs, game consoles, TVs,...
Hence my point that the entire tweaking / custom ROM crap is a futile / wasted effort without any real or viable benefits (at best it's a second rate effort vs the historical alternative)
For me people that tend to play with this stuff have far too much idle time i.e. fancy moving wallpapers, changing fonts, themes, widgets, ... as proven in OSX & Windows adds no real value,
While it's true that often people do tend to go "OMG! Custom roms!" and then fall off to the side, that's true of almost any technology isn't it? There are always those people who actually stick to fiddling and remaking and generally make things better than when they arrived. Look at MIUI, CyanogenMod and a couple of the other big release folks and you'll see that they produce roms that almost completely change the way the devices are.and typically after the fleeting interest, tends only to fall by the way side.
I'm btw quite happy for a phone to be a phone, computer to be a computer, ...
[)roi(];8369035 said:Why even bother with underpowered and hampered devices when for years we've had unhindered full-blown computing solutions like OSX, Linux, Windows, ...
Show me a person who thinks Android or iOS phone / tablet can today be a viable 100% substitute for power user needs and I'll argue they're either morons, or have masochistic tendencies.
We haven't hit the point where a single device will suffice... So for now I prefer my smartphone to be just simple i.e. don't need it to be a second class replacement for my desktop / laptop / xbox, ...
If you disagree, then get rid of your PCs, etc. and try to function (all requirements) for a week with only your phone / tablet...
[)roi(];8369135 said:Not off topic imo; many of the reasons for tweaking and the examples given re Samba, PS3 game controllers, watching videos, ... have historically been associated with PCs, game consoles, TVs,...
Hence my point that the entire tweaking / custom ROM crap is a futile / wasted effort without any real or viable benefits (at best it's a second rate effort vs the historical alternative)
For me people that tend to play with this stuff have far too much idle time i.e. fancy moving wallpapers, changing fonts, themes, widgets, ... as proven in OSX & Windows adds no real value, and typically after the fleeting interest, tends only to fall by the way side.
I'm btw quite happy for a phone to be a phone, computer to be a computer, ...
I agree but with a few caveats. Jailbreaking the iPad2/4S was only possible after like half a year of being on the market which for me meant I bought an iPad2 and then sat without access to 4/5ths of the apps due to the whole US/SA iTunes store debacle. But once the tools were available, it was a breeze to do and yep - I can now do more with it than I can with either of my Android devices.
On the Kindle Fire it was a huge schlep to root, and even then it took a long time for the community to get ICS working properly with hardware rendering. SGS wasn't as difficult because it's very old and the tools are well established but still for a supposedly 'open' system like Android why is rooting such a pain to do? Touchwiz 2.3 is not something I want to sit with by default and you are quite limited what you can do without rooting. Then you must hunt and peck for a decent stable tool - risk getting a bootloop or worse which will take a big effort to fix....
Then my friend's HTC Sensation has only now been able to root and even then major things were broken.
In fact MIUI is so good that I prefer my DHD above my Xperia S simply because the Xperia's MIUI ROM is still in alpha stage, I will switch back to Xperia S once MIUI for it has been released.
Elimentals- off topic, but how do you find the Xperia S?
You dont need to root to change the look, simple launchers can do that for you.
Check Go Launcher, SPB Shell 3D, Launcher7, ADW EX, and millions more
As for why its so hard, well blame the SP's they the ones that request the lockdowns because they wanna protect there precious bloatware.
Edit: Oh and I think you missing the point of Open, Android is Open as in you can go download the source code from http://source.android.com/ and do with it as you please. Its not Open as every phone is open for you to do as you please, if you want that go buy a Nexus, that is why they exist.
Oh and I think you missing the point of Open
And the fact remains that rooting is far more fraught on Android than it ought to be because of carrier discretions.
in the end it's hardly any more open TO THE USER than iOS.
I appreciate all of those points. But it's not just about changing the look. I want the features of the latest version of Android which is actually very nice - to me nicer in many aspects than iOS 5. The only way to get those was to root. Not to mention that any of the decent Android modding tools simply require rooting. Titanium backup for instance. And the fact remains that rooting is far more fraught on Android than it ought to be because of carrier discretions.
No I get the point of open - it's just that in Android the term open must be so carefully ring-fenced with 'open does not mean this this and this even though you might wish it did' that in the end it's hardly any more open TO THE USER than iOS.
Yeah, this is a problem that crops up all the time and it does suck - it's getting better though. Quite a few manufacturers are now starting to get onboard with the bigger release people like Cyanogen and making things easier for them. It's not ideal yet but it's kinda getting there. Custom Rom builders are also getting quite nice, I played with a very nice GUI based flasher the other day.
Personally, I feel the opposite is true. Android is so far open that it starts to seem closed. Because you can literally do anything you want (up to and including bricking your phone), it's almost as if there's too much freedom. People like to have a little bit of control, some end that they can't go past. I mean, I've bricked my phone many times (I even had to make my own USB jig to unbrick it which was... not the most pleasant experience of my life) but I knew what I was doing - the average user doesn't.
Why can't we just blame the ones who made the software? That's a very silly argument. We didn't create the situation.I get that but to be honest we only have ourselves to blame.
I don't have a Nexus. In my whole life I've met 1 person who does have a Nexus. It's a brilliant phone but it's very atypical and niche.See above about Nexus,