Hlophe Tribunal to Proceed

No, the complaint comes directly from the concourt.




Hlophe v Constitutional Court of South Africa and Others (08/22932) [2008] ZAGPHC 289 (25 September 2008) (saflii.org)

LOL, there's even a section in the Concourt Wikipedia entry, dealing with the Hlophe saga: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_...interference_with_Constitutional_Court_Judges
 
No, the complaint comes directly from the concourt.




Hlophe v Constitutional Court of South Africa and Others (08/22932) [2008] ZAGPHC 289 (25 September 2008) (saflii.org)
I know but he's claiming the reason proxy for his investigation and findings of racism within the judiciary in general.
 
Zapiro's version:

201209dm-1000x699.jpg
 
Last edited:
As the complaint came from all the Con Court judges he wont be appealing there :laugh:
 
I still wonder if he received a few brown envelopes.

What was his motivation if not money?
I think he was eyeing the top job in the judiciary when Zuma ascended. He unfortunately shot himself in the foot with that conduct and when Zuma came into his power Hlophe was too tainted a consideration for CJ.
 
Superb news. What is the next step and who needs to impeach this s1ht? Did I miss reading that in article? :unsure:

He can be suspended by the president, but (like the PP) impeachment by parliament could take a decade:
Doubtless the usual suspects will defend Judge Hlophe even as the logic of the finding makes such a defence totally impossible to mount on any plausible basis. In the meantime, the JSC must surely recommend to the president immediate suspension of Judge Hlophe from judicial office. The process of repairing the damage to the judicial institution caused by this unfortunate saga must now commence.
 
I think impeachment goes to parliament and the whims of ANC factionalism.

The Tribunal will forward their findings and recommendations back to the JSC, the JSC will then determine if conditions for impeachment are met and forward it on to the national assembly which requires a 2/3 majority vote after which el presidente can remove him.

EDIT: Keep in mind the JSC ignored a previous Tribunal recommending judge Motata be impeached...
 
Last edited:
The Tribunal will forward their findings and recommendations back to the JSC, the JSC will then determine if conditions for impeachment are met and forward it on to the national assembly which requires a 2/3 majority vote after which el presidente can remove him.

EDIT: Keep in mind the JSC ignored a previous Tribunal recommending judge Motata be impeached...

Detailed analysis of why this is much more serious than the Motata case:
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X