vodacom3g
Vodacom Representative
Without defending the shops (I normally don't), I don't think it was a question of ethics, rather one of incompetence....Exactly. That's unethical. There are many people out there who will believe whatever salespeople tell them.It does actually hold water as you had to use the vlive apn which is very restricted and runs through a proxy which reduces traffic outside the network. The internet apn was used mainly to connect on a computer and didn't have any of these restrictions.
As you know, the systems that were put in place was for PPDB's and this vlive-issue was a side-effect, and not the main concern. To be quite honest we had no idea of the extent of the helping to the 'free' service. We thought (could have checked, I guess) that it was a few people browsing on their handsets. So it was quite a surprise. Amazing how enterprising people can get!What I am b1tching about is the fact that Vodacom stopped it without warning. Thereby resulting in people being charged without even knowing it. Vodacom knew about the free browsing and allowed people to use it and therefor it was unethical to not give a warning.
Not quite true, nothing would be better for Vodacom than to get PPDB's out, we know we're loosing users because of this. But it's still in testing.Btw. Vodacom still haven't implemented ppdbs despite the system being in place. All they used it for is charging for vlive access. It seems Vodacom would only do something to further their own interests, but we knew that already.![]()