Gadaffi Sodomized

DrYes said:
My point is that given the right conditions 'normal' human beings can indulge in extreme savagery irrespective of race, colour, creed or religion.

So to is Barack Obama's new strategy of ordered executions.
Click to expand...

Agree

Apologies then for accusing you of trolling, though you were taking the thread in a whole other direction.
 
DrYes said:
My point is that given the right conditions 'normal' human beings can indulge in extreme savagery irrespective of race, colour, creed or religion.
Click to expand...
This should be obvious. Which is why I'm asking for Apache's opinion as an individual (as opposed to asking for his opinion as a Christian or a Wiccan or a Bonobo or whatever he is) to see how important he thinks human rights are.


So to is Barack Obama's new strategy of ordered executions.
Click to expand...
I don't really follow American politics. Did he bring back the death penalty or something?
 
porchrat said:
This should be obvious. Which is why I'm asking for Apache's opinion as an individual (as opposed to asking for his opinion as a Christian or a Wiccan or a Bonobo or whatever he is) to see how important he thinks human rights are.



I don't really follow American politics. Did he bring back the death penalty or something?
Click to expand...

Drone assassinations against alleged "terrorists", including american citizens.
 
Fader4 said:
Drone assassinations against alleged "terrorists", including american citizens.
Click to expand...
Oh... conspiracy theory stuff.

Meh let me know when there is something concrete and he faces a trial. Until then I'm filing that along with illuminati and the majestic 12.
 
Fader4 said:
:erm:

You really should keep up to date with current affairs if you are going to comment on this stuff...

http://www.smh.com.au/world/awlakis-son-16-killed-by-drone-20111020-1mace.html

http://www.washingtonpost.com/world...al-questions/2011/10/20/gIQAdvUY7L_story.html
Click to expand...
Interesting I wasn't aware of this. An ethics minefield that one is.

Thank you for the interesting links. I will keep this rather nasty little tidbit in the back of my mind the next time I am told something about the current US president.

and you are right yes I apologise I really should keep more up to date on current affairs.
 
copacetic said:
Apache? Please answer the question I have posed to you several times now.
Click to expand...

Doubt he will, my opinion is this. If Apache believes it is wrong for two men to have some bum fun, and that this should be outlawed then he is a bigot.

If he thinks bum fun is wrong in any scenario, perhaps religious objections, then he is not.

As i said before Apache, don your flamesuit and express your views :D

Dont worry about any flames from me though, have already undertaken not to flame you.
 
Last edited:
Fader4 said:
Doubt he will, my opinion is this. If Apache believes it is wrong for two men to have some bum fun hes a bigot.

If he thinks bum fun is wrong in any scenario, perhaps religious objections, then he is not.
Click to expand...
This isn't about whether or not he thinks it is wrong. It is about whether he not he thinks it should be illegal. It is about whether or not he thinks he has the right to force his sense of morality onto others through the legal system.
 
Fader4 said:
Doubt he will, my opinion is this. If Apache believes it is wrong for two men to have some bum fun, and that this should be outlawed then he is a bigot.

If he thinks bum fun is wrong in any scenario, perhaps religious objections, then he is not.

As i said before Apache, don your flamesuit and express your views :D

Dont worry about any flames from me though, have already undertaken not to flame you.
Click to expand...

I want him to answer specifically because he reprimanded me for calling him a bigot. If he is using his personal views to hold the opinion that anyone's consensual behaviour in the bedroom should be illegal, then he is a bigot, then his reprimand was very dishonest.

The more resistant he is to answer, the more I am forced to assume I was correct.
 
porchrat said:
This isn't about whether or not he thinks it is wrong. It is about whether he not he thinks it should be illegal. It is about whether or not he thinks he has the right to force his sense of morality onto others through the legal system.
Click to expand...

Post edited before you posted already ;)
 
porchrat said:
Interesting I wasn't aware of this. An ethics minefield that one is.

Thank you for the interesting links. I will keep this rather nasty little tidbit in the back of my mind the next time I am told something about the current US president.

and you are right yes I apologise I really should keep more up to date on current affairs.
Click to expand...

Where have you been. They've been [-]assassinating[/-] killing thousands of Al Qaeda members for the last decade :erm:
 
Alan said:
Where have you been. They've been [-]assassinating[/-] killing thousands of Al Qaeda members for the last decade :erm:
Click to expand...
Like I said I don't really follow American politics. You know... unlike you... who seems obsessed with it.

As to where I was a decade ago I was in high school and at that point all I cared about was getting laid.
 
Fader4 said:
Yes, Obama pretty much kills anyone who he wants anywhere in the world.

Guilty until proven innocent and all that jazz.
Click to expand...

Really Fader4 you do know how to stretch the truth to your own advantage.

You also make it sound as if Obama personally oversees every death in which the US Amy/Navy/Air-force has anything to do with. You then link porchrat to an article discussing the death of a kid who was involved with Al Qaeda up to his eyeballs, in order to prove your point.

I give up. :rolleyes:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X