LIVE | Apartheid flag judgment

Nothing better than a good circle jerk from homophobes. Do you use your left or right hand?
 
Oh and we wont be allowed to fly an unappealing flag anymore? Wow. That seems like harsh punishment.
 
Snowflakes will look for any excuse to blame their useless on. The current excuse is the old flag. Most of the moaners and "activists' were not even born yet. Just look around.
 
It looks a darker shade of orange to me. I guess I was wrong.
Actually not rare. Many people have a degree of colour blindness. Much is not total, but trather a case of discerning colours differently. You will probably fail the Ishihara tests. If it ever affects you in a job application etc - remember that term. Been there, dunnit. Nearly lost a bursary when I was young. Luckily I insisted I could see and differentiate colours. A few tests later all was sorted - I was not going to inadvertantly blow up the world by going into engineering ;)
 
Snowflakes will look for any excuse to blame their useless on. The current excuse is the old flag. Most of the moaners and "activists' were not even born yet. Just look around.

It's funny how people who never owned the flag, used the flag in public or made a living off the flag are so emotionally torn up about this.
 
Question for the PC woke: Are we going to ban the current flag as well, considering ti contains elements of the Zulu headdress and the Zulus were responsible for the biggest slaughter in known South African history (Mfecane). Or not because the Zulus are not a minority group - it's only an anti-white thing?

Juliarse has already shown the thin side of the wedge. For this reason I will be getting an old South African flag, the N-2 version.

Looking for an old old South African flag (N-2 version) - 1928–1982 version since the old (N-1) is now undesirable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Swa
1. The flag must never be allowed to touch the ground or the floor.
2. Tables, podiums, railings or platforms should never be draped with the flag.
3. The flag should never be used as underclothes, bath mats or any derogatory application.
4. The flag should never be used for any commercial advertising in a manner that is disrespectful to the flag.
5. Use of the National flag in artefacts or manufactured products is subject to the sanction of the presidency and the Department of Trade and Industry.
6. The flag should always be hoisted at the start of the working day and lowered again before or at sunset.
7. The flag should be hoisted briskly and lowered ceremoniously.
8. The flag should never be used to start or finish any competition, race or similar event.

Seems I've finally found some uses for the rainbow flag.
 
I have zero attachment to a flag, it's not about the flag but the erosion of liberties.
I am of the opinion that those liberties you believe is eroding is gone already. The constitution that was supposed to protect everybody's rights was interpreted like by the concourt as this: https://www.politicsweb.co.za/opinion/concourt-afrikaner-culture-belongs-in-the-dustbin-

So instead of most of us being allowed to be adults and do our best not to offend each other, we get a nanny state that tells us how to think and behave.
 
I have zero attachment to a flag, it's not about the flag but the erosion of liberties.

In the context of his post I made that point. I again reiterate that I am not for the flag being banned, I am just not deeply impacted by it
 
I am of the opinion that those liberties you believe is eroding is gone already. The constitution that was supposed to protect everybody's rights was interpreted like by the concourt as this: https://www.politicsweb.co.za/opinion/concourt-afrikaner-culture-belongs-in-the-dustbin-

So instead of most of us being allowed to be adults and do our best not to offend each other, we get a nanny state that tells us how to think and behave.
Though old enough to become a meme aimed at the USA ...

704079
 
In the context of his post I made that point. I again reiterate that I am not for the flag being banned, I am just not deeply impacted by it

It's not about you but the greater principal. Even if you hate something with every fibre of your being you should defend the right for someone to exercise those rights.

First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out...
 
In the context of his post I made that point. I again reiterate that I am not for the flag being banned, I am just not deeply impacted by it
It's this part I have a problem with. In the end you are impacted by it the same way those Zimbobweans who aren't allowed to protest any more are.

Why do you think it's gaining international traction? It's because socialist states already saw this happening before.
 
Cyril Ramaphosa and the story of the frogs in the water

In recently published memoirs, one of Cyril Ramaphosa's main opponents pays generous tribute to his character and negotiating skills during the talks leading up to the new South African constitution and the election in 1994.

Dr Mario Oriani-Ambrosini, who died in 2014, was a constitutional lawyer who became an MP. He was also a key adviser to Prince Mangosuthu Buthelezi both during the negotiations and afterwards when the latter was minister of home affairs in the governments of national unity. His memoirs – the Prince and I: A South African Institutional Odyssey – are published this year by his estate.

According to the memoirs, Mr Ramaphosa, "stood head and shoulders above his colleagues" in the African National Congress (ANC) as well as above the National Party's negotiators. He was a "born leader" and a "straight shooter". Nor did he ever lie or "misrepresent anything".

What then are we to make of this paragraph in Dr Oriani-Ambrosini's intriguing memoirs?

"In his brutal honesty, Ramaphosa told me of the ANC's 25-year strategy to deal with the whites: it would be like boiling a frog alive, which is done by raising the temperature very slowly. Being cold-blooded, the frog does not notice the slow temperature increase, but if the temperature is raised suddenly, the frog will jump out of the water. He meant that the black majority would pass laws transferring wealth, land, and economic power from white to black slowly and incrementally, until the whites lost all they had gained in South Africa, but without taking too much from them at any given time to cause them to rebel or fight."


Funny how exactly 25 years afterwards the ANC's real plan is now more than apparent.
 
It's this part I have a problem with. In the end you are impacted by it the same way those Zimbobweans who aren't allowed to protest any more are.

Why do you think it's gaining international traction? It's because socialist states already saw this happening before.

Cyril Ramaphosa and the story of the frogs in the water

In recently published memoirs, one of Cyril Ramaphosa's main opponents pays generous tribute to his character and negotiating skills during the talks leading up to the new South African constitution and the election in 1994.

Dr Mario Oriani-Ambrosini, who died in 2014, was a constitutional lawyer who became an MP. He was also a key adviser to Prince Mangosuthu Buthelezi both during the negotiations and afterwards when the latter was minister of home affairs in the governments of national unity. His memoirs – the Prince and I: A South African Institutional Odyssey – are published this year by his estate.

According to the memoirs, Mr Ramaphosa, "stood head and shoulders above his colleagues" in the African National Congress (ANC) as well as above the National Party's negotiators. He was a "born leader" and a "straight shooter". Nor did he ever lie or "misrepresent anything".

What then are we to make of this paragraph in Dr Oriani-Ambrosini's intriguing memoirs?

"In his brutal honesty, Ramaphosa told me of the ANC's 25-year strategy to deal with the whites: it would be like boiling a frog alive, which is done by raising the temperature very slowly. Being cold-blooded, the frog does not notice the slow temperature increase, but if the temperature is raised suddenly, the frog will jump out of the water. He meant that the black majority would pass laws transferring wealth, land, and economic power from white to black slowly and incrementally, until the whites lost all they had gained in South Africa, but without taking too much from them at any given time to cause them to rebel or fight."


Funny how exactly 25 years afterwards the ANC's real plan is now more than apparent.

Not that doubt the ANC is up made up of scummy people, I just find it odd that it is the fist time we hear about it, is from a dead person? Is there a memo or another witness to this? hasn't afriforum asked Ramaphosa to address this?
 
Is there no white people here who hates the old flag?
Nobody hating the old government for selling us out?
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X