biometrics
Honorary Master
- Joined
- Aug 7, 2003
- Messages
- 71,856
- Reaction score
- 2,239
It's not like a threw rocks at others or anything. :twisted:
/bombs
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
It's not like a threw rocks at others or anything. :twisted:
Woolworths having a sale?/runs away
Woolworths having a sale?
Good times/runs back
Check which three is definitely true and pick the one that is left over.This is the one I struggled with:
Which ONE of the following statements is NOT true?
1.**An interactive web page might contain code that can be executed
2.**Flash-applets might be part of a static web page
3.**A static web page can be interactive
4.**Facebook is a dynamic website
I guess its the terminology used that confuses me
This is the one I struggled with:
Which ONE of the following statements is NOT true?
1.**An interactive web page might contain code that can be executed
2.**Flash-applets might be part of a static web page
3.**A static web page can be interactive
4.**Facebook is a dynamic website
I guess its the terminology used that confuses me
Check which three is definitely true and pick the one that is left over.
Aaah. I just assumed that if it has a form and submit button it would be interactive
You shouldn't over think the departments' questions. Been there, done that, marked wrong![]()
No, because when you click on the submit button, the request gets sent back to the web server and you get served another static page.Aaah. I just assumed that if it has a form and submit button it would be interactive
No, because when you click on the submit button, the request gets sent back to the web server and you get served another static page.
If it contains JavaScript, then it contains code that can be executed and would be interactive, like 1.I disagree, if there is JavaScript on the page, it can be technically still be static and interactive
If it contains JavaScript, then it contains code that can be executed and would be interactive, like 1.
10/10
View attachment 211790
Funny that the last question actually included an explanation of what the code does. It kind of defeats the purpose of the question, it seems.