QUOTE
“Even the fanciest flat-panel screen is analogue, not digital,” Buchanan said.
“There are digital sets available in the US and Europe, but there are none in South Africa and it will probably be two or three years before they become available here.”
UNQUOTE
?????!
Yeah that's an oversimplification. There are two types of widescreen displays available on the market. The first are called TVs and contain tuners. At this stage those tuners are all analog for UHF or VHF frequencies. The other type of display is a monitor, you can get 32, 40, 42, 46, 50 etc inch displays too
which do not contain tuners. I have one of those. I rely only on the DSTV decoder for TV and a DVD player (BD player, VHS machine) to watch stuff on
that monitor. You do not need a TV licence to buy a display without a tuner.
However none of these displays is analog. What they are have are digital or analog inputs but the circuitry inside converts incoming analog signal into digital, processes it and then outputs it to the panel.
What the guy means by analog is that there is no digital TV receiver present in any of these TVs. Since the South African standard hasn't been finalised yet, TVs with such receivers may not have worked in the future anyway. Secondly what the guy doesn't mention is that many people rich enough to afford a big screen TV at R10K plus can also afford a DSTV subscription and watch DSTV instead of SABC and ETV or MNET terrestrial. A set top box will not cost a fortune and will probably provide a digital connection (HDMI) to the
panel anyway.
Basically he should be telling people that SABC is now doing what MC did 10 years ago when they introduced DSTV. That was the same PAL signal
but without analog reception issues. A digital signal is either received or not,
its an all or nothing scenario for much of the reception singal quality spectrum, say the signal strength is only 60% of what it should be, the picture will still be fine, but maybe when it drops to 59% you'll have NO SIGNAL. Meanwhile analog signal will only look good at say 100-90% of the strength, then as the strength declines there will be interference lines across the screen and perhaps audio distorsion until at say 0% there will be no signal at all. People living in a 70% signal area will get worse quality than DSTV which will still look perfect while their signal will suck because of lines and audio distortion.
The other issue is that digital picture is compressed when transmitted.
This for DSTV is MPEG2. Since SABC will employ MPEG4 we may see fewer
intra frame compression artefacts - they look like blocky picture. However,
SABC may decide to not provide enough bandwidth and the better compression may still look cr@p and have compression artefacts.