Helen Zille - Looking Forward

w1z4rd

Karmic Sangoma
Joined
Jan 17, 2005
Messages
52,146
Reaction score
8,340
Location
127.0.0.1
SA Today: Looking Forward

Helen Zille
Leader of the DA

It is often said that the rear view mirror is clearer than the windscreen. It is easy to look back and say what could have been, what course of action we should have taken. It is much harder to press forward – particularly when the road ahead is obscured and littered with obstacles.

Moving forward in uncertain terrain is the risk we take to achieve great things. Sometimes the risk pays off, and sometimes it doesn’t. But that doesn’t mean we shouldn’t try.

For the past twenty years South African political life has been dominated by one party. This dominance is at the root of many of the problems our society faces. Corruption at the highest level of government goes unchecked, our criminal justice system is rapidly eroding and there is no urgency in government to tackle the jobs crisis. All this is because Jacob Zuma’s ANC believes it will be returned to power, no matter what.

If we are to build a better South Africa, we need to break the dominance of one party. We need to do it while the institutions of our democracy such as the electoral commission, the courts, the police, the army and the public broadcaster are still, by-and-large, independent from the party in power. We don’t have time on our side. In fact, South Africa’s democracy is in a race against time.

That is why I have invested such an enormous amount of time and effort into what we call the realignment of politics – the idea that we must build the strongest possible, non-racial, broad-based alternative to break the political stranglehold that is choking our young democracy. Practically, it means like-minded parties and individuals coming together under one umbrella to challenge Jacob Zuma’s ANC for power.

When my discussions began with Dr Ramphele in 2010 and became formal negotiations 18 months ago, we knew that, whatever happened, we were taking a risk. On the one hand, we knew that South Africa’s interests would be served by working with Dr Ramphele, instead of against her. As Agang’s policies emerged, we saw there were hardly any major differences with DA policy, so the move made sense. And all our polling showed how much the voters want a strong, united, non-racial alternative.

Then again, on the other hand, we knew from bitter experience that mergers in politics are notoriously difficult, that the chances of failure are high. But we had to take the risk. Because that is what you do when you aim to achieve great things.

As most people now know, the merger didn’t work out. Last night, Dr Ramphele went back on an agreement reached exactly one week ago that she would stand as the DA’s Presidential Candidate, and that the structures of her party would be incorporated into the DA.

Dr Ramphele has her reasons for reneging on the deal. Whatever they are, they will be cold comfort to the many South Africans who saw the political possibilities when we announced we were joining forces last Tuesday.

As the Leader of the Democratic Alliance, I feel wholly responsible for what happened. Last Friday I met with the broader DA leadership at our Federal Executive to make the case for this merger. There was a strong majority in favour of taking this risk in the best interests of our country.

It is easy now to gaze into the rear view mirror to see where it all went wrong. Perhaps we shouldn’t have agreed to her insistence that we announce the next day. Our agreement was clear and unambiguous. I wrote it down and repeated it twice: “Dr Ramphele will become the DA’s Presidential Candidate and a technical task team will manage the incorporation of Agang’s branches, members, and volunteers into the DA”. There has never been any dispute that this was the agreement. Last night Mamphela accepted that this was our agreement, but she could not bring her party on board. That is the real reason why this failed.

All along we agreed that the potential reward of realignment far outweighed the risk of failure. The risk we took in merging with the Independent Democrats worked very well. Our merger with Agang did not.

I deeply regret that we were not more cautious in our dealings with Dr Ramphele. For that, I am sincerely sorry.

Our job now is to look ahead, through the windscreen, at the road ahead. There is an election on the near horizon. We are ready to roll out the biggest and best campaign ever waged by an opposition party in the history of our democracy. We will keep moving forward, taking our offer to the voters, and playing our part to fundamentally realign South African politics.

https://www.facebook.com/DemocraticAlliance/posts/10151953784773111:0

She has accepted responsibility and apologized. She does have some good points that are worth considering. I really hope we can keep focused on the really important issues.
 
Last edited:
I will probably still vote DA (because there is no other party even worth considering), but this has severely shaken my faith in the DA's foreward thinking and planning.
It is a major mis step for them and particularly damaging right before an election. The upshot is that the DA now looks like a "fly by the seat of their pants" party.
And that is not at all who we want in government.

Having said that though, they are still a thousand times better than any of the other political parties.
 
I can't believe that people sincerely trust politicians. It baffles me to see that!
 
I can't believe that people sincerely trust politicians. It baffles me to see that!

Where did anyone say that? I haven't seen a single person on this forum say that.
Can you show us even just one post where someone said that?
 
Where did anyone say that? I haven't seen a single person on this forum say that.
Can you show us even just one post where someone said that?

I'm not accusing anyone, I'm just drawing my own conclusion.
 
Where did anyone say that? I haven't seen a single person on this forum say that.
Can you show us even just one post where someone said that?

I assume he is maybe talking about Zille trusting Ramphele ... (because nobody posted trusting them politicians.).
 
I'm not accusing anyone, I'm just drawing my own conclusion.

OK well I do agree with you, anybody would be a fool to trust a politician wholeheartedly... I just haven't seen anybody here doing that.
 
OK well I do agree with you, anybody would be a fool to trust a politician wholeheartedly... I just haven't seen anybody here doing that.

I have seen people think DA politicians are better than ANC politicians. It's like Christians in America thinking Republicans politicians are better than Democratic politicians. It baffles me every time.
 
I have seen people think DA politicians are better than ANC politicians. It's like Christians in America thinking Republicans politicians are better than Democratic politicians. It baffles me every time.

... only when it comes to wacky religious thinking.
 
For the past twenty years South African political life has been dominated by one party. This dominance is at the root of many of the problems our society faces.
I don't understand. If the problem is one party dominance then why is she trying to create one party to dominate as opposition instead of multiple parties in a coalition? The idea that we must build the strongest possible, non-racial, broad-based alternative instead of multiple alternatives (more choice) makes no sense. Dominance by two parties is really not that much of a far cry from dominance by one.
 
The madam has got a half a point. Two parties gives you a choice. One party does not. There are quite a few big democracies out there with only 2 thorough breeds in the race. In SA we should have only 2 big parties: the ANC and EFF
 
The madam has got a half a point. Two parties gives you a choice. One party does not. There are quite a few big democracies out there with only 2 thorough breeds in the race. In SA we should have only 2 big parties: the ANC and EFF

:D You definitely deserve a party like the eff to rule over you.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X