Hijacker Killer labelled a racist

R/SGT

Expert Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2006
Messages
1,609
Reaction score
3
Hijackers’ killer has no regrets

Marc Ishlove, the police reservist who shot dead two hijackers at shopping centre last week, says he did what he had to to save innocent lives.

Despite being labelled a gunslinging racist on radio call-in shows, the experienced reservist and firearms trainer told The Times he believed he did the right thing.

A financial adviser by profession, Ishlove advocates for South Africans to arm themselves against criminals “willing to kill at all cost”.
Ishlove shot and killed two would-be hijackers at Fir Drive Centre in Northcliff, Johannesburg last week.

The two armed men in trench coats and leather gloves approached Elmarie Wypkema, 41, and demanded she hand over her wedding ring and luxury red Porsche. When she refused, there was a struggle and Wypkema and her attacker fell to the ground.

Her attacker then held a gun to her neck threatening to kill her.
Ishlove, who was at nearby restaurant, witnessed this and rushed to Wypkema’s aid. He got himself in a position for a clear shot at the hijacker, who was leaning over Wypkema, and fired once, hitting the man in the side.
When the hijacker fell over and raised his weapon, Ishlove fired another shot into his chest. Immediately afterwards there was another shot, which narrowly missed Ishlove, who realised there was a second assailant already in the Porsche.

Ishlove fired one shot, killing the man instantly.

Ishlove said: “It was instinct and my training that came into play because I was almost within point-blank range of the attackers. I saw everything in a clear perspective. He [the hijacker in the Porsche] missed, but I didn’t.”
Dubbed by some as an insensitive man, Ishlove said his actions were justified and did not see any reason to show remorse for having killed the men.

Ishlove said: “I was able to stop these men from killing innocent people, and if I should be showing any pity for these criminals, then I’m sorry I won’t. It’s not that I killed innocent people.”

With more than 30 years’ experience as a police reservist, Ishlove said it was imperative people understand that the actions he took were in the defence of other lives, as well as his own.

He said: “We should not get this twisted … this is not about killing people, it’s about defending lives. The defence was proportionate to the attack because these men were armed with guns that were fully loaded and they were prepared to use them.”

Ishlove said: “You don’t have to wait to get shot at before you can defend yourself.”

http://www.thetimes.co.za/News/Article.aspx?id=647927

Check out this idiots comment ( He was the only one ) :mad:

SINGISWATIM said at Dec 3 2007 1:35PM
The gun laws were not observed here and this cold-blooded murderer must be arrested and go explain in court that he acxted within the laws since i believe he was induced by hatred of blacks and not fighting crime since he has no record of fighting his colleagues crimes.

the suspects posed no threat to no-one and the gun was produced as a last resort to deter the victim and it therefore is imperative that the gun was not to shoot her but to get her to obey the order to hand over her ring.

this cop was in no life threatening danger to can shoot fatally.according to the gun laws he should have communicated with the suspects before shooting and introducing himself as a cop and ordered them or him to drop the gun he did not do so so i laud the icd for undertaking to shall do follow-up to obtain their details so that their families can be tracked down and encouraged to instruct the icd to bring charges against this terrorist.
 
I think he should have said drop the weapon or something, tough call....
 
I think he should have said drop the weapon or something, tough call....

I hope you are kidding, this is not the cops and robbers we play as kids, there is no fair play in real life.


Her attacker then held a gun to her neck threatening to kill her.
Ishlove, who was at nearby restaurant, witnessed this and rushed to Wypkema’s aid. He got himself in a position for a clear shot at the hijacker, who was leaning over Wypkema, and fired once, hitting the man in the side.
When the hijacker fell over and raised his weapon, Ishlove fired another shot into his chest. Immediately afterwards there was another shot, which narrowly missed Ishlove, who realised there was a second assailant already in the Porsche.

Ishlove fired one shot, killing the man instantly.

Her life was in mortal danger so he acted appropriately, and when the robber raised the weapon even after been shot he decide his fate and as for the other robber that was self-defence.

There was no tough call, he made the correct decision
 
SINGISWATIM said at Dec 3 2007 1:35PM
The gun laws were not observed here and this cold-blooded murderer must be arrested and go explain in court that he acxted within the laws since i believe he was induced by hatred of blacks and not fighting crime since he has no record of fighting his colleagues crimes.

the suspects posed no threat to no-one and the gun was produced as a last resort to deter the victim and it therefore is imperative that the gun was not to shoot her but to get her to obey the order to hand over her ring.

this cop was in no life threatening danger to can shoot fatally.according to the gun laws he should have communicated with the suspects before shooting and introducing himself as a cop and ordered them or him to drop the gun he did not do so so i laud the icd for undertaking to shall do follow-up to obtain their details so that their families can be tracked down and encouraged to instruct the icd to bring charges against this terrorist.

Yeah, and should he have introduced himself, they would have killed him and the woman as well... :rolleyes:

WTF is this schitte about communication and gun laws?
 
Sorry but I agree with what he did, I would do the same.

The Police have been ordered to "Shoot to kill" this after a huge rise in Cop killings. The days of a Gun wielding offender not being killed is gone. The gun law states that if a gun is taken out of it's holster, this is done with the intent to use it. If you have a gun wielded, anyone has the right to retaliate. ;)
 
yeah he made the right call.

im sorry that their are people there who dont see that we need to protect lifes.. if they want to use guns they die.

simple
 
kill or be killed, he saved a innocent woman's life and made SA a bit safer by killing two professional criminals.

(he should take Selebi's place)
 
Isnt there laws that state you have to warned the person, 3 warning shots or something.... I know its stupid, but if that law exists then he disobeyed it.
 
Isnt there laws that state you have to warned the person, 3 warning shots or something.... I know its stupid, but if that law exists then he disobeyed it.

Not if the person is wielding a gun.

This is done if the guy is posing a danger like having a knive to someones throat. Or having a gun but is to far from anyone to make a fatal shot.

Think the range on that is about 10 meters, any thing closer and I can shoot without asking.
 
I say stop the shooting to kill, wound him/them and then necklace him/them
 
Isnt there laws that state you have to warned the person, 3 warning shots or something.... I know its stupid, but if that law exists then he disobeyed it.

C'mon, criminals does not play fair.

As soon as the gun is out of the holster, then the intent to use it is there. You don't need to point it at people, the fact that the gun is not holstered means that you can fire at will.
 

Check out this idiots comment ( He was the only one ) :mad:

SINGISWATIM said at Dec 3 2007 1:35PM
The gun laws were not observed here and this cold-blooded murderer must be arrested and go explain in court that he acxted within the laws since i believe he was induced by hatred of blacks and not fighting crime since he has no record of fighting his colleagues crimes.

the suspects posed no threat to no-one and the gun was produced as a last resort to deter the victim and it therefore is imperative that the gun was not to shoot her but to get her to obey the order to hand over her ring.

this cop was in no life threatening danger to can shoot fatally.according to the gun laws he should have communicated with the suspects before shooting and introducing himself as a cop and ordered them or him to drop the gun he did not do so so i laud the icd for undertaking to shall do follow-up to obtain their details so that their families can be tracked down and encouraged to instruct the icd to bring charges against this terrorist.


I'm not surprised, Trolls are everywhere...
 
Isnt there laws that state you have to warned the person, 3 warning shots or something.... I know its stupid, but if that law exists then he disobeyed it.

It's one warning shot, AFAIK. In situation though, the perpetrator was already holding a gun to someones neck. It could be safely assumed, that the intent was to kill. Giving a warning shot, might have caused the perpetrator to discharge his gun by accident or on purpose.
 
Anyone accusing Marc Ishlove of racism should ask themselves how they come to that conclusion, if it is because Marc is non-black and by default an anti-black racist? An idiot continuing such accusations should be shot also.
The man is a financial advisor, trust me when I say he makes the correct decision under pressure.
He did not shoot any other black people standing around did he? Only the people using guns and the threat of death were shot.
Well done Marc.
 
"SINGISWATIM" is probably a hijacker, himself
:)
 
Marc had a few seconds to make his decision and he made the right one.
 
So he is a troll just because he has a skewed perception or viewpoint of reality and his views do not agree with the rest?
No, hes a troll because he called a man a terrorist [does Ishlove go around killing black criminals everyday? yes/no, well "SINGISWATIM" doesn't know that and has no grounds for calling Islove a terrorist] and due to the fact that he writes incoherently. Trolls take normal valid points and mix them with farfetched crap...
 
Right decision, he should be given a medal for risking his life to help a stranger
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X