Jacob Zuma joins Twitter

Its very obviously a PR campaign...

The footage and language of the tweets is clearly professional.

Sorry, I was stating the obvious there. It's the warm reception I find troubling, although unsurprising, and in a very small and manipulatable ecosystem.
 
We are more manipulated by ongoing mass media assault on Zuma than this one twit.
Having said that, Zuma is an authentic leader. No other ANC leader could achieve it. It is why he is considered a treat by those who still do not understand menthality of black population.
 
We are more manipulated by ongoing mass media assault on Zuma than this one twit.
Having said that, Zuma is an authentic leader. No other ANC leader could achieve it. It is why he is considered a treat by those who still do not understand menthality of black population.
Wahahaha haha.....

*breathes*

Wahahaha haha....
 
We are more manipulated by ongoing mass media assault on Zuma than this one twit.
Having said that, Zuma is an authentic leader. No other ANC leader could achieve it. It is why he is considered a treat by those who still do not understand menthality of black population.

So, you sayin we differ after all?
 
You don't give a reason, so my comment stands.

I don't say you are posting nonsense even when you do. Try to say why you think I am posting nonsense, be specific... do it better. Otherwise I say again, you are a trolling robot.

WTF??
 
We are more manipulated by ongoing mass media assault on Zuma than this one twit.
Having said that, Zuma is an authentic leader. No other ANC leader could achieve it. It is why he is considered a treat by those who still do not understand menthality of black population.

WTF??

LOL
 
Well the ANC is nominating him for parliament again...
So now you are posting nonsense. Not joining Jews in parliament. Only for SA citizens. sajunky is an alien for them.
 
Last edited:
We are more manipulated by ongoing mass media assault on Zuma than this one twit.
Having said that, Zuma is an authentic leader. No other ANC leader could achieve it. It is why he is considered a treat by those who still do not understand menthality of black population.
he is a king, he ain't a leader as a leader leads by example, something he is incapable of. The example he set is such corruption that the SOE employees have become mostly cadres who will make those institutions bankrupt.

He understand the mentality that people will give loyalty for jobs irrespective if they have any skills. He also is playing to people's communism mentality, something that yes other leaders before him never understood.
 
he is a king, he ain't a leader as a leader leads by example, something he is incapable of. The example he set is such corruption that the SOE employees have become mostly cadres who will make those institutions bankrupt.

He understand the mentality that people will give loyalty for jobs irrespective if they have any skills. He also is playing to people's communism mentality, something that yes other leaders before him never understood.
Lot of assumptions based on western mentality (BTW, very recently imposed on us, it wasn't like that in the past) implying that the same rule of law should apply to a king itself.

There are also lot of insconsistencies in your post I have to deal with:

As for corruption, charges are only related to the one event "Arms Deal". This Arms Deal was made only for one purpose: to make ANC leaders fully dependent and to serve as puppets in hands of those who pushed for transformation in 1993. I don't believe that Zuma is corrupt, but all others who participated in this deal and became shortly mining magnats or bilioneers are clean. All are corrupt, but Zuma decided to cut his puppet-ties, it is how Zuma became a bad person and corrupt.

Zuma is a first non-puppet true black leader and he became a president, despite of accusations by mass media for raping a well known hooker, taking a shower and a corruption. As a leader he survived poisoning and dozen of no-confidence motions, but Eskom started receiving a quality coal to help keeping our lights on.

During his years of presidency Zuma didn't show any communists tendencies. He brought to South Africa foreign investors from Russia, China and India to give some competition to the Openheimers family monopoly. It was good for the country, but it is why Zuma is very bad. He almost completed his work on a new Mining Charter and mining magnats were not happy with. I heard on Jewish radio lot of comments criticising new Mining Charter, it seems it was a main reason for removing Zuma. He initiated a procedure to force banks for paying outstanding government loans and to fine banks involved with sabotaging Rand value. Remember these stories? Bankers and Openheimers were so desperate in removing Zuma that they initiated landgrab campain by a Malema, ANC was encouraged to follow. It was the only successful path for removing Zuma from the office.

Now, when Zuma is out, a typical communist landgrab is on the agenda. Anglo American is coming as an advisary to help us to determine that Anglo American and De Beers property to be excluded. .LOL.

Landgrab wasn't initiated by Zuma, but those who tried to avert people attention from a new Mining Charter. Now country stability is in serious danger. A new president is doing everything to destroy ANC. I am sure you will remember who made it for you when it happen. Happy New Year, it will show, inevitable.
 
Wow... Whole wall of bollocks... Didn't think it was possible to be that ignorant of reality.
 
Lot of assumptions based on western mentality (BTW, very recently imposed on us, it wasn't like that in the past) implying that the same rule of law should apply to a king itself.

There are also lot of insconsistencies in your post I have to deal with:

As for corruption, charges are only related to the one event "Arms Deal". This Arms Deal was made only for one purpose: to make ANC leaders fully dependent and to serve as puppets in hands of those who pushed for transformation in 1993. I don't believe that Zuma is corrupt, but all others who participated in this deal and became shortly mining magnats or bilioneers are clean. All are corrupt, but Zuma decided to cut his puppet-ties, it is how Zuma became a bad person and corrupt.

Zuma is a first non-puppet true black leader and he became a president, despite of accusations by mass media for raping a well known hooker, taking a shower and a corruption. As a leader he survived poisoning and dozen of no-confidence motions, but Eskom started receiving a quality coal to help keeping our lights on.

During his years of presidency Zuma didn't show any communists tendencies. He brought to South Africa foreign investors from Russia, China and India to give some competition to the Openheimers family monopoly. It was good for the country, but it is why Zuma is very bad. He almost completed his work on a new Mining Charter and mining magnats were not happy with. I heard on Jewish radio lot of comments criticising new Mining Charter, it seems it was a main reason for removing Zuma. He initiated a procedure to force banks for paying outstanding government loans and to fine banks involved with sabotaging Rand value. Remember these stories? Bankers and Openheimers were so desperate in removing Zuma that they initiated landgrab campain by a Malema, ANC was encouraged to follow. It was the only successful path for removing Zuma from the office.

Now, when Zuma is out, a typical communist landgrab is on the agenda. Anglo American is coming as an advisary to help us to determine that Anglo American and De Beers property to be excluded. .LOL.

Landgrab wasn't initiated by Zuma, but those who tried to avert people attention from a new Mining Charter. Now country stability is in serious danger. A new president is doing everything to destroy ANC. I am sure you will remember who made it for you when it happen. Happy New Year, it will show, inevitable.

"All are corrupt, but Zuma decided to cut his puppet-ties, it is how Zuma became a bad person and corrupt." This is a laughable statement. By claiming everyone else is corrupt except Zuma. Nkandla, his son and the Guptas accumelating so much wealth in a short time, Shabir SHaik was found in a court of law to be in a general corrupt relationship with Zuma. If Zuma was not corrupt then why did the state capture inquiry found such overwhelming evidence Where are Zuma allies the Guptas? Will they ever return to South Africa willingly.

The SOEs are going backward by deployments loyal to Zuma. This is at all levels in those organisation. Hiring based on not Affirmative Action but on loyalty. Under Zuma's presidency he hired people who are not qualified for those positions. Look at all the heads of SOEs that were hired. The weekend special etc. If there was legislation that the most competent and qualified black person be hired it would be ignored. The western concept of Affirmative Action in government has been replaced with loyalism and cronyism.

I don't care much of the Mining Charter. Is it's going to put wealth in the hands of blacks from whites? A few very rich will benefit, not black people. Big money companies have lobbyists to pay kick backs so irrespective of some new mining charter that find away around the rules.This is no benefit to the average man on the street. The corrupt deals we saw where Zuma's family was involved where the mines were stripped of all its assets and sold of. People lost their jobs. Just blatant corrupt. Rich benefit, poor mine workers lose out.
South Africa's gold mining has declined steadily to a point the biggest issue as a result in my view is what to do with all the ex-mine workers who are now without a job.
Coal supply is a problem as we all need competent people in charge of Eskom who plan ahead. Same with water. We don't want a situation that all monies are paid on salaries and consultants and infrastructure is falling apart leading to massive bailouts due to the cost being so expensive as loyalist companies need to make huge profits and act as an additional middleman companies and using additional consultant companies hiking up prices to absurd levels.
The Zupta coal supply to Eskom is money laundering that happened without legislation. Were the Guptas BEE qualifications checked for this? And no your statement that quality coal was not supplied is not true.

Regarding your statement "As for corruption, charges are only related to the one event "Arms Deal"." The reason no other corruption charges are laid is because of him only hired loyalists including the NPA which would mean if one gets found guilty everyone in government will be found guilty i.e. the whole government being corrupt. To now claim he was never charged means he was innocent is absurd, considering the situation became so toxic and obvious that a state capture inquiry had to be launched and you cannot ignore everything that points to corruption on such a massive scale and that is just the few that was willing to speak out.

With communism I am not referring to land grab, I am referring to those at the top pushing a communist agenda to distract from their looting. They can always say increase in unemployment, bad economy, SOE failing is because of the pains in transitioning caused by apartheid i.e. they have an excuse.The famous white monopoly campaign and the ANC reached such absurd levels that it was found the Guptas paid Bell Pottinger a huge amount of money to spread it. To continue his fake campaign making Zuma is a noble figure is absurd. His motivation was state capture and loyalty and strengthening his faction.
 
Last edited:
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X