nelwa
Expert Member
wow, only R3mil, that's pathetic...glad they didn't ask me...
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
I'm writing them another rude email about this costing three million! #%(@*#$@ and I'm supposed to file my tax return soon - can I deduct government stupidity?
I have noted your concerns unfortunately the website does not work on any other browser other than Internet Explorer unless you know how to fake Internet Explorer from the other browsers.
We are aware of the cross-browser compatibility problem and we are working on resolving it as soon as possible.
To us the website is but just one of the communication channels at our available, it is not the only one, it is complementary to number of other channels, so if you want to link it to your right to vote, though unfortunate but it remains your choice there is very little I can do about it.
Libisi Maphanga, chief information officer at the IEC, says, however, that the organisation is "well aware" of the problems with the website and the complaints from users and has in place a project team to rectify the situation.
Maphanga told Tectonic this morning that a "project team" had be set up to fix the problem and it was expected to have the first phase of the all-access website up and running by January 2009. A second phase was expected to add more content by April 2009, just in time for the national elections.
The project to make the website available to all users will cost around R3 million, says Maphanga. He says that because of a growing "campaign" from disgruntled citizens complaining about the website and the "disruption to our regular work" this was causing, other projects have been put on hold so that budget could be allocated to fixing the website. The IEC also applied for supplemental funding from government for the website but this was denied.
I'm writing them another rude email about this costing three million! #%(@*#$@ and I'm supposed to file my tax return soon - can I deduct government stupidity?
Hey, let's do it for 2 mil. 1mil for the BEE partner. 100K for the guys doing the work and 900k for the rest of us.
Actually I'm sure there will probably be some infrastructure costs (load balanced servers, hosting, software, etc.)
I've taken a look at their site and can easily fix their terrible mistakes and mess-ups at a cost of far less than R3 million...
I'm missing something (again)
I've just accessed the site to check whether I'm registered and i'm using FF.
What is the problem I should have encountered?
The company involved should be named and shamed for such rubbish..![]()
Client: Independent Electoral Commission (IEC)
Image
Client Description: The Electoral Commission of South Africa is a permanent body created by the Constitution to promote and safeguard democracy in South Africa. Although publicly funded and accountable to parliament, the Commission is independent of the government. Its immediate task is the impartial management of free and fair elections at all levels of government.
URL: [www.iec.org.za]
Industry: Government
Project: 1999 National Election Centre
Project Description: Technical Infrastructure design, implementation, testing and support for the Election Centre operations for the 1999 South African National Election.
Dates Assigned to Project: April 1999 to July 1999
Role: Technical Security Specialist
Technologies Used :-
Programming Language: ASP, Visual Basic 6
Application Server: DCOM on IIS
Database: MS SQL
Hardware: HP Intel
Operating System: Windows NT 4.0
Other: Microsoft Office, Checkpoint Firewall, Windows Load Balancer
Project Outcomes: The National Elections was succesfully concluded without any major incident.
They have been, it's accenture.
http://www.divinityconsulting.com/content/view/30/1/
Edit: Sorry, that description looks like it's for the IT infrastructure for the elections themselves, not the website. Anyway, accenture were also responsible for the website.
Dear Raoul Snyman
The real problem is that this has turned into a campaign and not an honest concern about our difficulties, such that it is trivializing the problems we are having.
Do yourself a favour look beyond appearance, understand the problem and stop the pretence. Your 5 minutes solution is naïve to say the least.
I know what we are dealing with, while concerned what led us to this situation but I am convinced that the interim measure we have implemented and the remedial action we are developing is correct.
Regards
Libisi Maphanga
Chief Information Officer
The real problem is that this has turned into a campaign and not an honest concern about our difficulties, such that it is trivializing the problems we are having.
Do yourself a favour look beyond appearance, understand the problem and stop the pretence. Your 5 minutes solution is naïve to say the least.
I know what we are dealing with, while concerned what led us to this situation but I am convinced that the interim measure we have implemented and the remedial action we are developing is correct.
The main problem with the IEC is that their IT decisions are made for them by Accenture. I have known Libisi for many years and have a great deal of respect for the man, but unfortunately he isn’t the master of his own destiny... Well that part of his own destiny which impacts on IT systems at the IEC.
Most of the IT contract resources at the IEC are currently only comfortable with Dot Net. Of course these contract resources also happen, in most cases, to be Accenture resources.
I was told a few weeks ago that a team was busy working on a new IEC web site, but on deeper investigation I found out that nothing was actually happening. Someone is apparently investigating various CMS solutions, but as far as I know, nothing more is happening.
In response to the "CMS solution investigation", I have made a suggestion that Drupal, Joomla and/or Mambo be considered. Of course these solutions make the Accenture resources uncomfortable because a) They are open source and b) They are not Dot Net.
It is my very firm belief that Accenture's main interest in the IEC is to milk them (And subsequently the South African tax payer) for as much money as possible.
Ok, I can understand the problem. The website *was* steamrollered into place by fast-talking, highly paid consultants (who actually knew little about coding and the web and non-Microsoft environments). The bits of code done in VB *are* crucial - if I remember correctly, during the last elections, a view of the site in IE yielded very different results to when viewed in Konqueror or Mozilla.
Now, when you have a 'website', and you ask for money to rewrite it, chances are you won't be popular with your boss. And the budget of R3m? Those are the figures when you get a big consulting firm to come in and make your problem go away. Of course you could get a smaller company in, but then you would need to assess them to see whether they can do the job adequately, manage them (because they don’t have the smooth partner-types with Powerpoint slides to keep your boss feeling comfortable).
It's a sick world, I know.