joefriday
Active Member
We are getting married at home affairs this Friday. Anyone know what the dress code is? We wanted to keep it very casual with Jeans and T-shirts?
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Necessary, of course. But not sufficient.Congratulations!
You are already in agreement with what you want to wear. Open communication and common interests goes a long way in creating a successful marriage.
Necessary, of course. But not sufficient.
For me, the sine qua non is a permanent and irrevocable commitment to stay the course until death no matter what. That way marital failure through alienation, infidelity, sickness or other incapacity is not an option, which means you both invest everything it takes to make it work. When you do, nothing in this life makes for deeper happiness and joy. When you don't, the chances greatly diminish that your relationship will last, because you will most certainly encounter tough times. Only an irrevocable commitment will see you through to the other side, where lasting happiness lies.
Why do you say that? What dont you agree with?Whatever.
No, not really. An irrevocable commitment does not create lasting happiness. People can be deeply committed but unhappy.Why do you say that? What dont you agree with?
Of course an irrevocable commitment does not per se and in itself produce happiness. But without it you do not make the total investment of self in the other that is necessary for happiness. It's all about venturing and risking everything. Staking your whole self and your future happiness on this relationship, with no possibility of another while you or your beloved are alive. High risk, high return. Low risk, low return.No, not really. An irrevocable commitment does not create lasting happiness. People can be deeply committed but unhappy.
You're repeating yourself there.Of course an irrevocable commitment does not per se and in itself produce happiness.
You jest about what is really a very serious matter: commitment made in love.I'd go in my birthday suit TBH.
Not really. Per se denotes necessary or logical inherence between two or more referents or qualia. In itself denotes an intrinsic quality without any reference to an extrinsic qualia. Subtle diffs, but I agree that in context I could have gotten away with just one.You're repeating yourself there.
Necessary, of course. But not sufficient.
For me, the sine qua non is a permanent and irrevocable commitment to stay the course until death no matter what. That way marital failure through alienation, infidelity, sickness or other incapacity is not an option, which means you both invest everything it takes to make it work. When you do, nothing in this life makes for deeper happiness and joy. When you don't, the chances greatly diminish that your relationship will last, because you will most certainly encounter tough times. Only an irrevocable commitment will see you through to the other side, where lasting happiness lies.
Arthur seriously ? dude you are seriously mentally masturbating right now.You jest about what is really a very serious matter: commitment made in love.
I suspect you're one of millions self-sabotaging, destroying your own prospect of committed self-donation because you're trapped in a cycle of porn and masturbation, which daily reinforces your own self-centredness and daily weakens your ability to give yourself in fidelity.
Very sad.