South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Acting Judge N. Davis ruled on Friday that the Minister's application for Leave to Appeal would be refused on all points, with costs.
yes it isIsn't that supposed to read 19 July 2006 as opposed to 19 July 2008?
does this mean, that if I work with a VANS license, I can run my own fibre/copper infrastructure?
Subject to correction by dominic, no it doesn't mean that news VANs will get an I-ECNS licence - it only applies to VANs that were previously disadvantaged under the Telecommunications Act of 1996 and that were licensed VANs prior to the promulgation of the Electronic Communications Act of 2005 [in 2006 IIRC], whose VANs licenses are yet to be converted [or rather their licence certificates issued] by !CASA according to the ECA.As far as I know, yes. However, you will first need to apply for and receive your new IECNS license from ICASA.
Subject to correction by dominic, no it doesn't mean that news VANs will get an I-ECNS licence - it only applies to VANs that were previously disadvantaged under the Telecommunications Act of 1996 and that were licensed VANs prior to the promulgation of the Electronic Communications Act of 2005 [in 2006 IIRC], whose VANs licenses are yet to be converted [or rather their licence certificates issued] by !CASA according to the ECA.
does this mean, that if I work with a VANS license, I can run my own fibre/copper infrastructure?
I foresee a new problem there - specifically the 'where to collect converted to I-ECNS licence certificates' - !CASA will say that the venue will be "the toilet attached to Poison Ivy's office at the DoC", and the 'when' will be when Poison Ivy has concluded her business in there.apologies - in a hurry so going to refer you to http://www.ellipsis.co.za/?p=370
ic is being correct
if your VANS was issued before 19.07. 2008 (and subject to the caveats you will find in the link above) then
- there is no need to apply for an IECNS...ICASA will just let you know when and where to collect it
- once you have the licence you can roll out almost any kind of network infrastructure you care to - copper, fibre, laser, wireless, string-and-tin-cans etc
Nope, it applies to legal entities and natural persons, i.e. registered companies and actual people, regardless of their BEE[E] status, provided that they were in possession of a VANs licence, which had been issued in their name, by !CASA, prior to 2008-07-19 [as posted by dominic], provided that the licence had not lapsed prior to 2005-02-01 and had been kept renewed, which in effect means that such legal entities and natural persons, that were classified as VANs, would have suffered under the oppressive monopoly of Telkodemonopolies which was protected [in particular] by Poison Ivy and Stalin-Mafole and Paris Mashile, and enshrined in the unjust and shameless legislation known as the Telecommunications Act of 1996 [which SBC and Telkodemonopolies and Jay Naidoo in particular had a hand in drafting behind the scenes]. Ergo, my description of such VANs, as having been previously disadvantaged under the oppression of the Telecommunications Act of 1996.but as ic stated, I must be previously disadvantaged? that means I need to be bee right? so all the licenses that are issued to us non-bee will be useless?
Yes, I should think so, subject to correction from dominic who is the de facto guru in such matters of all things telecoms relatedI see ic...
So, if I am teaming up with a company that has had a VANS license for several years, and it has been updated and renewed consitently, we can then enter into a joint venture?
I see ic...
So, if I am teaming up with a company that has had a VANS license for several years, and it has been updated and renewed consitently, we can then enter into a joint venture?