I saw a guy at work today shooting Sony.Switch to Sony my friend.... We've had this discussion![]()
We had a good laugh.
I saw a guy at work today shooting Sony.Switch to Sony my friend.... We've had this discussion![]()
Sony is the way, the truth and the lightCome on @Harmonic it is not that bad....
I still have all of my canon gear, but decided few years ago to add Fuji, more compact and easier to carry two bodies with two prime lenses.
Sony no matter how good to me money wise looked as Nikon with its Nikon tax compared to Canon.
Bit too expensive for my taste.
Now I realized that my Panasonic LX100 is my first stabilized camera.
Although from 2015 (got it quite recently in new condition) I carry it quite often and enjoy using it.
I can't take the ridicule - pulling out a Sony (even though superior) makes one feel like the red haired stepchild that lives in the broom cupboardI saw a guy at work today shooting Sony.
We had a good laugh.
Recreational photographers care a lot more about this stuff than people who do it for a living.It's always funny how the brand wars are so prominent in the camera community. It's almost religious.
True! Time is limited so for me so I generally prefer high end gear so that it doesn't get in the way (outcome is "me" dependent vs being gear dependent).Recreational photographers care a lot more about this stuff than people who do it for a living.
These days that's just as likely to come from having more powerful computers and better software to cull and edit with. Lenses and bodies are usable for years or even decades when it comes to the former.One would think professionals care about time savings even more though.
Did you know about Landy and Toyota warSony is the way, the truth and the lightIt's always funny how the brand wars are so prominent in the camera community. It's almost religious.
I'm just over half a bar deep in Sony gear so of course my investment was the best choice
That said, at the top end, I do believe Sony is "winning" with Canon a close second, at least from raw technical specs. Sony does tend to push the limits a bit more it seems. I don't follow too closely but Nikon and Fuji seem to have fallen behind a bit, especially in the AF department. I do believe at least one of them uses Sony sensors (can't remember which).
Fuji color science seems to have some type of cult following attached to it but raw images + processing can get any "look" you desire.
All that said, Sony does disappoint massively in firmware updates, especially on a $6500 camera. The video codecs are also awkward to work with. I would much rather prefer native prores like on the Nikons.
Unlike processionals us true artist only take few careful shots so time in creating masterpiece is not of essence.True! Time is limited so for me so I generally prefer high end gear so that it doesn't get in the way (outcome is "me" dependent vs being gear dependent).
One would think professionals care about time savings even more though. That said, it's not like anyone looking at your images is going to be like "wow that's so good! It was definitely shot on a Fuji XYZ with an ABC lens".
My hit to miss ratio as a sports photographer is 1:10... on a good day.Unlike processionals us true artist only take few careful shots so time in creating masterpiece is not of essence.
(I will start running now![]()
![]()
![]()
)
Now if you got the Sony your hit to miss ratio would be 5/10My hit to miss ratio as a sports photographer is 1:10... on a good day.![]()
This is a consequence of shooting slightly unpredictable things that move. Went to an airshow yesterday and had a similar ratio after culling. Looking at the photos I realized that the main feature of my next camera must be less EVF lag.My hit to miss ratio as a sports photographer is 1:10... on a good day.![]()
Sounds like you'd benefit from Canon's preshooting/pre-caputure mode.This is a consequence of shooting slightly unpredictable things that move. Went to an airshow yesterday and had a similar ratio after culling. Looking at the photos I realized that the main feature of my next camera must be less EVF lag.
Just dated this lens - manufactured mid 1992...Picked up a 300mm f/4 non-IS today so I might be testing the in-body stabilisation after all.
I think I might need a EOS R6 in my life next and not necessarily a mkII.
That's a fantastic price, congrats! What are you expecting to pay in import duties and VAT?Ordered my R6mk2 off Amazon... still no interest in RF lenses but In-Body IS is pretty handy.![]()
Thanks. I'm picking it up in the US at the end of the month.That's a fantastic price, congrats! What are you expecting to pay in import duties and VAT?
That is just the body though so standard price at Photo Discount World. An 18-150mm will set you back another R11k. I wish Canon would bundle it with the R100 and R50 instead of sticking with the outdated 18-45mm. Purchasing it separately will still set you back the same as an R10 where it could have been a good budget option.Orms is currently running a number of birthday specials including the Canon R7 (R 29,995.00) and R6mk2 (R 49,995.00) along with some lesser brands (Nikon and Sony)
![]()
Orms Birthday Specials
www.ormsdirect.co.za