have the results of the case been announced so we can ascertain whether they are breaking the law?
No the courtcase has been postponed apprently by request of Universal - the rumour is that Fox, Disney, Paramount, Warner Brothers etc are also joining the courtcase against Mr Video. Remember Universal Studios is suing Mr Video, not SK ad NM. Also remember the release dates are set by the studios not NM SK.
And yes they are definately breaking the law. I refer again to the DTI regulations as in my previous post - "In the majority of cases middlemen are appointed by their foreign principals as the exclusive importers of the principal's product. Most of the parallel importation in South Africa is done through middlemen or licensed importers. The middlemen, it must be noted, is an independent businessman and is not controlled by the manufacturer. The effect of the license is that it allows the licensee i.e. the middleman, to have access and exclusive importation rights of the manufacture's products while at the same time it guarantees the manufacturer access to the market. In return the licensed importers assume certain obligations such as marketing, after-sales and protection of the goodwill acquired, by ensuring consumer protection and satisfaction. " In other words the studios has a contract with SK and NM who are the middlemen and has given SK and NM the right (licenses) to distribute in S.A. SK and NM has paid the studios for this right and the contracts are renewed on a regular basis (not sure exactly what the time frame is). Mr Video and others like them bypass the local distributor who has the licence to distribute for the manufaturer and buys direct from overseas and then distributes here in there stores sometimes even before it has been released to theater.
And in response to Albereth - A lack of morals, a disregard for peoples' rights and the law is the reason why our country is in the state it is. It seems we have completely forgotten what it is to respect one another and to live in harmony. I'm sure NM and SK makes money from what they are doing otherwise they would not be in existance, I also as a rental shop owner make some money that is why we are all in business or why we work and my staff get paid for their work so they are making money.
The distributors has the right to distribute - they have paid millions to the studios for that right. So maybe we should lay the blame at the studios for charging license and distribution fees. After ll it is them wh determens when we can watch the movies in S.A.. Or maybe we should lay the blame on the people that actually manufacture the DVD's surely they make money from it? But maybe we should then blame the producers and directors for getting paid for making movies And what about the writers? And then blame it on the actors for getting paid millions for performing in a movie... and everyone else who is involved with making a movie so that we can be entertained by escaping while watching a movie for an hour or two. Surely the person that "manufactures" and funds the "product" has the right to distribute as they want and to recoup the cost of producing the product and maybe make some money off it?
So if we get rid of the distributors, studios and the writers and producers and directors and actors and everyone from the caterers to the stunt men that earns a living from entertaining us we will all be staring at a blank screen. No, sorry we will be staring at adverts on TV the whole night...