Hardware Bargains

Status
Not open for further replies.

SFW007

Expert Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2005
Messages
1,620
All the prices are ex vat their way of subliminally inprinting that it's a bargain on items
 

Ho3n3r

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 5, 2012
Messages
17,058
All the prices are ex vat their way of subliminally inprinting that it's a bargain on items

But it's easy to work it out on a calculator before we get happy, so there's really no fooling us.
 

Ho3n3r

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 5, 2012
Messages
17,058
Maybe not so great a deal for that 1TB...

TakeAlot - 1TB 2.5" External USB2
http://www.takealot.com/computers/transcend-storejet-25d2-external-hard-drive-1tb,30048509
R731 ex VAT

TakeAlot - 1TB 3.5" External USB3
http://www.takealot.com/computers/v...-3-5-usb-3-0-cambridge-model-1tb-bla,30119650
R635 ex VAT

TakeAlot - Toshiba 1TB 2.5" External USB3
http://www.takealot.com/computers/t...2-5-1tb-usb-3-0-portable-drive-black,29496000
R762 ex VAT

TakeAlot - WD 1TB 2.5" External USB3
http://www.takealot.com/computers/w...-5-inch-external-hard-drive-titanium,29921976
R780 ex VAT

Where are you getting these prices which are excluding VAT? Takealot only shows prices including VAT.
 

D4N

Expert Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2007
Messages
1,884
Where are you getting these prices which are excluding VAT? Takealot only shows prices including VAT.

I was gonna ask the same thing, but I think he's trying to illustrate that the Esquire deals aren't really that special
 

i.got~issues

Expert Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2011
Messages
4,718
He did it to make it comparable with Esquire, if I understand correctly.

^^ This ... yup, I just displayed them ala Esquire style for an ex VAT comparison. As soon as you ad VAT, Esquire's prices seem less special.
 

SYNERGY

Executive Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2007
Messages
6,010
Yep, and Western Digital is one of the more reliable brands as shown in a study recently. Less failures then Seagate.
 

MagicDude4Eva

Banned
Joined
Apr 2, 2008
Messages
6,479
Yep, and Western Digital is one of the more reliable brands as shown in a study recently. Less failures then Seagate.

Perhaps I am unfortunate that I had massive amount of failures in SANs and NASs with WD server drives. Have not had any issue ever switching to Seagate. My home-NAS dropped 5 WD server drives within 2 months (only 18 months old) whereas the replaced Seagates have now been running for solid 3 years.
 

TheGrove

Expert Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2013
Messages
1,314
Perhaps I am unfortunate that I had massive amount of failures in SANs and NASs with WD server drives. Have not had any issue ever switching to Seagate. My home-NAS dropped 5 WD server drives within 2 months (only 18 months old) whereas the replaced Seagates have now been running for solid 3 years.

We have had the exact opposite issues on our DVR systems using NAS devices to store video footage, been replacing Seagate drives with WD, the failure rate on the Seagate drives has be very high.
 
Last edited:

MagicDude4Eva

Banned
Joined
Apr 2, 2008
Messages
6,479

Remember that there is a difference in reliability of "green" drives vs regular drives. If you read the report about BackBlaze you will find that they are quite happy with the Seagate ST#000DM001 drives. The desktop drives I used in NAS environments were Seagate ST2000DM001 (2TB) and ST3000DM001 (3TB) which are rock-solid. Also remember in a business model like BackBlaze (providing cloud storage) there will always be a trade-off between failure rate and price. I would think that they have opted to go with some Seagate models as those where cheaper and it was acceptable to have a higher error rate. Also remember those are desktop drives being exposed to usage patterns your regular PC or home-NAS would never experience.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top