kaspaas
Expert Member
Hi,
there is very little data available in an organised fashion to Jo Soap.
I tried to make sense of the current Power Shortage with a few assumptions and produced the table below:
Year Demand Reduce Capacity Gap
2008 100 -1 97 3
2009 102 -2 93 7
2010 104 -3 90 10
2011 106 -4 87 13
2012 108 -5 84 16
2013 110 -6 81 19
Year: It is obvious what this is
Demand: Current demand is 100%, growing at 2% a year compounded
Reduce: Capacity reduction every year because of increase equipment failure due to over utilisation
Capacity: The capacity of Eskom to deliver - at present it is taken as 97 % - 3 hours blackout in 60 hours peek per week is 3%.
The gap is the shortage between what is required and what could be delivered.
The short and sweet: By 2012 you should expect at least 5 x more dark hours than at present.
In general, the assumptions should favour Eskom. It is doubtful if peak demand will grow by only 2%, and if capacity will decline by only 1% per year.
Obviously, the assumptions and method used is open for discussion - it is crude, but it does highlight how bad the future is going to be.
there is very little data available in an organised fashion to Jo Soap.
I tried to make sense of the current Power Shortage with a few assumptions and produced the table below:
Year Demand Reduce Capacity Gap
2008 100 -1 97 3
2009 102 -2 93 7
2010 104 -3 90 10
2011 106 -4 87 13
2012 108 -5 84 16
2013 110 -6 81 19
Year: It is obvious what this is
Demand: Current demand is 100%, growing at 2% a year compounded
Reduce: Capacity reduction every year because of increase equipment failure due to over utilisation
Capacity: The capacity of Eskom to deliver - at present it is taken as 97 % - 3 hours blackout in 60 hours peek per week is 3%.
The gap is the shortage between what is required and what could be delivered.
The short and sweet: By 2012 you should expect at least 5 x more dark hours than at present.
In general, the assumptions should favour Eskom. It is doubtful if peak demand will grow by only 2%, and if capacity will decline by only 1% per year.
Obviously, the assumptions and method used is open for discussion - it is crude, but it does highlight how bad the future is going to be.