Israel's war on the Arabic language

Yup, I have - and I have spoken to Israeli Arabs who laugh at what the stuff I've showed them that is reported and said here... I believe the one guy said that "when they come to South Africa, they are arabs from palestine, but as soon as they land back in Israel, they say they are Israelis and proud"... Also, on that point, in terms of this particular thread, we're talking about Tel Aviv and.. as you so clearly put it, Israel-Arabs and Israelis as a whole..
When you say you have, how long were you in the Occupied Territories, exactly?

I distinctly remember you saying that there is no way arabs use their children as human shields... then when presented with evidence.. you changed your mind, thats why I really wish you would go and at least see it for yourself..
Show where. I highly doubt your interpretation of my words is correct.

I choose not to comment on threads that I don't know about because when you assume things.. well.. you make an "A$$" out of yourself, but hey, that's just the way I view life - don't comment until you've seen for yourself :)
Rubbish. You wouldn't have made comments about my facebook and twitter pages then. And in case you're wondering, I have niether.

Good luck and have a good weekend!
You too.
 
Only cuz Nick is playing apologetics over the fact that the Tel Aviv municipality ignored a court order for 14 years. ;)

If he'd just admit that this was a problem, there wouldn't be any need to go into it. But Nick thinks Israel can do no wrong.

Holy smoke - how do you claim to be impartial but yet only attack Israel and Jewish folk? Sorry, I forgot about the USA.
 
The irony....
That wasn't irony. If the best they have is ad-hominems, I've got nothing to worry about. :)

Also, feel free to point to an ad-hominem argument I made.
 
Holy smoke - how do you claim to be impartial but yet only attack Israel and Jewish folk? Sorry, I forgot about the USA.
Where did I attack anybody on the grounds of their Jewishness? Lol.

I criticise people for what they do, not who they are, and nobody's perfect.

And I do not recall making any statements about my own impartiality.
 
For schits and giggles:

All of my arguments can be summed up as me arguing for my own best interest. You see, I don't exactly want the world to blow itself apart, because I rather need the planet in one piece.

As such, I think unneccessary warfare is stupid. I think denying people their right to self-determination is stupid. I think provoking a conflict for geopolitical ends is stupid, and I'm well aware that all sides pretty much do this all the time.

Nonetheless, the fact of the matter is that the world's economy is based on fiat monetary systems which have basically hit peak debt; I do think that the Dollar as reserve currency is coming to an end and I think that is going to result in a geopolitical paradigm shift.

I think it would have been better if Ukraine's govt. had never been overthrown by the USA and the EU and Russia could instead have talked out their differences. But the USA intentionally put a spanner in the works to stop the EU and Russia integrating economically. That economic integration would actually be better for the long-term wellbeing of the planet because countries that need each other tend to be too afraid to kill each other. So should I be irritated that the USA did this to secure their own position as top-dog of the planet? I think so. And I think all their other moves are similarly not in the general interest of people everywhere. Insofar as they are not, I speak out against them in the interest of people generally everywhere. I mean the USA does pretty much have global media dominance, a voice in the wilderness can't be all that threatening to their agitprop... :whistle:

And when the USA collapses, well, it would be better if Israel was on speaking terms with it's neighbours, wouldn't it? It would be better if it wasn't facing a domestic Arab revolt, wouldn't it? It's in Israel's interests to settle the Occupied Territories issue sooner rather than later, no?

And the simple truth is that from here on out, oil is going to be harder and harder to justify in terms of ERoEI and that's going to put a serious crimp in future economic growth. We simply can't carry on the way we have been; and when the current system falls to a lower energy state I want the descent to be as painless as possible. No more, no less.

Find one post that cannot be justified from this simple perspective, I dare you Splinter. ;)
 
Last edited:
Where did I attack anybody on the grounds of their Jewishness? Lol.

I criticise people for what they do, not who they are, and nobody's perfect.

And I do not recall making any statements about my own impartiality.

Bleh. You went quiet when it was pointed out quite clearly how you only focus on certain human rights issues. Then after you thought that had been forgotten, you popped in again to carry on your crusade. You are deceitful as far as I can tell. Any viewpoint you put forward is irrelevant to me.
 
Just one example - what is your definition of "dullard"? You know - that term you called me.

Let me help you a bit though:

a slow or stupid person.
"he was caricatured as a dupe and a dullard"
synonyms: idiot, fool, stupid person, simpleton, ignoramus, oaf, dunce, dolt, moron, cretin, imbecile;
 
Bleh. You went quiet when it was pointed out quite clearly how you only focus on certain human rights issues.
Where did I not address such baseless accusations?

Then after you thought that had been forgotten, you popped in again to carry on your crusade. You are deceitful as far as I can tell. Any viewpoint you put forward is irrelevant to me.
Lol. Okay sunshine. Carry on while I have fun at your expense.
 
P.S. Accusing me of being deceitful without presenting any proof is quintessentially an ad-hominem argument... ;)
 
Umm - ad hominem is just attacking a person. Insult fits in that category. But, glad you agree that it was an insult. How did the infraction feel?
No.

And even if you were correct, I in each case said "ad-hominem argument". To call you a dullard is not to make an argument.
 
P.S. Accusing me of being deceitful without presenting any proof is quintessentially an ad-hominem argument... ;)

Blurp. I am guessing you have no life at all? Anyway. As I said before - no respect for you and consider you deceitful.

So - once again - carry on talking to yourself ;)
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X