HOME CIRCUMCISION GOES WRONG

Garyvdh said:
That's even more weird then.
Click to expand...

That you can't read? No after all this time I'm come to accept it. :D ;)

Well quite a few people here speak from the POV of people who are circumcised who want their foreskins back. I'm someone who thinks life would be easier without one but aren't prepared for the op at this late stage of the game.
 
Fudzy said:
Well quite a few people here speak from the POV of people who are circumcised who want their foreskins back.
Click to expand...

Not quite. I speak from my own perspective - that of someone who would like to see the practice brought to light as the abusive money-spinner it is.

You've become completely stuck on what an organisation chooses to call itself, which has never been anything but irrelevant. The information I linked you to could have been on www.barneythepurpledinosaur.com - if it is well backed up and referenced the source matters not. It's the same type of idjit-argument than that Wikipedia isn't trustworthy; if you take issue with the info provided it's easy enough to double-check the references.
 
enigma243 said:
Not quite. I speak from my own perspective - that of someone who would like to see the practice brought to light as the abusive money-spinner it is.

You've become completely stuck on what an organisation chooses to call itself, which has never been anything but irrelevant. The information I linked you to could have been on www.barneythepurpledinosaur.com - if it is well backed up and referenced the source matters not. It's the same type of idjit-argument than that Wikipedia isn't trustworthy; if you take issue with the info provided it's easy enough to double-check the references.
Click to expand...

It seems you're the one that is stuck, I moved on. Question for the cut pro-uncircumcised people here, if you could go back in time and change the decision, would you?
 
Fudzy said:
It seems you're the one that is stuck, I moved on. Question for the cut pro-uncircumcised people here, if you could go back in time and change the decision, would you?
Click to expand...

and this has what to do with the price of tea in China?

Why are you so desperately obsessed with everyone's personal information and opinions? It isn't going to contribute anything to the discussion.
 
Fudzy said:
It seems you're the one that is stuck, I moved on. Question for the cut pro-uncircumcised people here, if you could go back in time and change the decision, would you?
Click to expand...

This surely must go down as one of the most idiotic questions you've ever posed. Of course anyone opposed to it would kindly request not to be mutilated and to rather have that choice be their own. It doesn't however translate to "I want my foreskin back now" which is what you're aiming at...
 
porchrat said:
I didn't get the impression that you guys were speaking for the dudes that want their foreskins back.
Click to expand...

Certainly not. In fact imo those who want it back are as nutty as those pro birth-circumcision.

Fudzy is being difficult once again. One cannot change the past and I am okay with that. I can however take a stand against it moving forward - I'm not sure how he understands this as "I want my foreskin back." :confused:
 
porchrat said:
and this has what to do with the price of tea in China?

Why are you so desperately obsessed with everyone's personal information and opinions? It isn't going to contribute anything to the discussion.
Click to expand...

I was replying to Garyvdh if you don't mind. Why doe discussing this upset you so?
 
Fudzy said:
I was replying to Garyvdh if you don't mind. Why doe discussing this upset you so?
Click to expand...

Actually you asked a blanket question that wasn't directed at Gary. Don't be silly now and pretend you didn't. You know it was that part that I was asking about.

EDIT: Also it doesn't upset me. You're reading emotion into it where there isn't any... again. All I wanted to know was what purpose the information you would receive would serve. None that I can see. It is a perfectly reasonable logical and well thought out question... not a rapidly formed emotive one. Duh.
 
porchrat said:
Actually you asked a blanket question that wasn't directed at Gary. Don't be silly now and pretend you didn't. You know it was that part that I was asking about.

EDIT: Also it doesn't upset me. You're reading emotion into it where there isn't any... again. All I wanted to know was what purpose the information you would receive would serve. None that I can see. It is a perfectly reasonable logical and well thought out question... not a rapidly formed emotive one. Duh.
Click to expand...

Well you got quite snotty about it the first time I asked. The reason I ask is simply to see if they would rather be circumcised or not circumcised, whether their argument is about the procedure or the finished product basically.
 
DJ... said:
Certainly not. In fact imo those who want it back are as nutty as those pro birth-circumcision.

Fudzy is being difficult once again. One cannot change the past and I am okay with that. I can however take a stand against it moving forward - I'm not sure how he understands this as "I want my foreskin back." :confused:
Click to expand...

See the reasoning to my question.
 
Fudzy said:
Well you got quite snotty about it the first time I asked. The reason I ask is simply to see if they would rather be circumcised or not circumcised, whether their argument is about the procedure or the finished product basically.
Click to expand...

Why do you assume someone's argument has to stem from personal experiences and desires? :confused:

You've been doing this the entire thread and I really don't understand this. Do you think everyone is subjective and nobody can approach anything with objectivity?

EDIT: like I said: what does this have to do with the price of tea in China?
 
Fudzy said:
whether their argument is about the procedure or the finished product basically.
Click to expand...

At what point during any of this was the cosmetic argument used as a reason against it? :confused:

You're running out of straw...
 
porchrat said:
Why do you assume someone's argument has to stem from personal experiences and desires? :confused:

You've been doing this the entire thread and I really don't understand this. Do you think everyone is subjective and nobody can approach anything with objectivity?

EDIT: like I said: what does this have to do with the price of tea in China?
Click to expand...

@ Fudzy: In fact your very own argument clearly does not stem from your own personal experiences and desires... because you haven't been circumcised... why do you assume everyone else's arguments do? :confused:
 
DJ... said:
At what point during any of this was the cosmetic argument used as a reason against it? :confused:

You're running out of straw...
Click to expand...

Why don't you answer my question first?

You seem to like the straw comment as much as seeing your own posts judging by your post count.
 
porchrat said:
@ Fudzy: In fact your very own argument clearly does not stem from your own personal experiences and desires... because you haven't been circumcised... why do you assume everyone else's arguments do? :confused:
Click to expand...

You know it's quite pathetic to go by and edit your posts to suit what I've said further on AND THEN continue to comment, quotinig your own posts even.

It's evident no matter what I tell you is going to make any difference to what you think so you have done nothing other than prove that like DJ... you like seeing your post count grow otherwise you would have just said "this has been discussed before in the other circumcision thread" right at the beginning.
 
Well you could always sue your parents, doctor & hospital if it was done without your consent. There is not one medical/paediatric association out there that advocates the procedure.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X