genetic
Honorary Master
Not true. With 1080i two consecutive frames are carried in the 1920 x 1080 resolution (normally at about half the frame rate of a progressive image). Each alternate line belongs to a different frame. When the image is static these 2 consecutive frames are used to build a full 1080p image. As soon as that image starts moving, this can't be done and the resolution drops to 1920 x 540, because line doubling is used during de-interlacing. Saying that both 1080i/p is the same resolution is completely wrong. Had this whole argument with another guy in another thread recently.
Yes, it takes two consecutive 1080i frames to make a full 1920x1080 frame, however it's normally shown at double the frame rate or the same frame rate of a progressive frame. You don't get 25i - only 50i, as each field is shown in succession to generate a complete image.
De-interlacing does result in quality loss as you say - maybe I wasn't as clear as I should've been - hence why I said progressive frames have numerous advantages over the interlaced counterpart.