Gadaffi Sodomized

This is Current Affairs. Keep to the thread please.

Hi Apache, i really think its only fair that you answer this question since you brought it up. I enjoy anal sex with women, provided they consent to me being up their bum of course, do you think this should be illegal? Not gonna flame you for giving your perceptive, would genuinely like to know.
 
Hi Apache, i really think its only fair that you answer this question since you brought it up. I enjoy anal sex with women, provided they consent to me being up their bum of course, do you think this should be illegal? Not gonna flame you for giving your perceptive, would genuinely like to know.
I agree. It is also related to the thread topic anyway.
 
As for Gaddafi... not a good way to go at all but i cant say i blame them, its also very difficult for me to have any sympathy for the brother leader considering his own deeds which included ordering rape and murder, not to mention the women who have come forward claiming he personally raped them. He got his in the end.
 
I have question for you guys how is Gadaffi's brutal death any different from the Amy Beil incident?

When 26-year-old Biehl drove a friend home to the township of Guguletu, outside Cape Town, on August 25, 1993, a black mob pelted her car with stones and smashed its windows while shouting racial epithets. Biehl was struck in the head with a brick, then dragged from her car and surrounded by a mob who stoned and stabbed her to death while she begged for her life.[1] Four of Biehl's murderers were convicted for her killing; however, in 1998, all were pardoned by South Africa's Truth and Reconciliation Commission

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amy_Biehl
 
I'll take it up the PM as well, please.

Or just answer it quick, no one will mind. I'm not sure why you are reluctant. Was I correct in calling you a bigot?

Hmm, Freudian slip or something.
 
Never heard it called that before :) ;) ... poopus maximus? :D

... considering the thread topic, freudian slip perhaps ?


I knew he had an very open mind but never realised it went that far :wtf:
 
I'll take it up the PM as well, please.

Or just answer it quick, no one will mind. I'm not sure why you are reluctant. Was I correct in calling you a bigot?

One who is strongly partial to one's own group, religion, race, or politics and is intolerant of those who differ. from http://www.thefreedictionary.com/bigot

Is this what you mean by bigot? Cause if you are then its a case of finger pointing but three pointing back.
 
The Amy murder was based on racial hatred, but Gaddafi's death was not.

Gaddafi oppressed his people in the same way the Apartheid Gov oppressed the blacks.The source of the hatred is the same.
 
Last edited:
In that it was a brutal death, and savage mob mentality, similar obviously. What's your point though?

My point is that given the right conditions 'normal' human beings can indulge in extreme savagery irrespective of race, colour, creed or religion.

So to is Barack Obama's new strategy of ordered executions.
 
One who is strongly partial to one's own group, religion, race, or politics and is intolerant of those who differ. from http://www.thefreedictionary.com/bigot

Is this what you mean by bigot? Cause if you are then its a case of finger pointing but three pointing back.
Please just answer the question. You're turning this into a nightmare that is entirely unnecessary.
 
One who is strongly partial to one's own group, religion, race, or politics and is intolerant of those who differ. from http://www.thefreedictionary.com/bigot

Is this what you mean by bigot? Cause if you are then its a case of finger pointing but three pointing back.

I am going to ask you again:

Just so we are all on the same page Apache, you are okay with sodomy between consenting adults being legal, right?

I'm not intolerant at all of anyone, provided they cause no harm. Hence my question. If you answer 'yes', you are not a bigot, if you answer 'no' then you are.

So just answer, so we can lay this to rest now.
 
My point is that given the right conditions 'normal' human beings can indulge in extreme savagery irrespective of race, colour, creed or religion.

So to is Barack Obama's new strategy of ordered executions.

Of course. I'm fairly sure I've said precisely the same thing in this thread, earlier on.
 
My point is that given the right conditions 'normal' human beings can indulge in extreme savagery irrespective of race, colour, creed or religion.

So to is Barack Obama's new strategy of ordered executions.

Is this actually happening?
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X