airborne
Honorary Master
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2007
- Messages
- 28,464
- Reaction score
- 14,754
Why not tell James to come tell his version of the story, you clearly know the guy?I agree @ITworkup has the right to defend themself airborne but what I don’t agree with is that everyone is jumping on their side only without this James guy having said his piece. It’s like being in a relationship with a person and things ending. You will always be the bad person in someone’s story. With everything there is always two sides and we are only hearing the one side. I am not challenging what @ITworkup is saying as they have full right. What I am challenging is that all we are hearing is one side of the story with their facts that they are posting that could be considered hearsay and not the other side.
airborne, let’s say we were involved in a car accident and I bumped into you and admitted my fault and this ended up in court. Now let’s say in court I suddenly appear wearing a neck brace and arm sling and bandages on my head and I say you intentionally reversed into me and I’m claiming it’s you that caused the accident. The judge will see me in a neck brace and arm sling and bandages and his immediate thought will be what? That I’m the victim because of how I appeared? My side of the story would be it was intentional from you. The judge now asks you for your side and all you can say is I bumped into you and admitted at the accident scene. Do you have witnesses to back up that I said that? No. What would the outcome be seeing as I was there looking like I was dragged through hell and you were in perfect health?
What I’m getting at is we only have one side of the story, where is the other side. 1 + 0 doesn’t not make 2 here.
I’m not trying to be the bad guy here. All I’m saying is at the end of the day with all this being said we are only hearing the one side.
The way James threw all the ITworkup customers under the bus by disabling the domain and hanging them out to dry did not reflect well on his intentions, this thread has had many distraught people trying to make sense of what happened. If James has been determined to do the right thing then why treat the innocent customers so poorly, it doesn't add up?
Last edited: