People like that have so been indoctrinated it becomes part of their identity. It's sad.
-
Join the MyBroadband community
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
-
Question of the Day: Main reasons you wouldn't get an EV?
Jacob Zuma joins Twitter
- Thread starter Jamie McKane
- Start date
-
- Tags
- jacob zuma
ToxicBunny
Oi! Leave me out of this...
Nah... This is beyond indoctrination really...
You are traversing the matter. You know well who else in ANC top is corrupt in addition to Zuma. All become puppets in 1993. All are good, untouchable, even they become mining magnats or billioneers.
As a good things he fired a fully qualified bank mole, Marcus, who worked for destroing currency in the long term.
A racist. It is for people, no matter of race. According to ANC principles.
Yes, it treated current monopoly to such level, so they resqued by creating a diversion. You didn't like Zuma? Now you have a landgrab and Anglo American will play as an advisory to preserve their property.
A coal is a perfect example of Openheimers monopoly. The coal scam was running for number of years and nobody was asking for a proper procurement process, as it didn't exist. It became a problem with Guptas. After removing Zuma coal supplies were reversed in a matter of 2 weeks. You must be a fool if you think that Ramaphosa followed a proper procurement process in such short time.
You are completely wrong. Arms Deal related charges were already dozen years old before Zuma came to power. It is why I would expect much more fraud cases if Zuma were corrupt indeed.
How can you overlook what came from the the state capture enquiry? Go read the testimonies carefully. If you ignore that and selectively choose some rich international companies as being representative of whites control government you are disillusion.You are traversing the matter. You know well who else in ANC top is corrupt in addition to Zuma. All become puppets in 1993. All are good, untouchable, even they become mining magnats or billioneers.
As a good things he fired a fully qualified bank mole, Marcus, who worked for destroing currency in the long term.
A racist. It is for people, no matter of race. According to ANC principles.
Yes, it treated current monopoly to such level, so they resqued by creating a diversion. You didn't like Zuma? Now you have a landgrab and Anglo American will play as an advisory to preserve their property.
A coal is a perfect example of Openheimers monopoly. The coal scam was running for number of years and nobody was asking for a proper procurement process, as it didn't exist. It became a problem with Guptas. After removing Zuma coal supplies were reversed in a matter of 2 weeks. You must be a fool if you think that Ramaphosa followed a proper procurement process in such short time.
You are completely wrong. Arms Deal related charges were already dozen years old before Zuma came to power. It is why I would expect much more fraud cases if Zuma were corrupt indeed.
One could argue that overtime all hierarchies of power become corrupt. Zuma took that further and quicker and to a larger scale and with such greater profit margins and middleman companies than anyone else. You can argue what about this or what about that. As president your actions should be above reproach since you made an oath to uphold the constitution.
He broke his oath. Period. The president's oath is sacrosanct. You don't break it and no one can justify the numerous ways he broke it mean he was ignorant of breaking it.
He let the Guptas make government and SOEs appointments from Saxonworld.
Under him the State Owned Enterprises have become morally and financially bankrupt with his and Gupta deployment of people not having skills but who are loyal, corrupt and Gupta lackeys.
You try to generalize the existence of the Openheimers or Rupert or whoever as proof of unfair enrichment similar to which the Zupta campaign white monopoly capital was used to portray the average white person as someone who has a pot of gold. Mentioning a few edge cases of super rich trying to put all white people into that group is mischievous. You can't portray something you read superficially that Gupta coal is the most superior coal and cheaper. Leave it to auditors who investigated Eskom and make those assertions on what the profit margins are, what tax evasion was used and how money was channeled out through complicated schemes. Guptas for years had a very aggressive disinformation campaign that they created their own newspaper, news channel, teaming up with BLF and Bell Pottinger,making government and SOE appointments from Saxonworld and getting majority of government advertising spend for that purpose despite not having any readership or viewership. You obviously fell for this campaign as trying to make you see reason is pointless as you debate like a Gupta funded lackey.
Last edited:
Well, because there is no prospects for successful prosecuting Zuma on new charges (other than very old - circa 1995 - and politically motivated from the Arms Deal), you will be prosecuting our president on breaking the oath. It will be the the first case in the history, so you will be creating new procedure that suit your will. Interesting...
No. Zuma didn't take an oath to support Openheimers monopoly.
ToxicBunny
Oi! Leave me out of this...
Say what... You are aware there are many avenues to prosecute that theiving money hungry twat and the sooner he rots in jail the better for the whole country.
De Beers was founded in 1888 Apartheid was introduced in 1948!
Openheimers get audited. It's transparent for how many years. Is auditing a Western concept not suitable for South Africa?
How many ANC government departments get clean audits? How many billions are unaccounted for. Not to mention the KPMG Gupta influence that caused them to lose so many clients.
First in history. Hahaha. New procedure that suits my will. Hahahaha. Is this some religious reference or are you just making it up. Your statements are getting more absurd with every post
It already happened, no need for a new procedure. He already was found guilty of violating the constitution which was in his oath which he said he will uphold the constitution and was ordered to pay back some of the Nkandla monies. Even then he didn't pay and used a shady loan from that shady bank VBS that collapsed.
Hehehehehe
He isn't being charged for other charges because of his control of the NPA, influence in the ANC, intelligence on enemies, his Zuma faction still in government and Ramaphosa trying to keep peace & protecting the image of the ANC. If another party was in charge his son and the Guptas would be in prison already. Zuma probably would use some health reasons and drag out with court cases any charges being brought against him like he has been doing. NPA dropped charges with a Zuma lackey in charge and Zuma is using that fast to further drag out he process saying the fairness of it has been compromised. NPA has such a huge backlog intentionally created under Zuma to further protect him and his corrupt friends, so he and his supporters can use the defense of not being charged as meaning he is innocent.
The State capture inquiry is still ongoing. You can't say he will never be charged if the inquiry is still ongoing. Have you read the transcripts of this inquiry so far? It is shocking.When they make a finding do you honestly think they will say Zuma is innocent in the whole matter? Please take your blinkers off and stop making such absurd statements like you have been doing.
Last edited:
I responded to the same nonsence already. Before Zuma became a president, so he could control NPA, these Arms Deal charges were allready very old and there were no other charges - absolutely nothing. Only charges from the Arms Deal. These charges were brought out for a one purpose: to prevent Zuma to became a president. Why they didn't have anything more current? It was lot of time to do that.
After all these failed attempts to remove Zuma and even poison him, they brought out a landgrab programme, as they didn't see any other way to unseat Zuma. It was a risk to introduce a decade of instability. Such desperate move make me convinced that Zuma is innocent. Not a puppet, it is why in mass media he is a bad person, a showerhead raping a well known hooker, etc.
