kaspaas
Expert Member
If Telkom's network architecture is expensive, more expensive than in the rest of the world, why should the users be penalised?
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Byrd said:3. Considering that Telkom charges over R2000 for a router that is not nearly as feature full as those that retail in the free market for around R500 - Do you expect forum members to believe that Telkom is not ripping them off in other areas as well?
4. Do you beleive Telkom is Ripping us off and making huge profits?
5. Considering that Telkom was initialy a state owned entity - do you beleive that it is fair that it is now treated in a way that denies this history - ie as a normal business entity?
ayanda said:Am sorry to spoilt the party. But the ICASA report appears not to have been written by anyone with any idea on network designn architecture. The ADSL network beyond local exchange is seperate from the voice network.
The line rental cover network maintainance of the local loop . but adsl access is more than local loop. If Telkom rolls out DSLAMs + ATM network + ESSR exchanges and hands over the traffic to the ISPs IP networks beyond that , who is to pay for the intemediary network , if they are not allowed to charge adsl access ? Who is to pay for ongoing maintanance and upgrades of such ?
I would be suprised if they dont halt their broadband rollout if the CAPEX and OPEX is not recoverable !!!!!!!
tsjones said:The UK model works like this: BT charges the ISP a wholesale price of ~15 UKP (last time I was there - this is now more like 10 UKP or less) for providing a 512k(1024k these days?) connection between the clients equipment and the ISPs equipment. There are no restrictions on this link - eat as much as you like on any port. It is also not an internet service. The ISP then adds an internet link (they have their own pipes leased from whoever gives them the best deal) and email, news etc to this connection and sells it to the client for 5-10 UKP more. Any caps are introduced by the ISP - not BT. Most do not have any caps, or would offer an uncapped service for 5 UKP more.
So from this model we can assume that BT makes a profit on providing the local loop at R150 or less. And this in a country where all costs are considerably more than here. A regular technician will in all probability earn more than R200 000/annum.
Compare that to the SA model: Telkom asks ~R500 for the local loop and an additional ~R250 for the internet/email. And that R250 only buys a capped and shaped service, and you know all the rest. Summary: at least 4 times more expensive in every area for a service that is vastly inferior.
And the argument regularly used is that our international bandwidth costs are so expensive. That has nothing to do with the local loop. No wonder Telkom has recently been harping on the high cost of maintaining the local loop. Taken into account that our labour costs are so much less and Telkom and BT buy their hardware on the same market, our adsl local loop should cost less than R100/month. Given that the voice circuit is R90/month that is about right.
The model changes once the local loop is unbundled of course – for the better of the client.
Side note: Why can some ISPs offer you 30GB for R600 and Telkom charges R250 for 3GB?
You would be surprised what people believe when their eyes have been closed for so long.jeinnor30 said:aayanda probable does work for Telkom, who in their right mind would defend them saying that what they offer is free and fair. Dumb ass
eye_suc said:i was really looking forward to an honest answer from ayanda.
Byrd said:Now as to your comments and the topic - have you got any valid input here - either for or against Ayanda's arguments - or are you here simply to blow your own little trumpet as to the way you beleive the forum should respond to certain issues.
Dastrix said:I think we need to tread lightly here - not that I for one care what a Telkom mole would think, but we should try and avoid the follwing situation:
It's a game for the public eye of the regulator and the DOC, we need to be careful. Message board tactics will not work in this space.