Soul Assassin
Honorary Master
- Joined
- Mar 27, 2006
- Messages
- 11,758
- Reaction score
- 2,330
I bought one for R699. Includes 2x glasses and all 4 Shrek movies in 3D.
Where from, I want it bad.
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
I bought one for R699. Includes 2x glasses and all 4 Shrek movies in 3D.
I see plasma's are readily available in FHD most of the ones I see in stores are all 720 not 1080.
So I guess when I get a 42' it'll be a LCD, Plus the lighting in my lounge wouldn't be suitable for a plasma.
In that case, you will have to go for 40" LCD. Probably best to go for the Samsung LA40D550, should be around R5,999 (R1,000 more than 42" plasma).
Unless you can afford a 100Hz LCD.
In that case, you will have to go for 40" LCD. Probably best to go for the Samsung LA40D550, should be around R5,999 (R1,000 more than 42" plasma).
Unless you can afford a 100Hz LCD.
100hz hmm if i can get a 120Hz maybe I can go 3D with out paying for the cost the "3D TV" marketing cost.
I really want a TV with Wireless then I need to get a tablet and a media server with wireless and shove all that in some cupboard. So all the TV has plugged in is the power cable and you used the Tablet to control the TV with.
But I like your idea better,then don't have to spend lots of money I don't have.![]()
D550 was on special for R1000 about a week ago. I'm sure it'll pop up again for that price
100hz hmm if i can get a 120Hz maybe I can go 3D with out paying for the cost the "3D TV" marketing cost.
I really want a TV with Wireless then I need to get a tablet and a media server with wireless and shove all that in some cupboard. So all the TV has plugged in is the power cable and you used the Tablet to control the TV with.
But I like your idea better,then don't have to spend lots of money I don't have.![]()
R4,999 was a very good price.
But this has nothing to do with the panel. These are signal processing errors happening in the DSP before being displayed by the panel.So I spent some time with the new Sony 46" CX520 - supposedly the same panels as the Samsung 46" D550 (Sony and Samsung have a joint LCD panel manufacturing venture).
Motion artefacts in sport are clearly evident via HD PVR/1080i, you can literally see each horizontal line tearing. Especially visible on faces while panning.
I'm guessing scaling the picture down to 1024x768 doesnt provide enough fine detail to percieve similar levels of motion corruption. Its not like the 4 series plasmas have any better DSPs than the 5 series, and they're not immune to signal processing issues.What I can say is that I have none of this on my 42" plasma via HD PVR/1080i.
But this has nothing to do with the panel. These are signal processing errors happening in the DSP before being displayed by the panel.
Cant comment on the Sony CX, but I dont see anything as dramatic as you describe on my C530 at home or C5000 LED at the office. Maybe Samsung 5 series DSPs/algorithms are better? Not saying there wont be any motion corruption on a 5 series (50Hz) displaying a 1080i feed, but the times this is apparent to me is infrequent/negligable compare to constant benefit of a very sharp high-fidelity 1920x1080 picture.
There are other influencing factors too, was the CX running in 1:1 pixel or 16:9 output mode? De-interlacing + scaling is more taxing on the DSP and prone to more processing errors. Also the quality of the 1080i feed has a lot to do with it, you need to check out various event feeds (both local/intl shot).
I'm guessing scaling the picture down to 1024x768 doesnt provide enough fine detail to percieve similar levels of motion corruption. Its not like the 4 series plasmas have any better DSPs than the 5 series, and the're are not immune to signal processing issues.
But this has nothing to do with the panel. These are signal processing errors happening in the DSP before being displayed by the panel.
Cant comment on the Sony CX, but I dont see anything as dramatic as you describe on my C530 at home or C5000 LED at the office. Maybe Samsung 5 series DSPs/algorithms are better? Not saying there wont be any motion corruption on a 5 series (50Hz) displaying a 1080i feed, but the times this is apparent to me is infrequent/negligable compare to constant benefit of a very sharp high-fidelity 1920x1080 picture.
There are other influencing factors too, was the CX running in 1:1 pixel or 16:9 output mode? De-interlacing + scaling is more taxing on the DSP and prone to more processing errors. Also the quality of the 1080i feed has a lot to do with it, you need to check out various event feeds (both local/intl shot).
I'm guessing scaling the picture down to 1024x768 doesnt provide enough fine detail to percieve similar levels of motion corruption. Its not like the 4 series plasmas have any better DSPs than the 5 series, and they're not immune to signal processing issues.
Ever wondered whats inside a modern flatscreen TV. Check out ... http://revision3.com/tekzilla/cheap-3d-camcorder ... jump to the 3rd segment where they strip down a Samsung UN55D8000 LED.
EDIT: [-]No need, mouse over video so the progress bar displays, on it you'll see dots, click 3rd dot to FF to 3rd segment.[/-] ... updated link above with just the segment mentioned.Please give the time we must jump to.