sorry to butt in, and i am no fan of Paul Kruger or afrikaans culture, but i don't see how removing a statue and replacing it with a statue from ANOTHER culture is helping either. the statue obviously means a lot to some people as it is part of their heritage, and the fact that the ANCYL wants it knocked over acknowledges that they know it matters to some people or they wouldn't see it as a "threat". the thing is, we cant' take anything the ANCYL says seriously, as it has an idiot of a leader, and secondly it wants to shut twitter down. an organisation with this mentality can't be making decisions about what statues to erect and knock down.
i'm all for erecting monuments if people feel the need, but why demolish something just to put something new in it's place? why is Paul Kruger so threatening?