Manual vs Automatic

Morris Minor 1957 model, 2nd hand. Did a total of 350 000 miles in that car.
VW Beetle also 2nd hand --- did 250 000 km in that one.
VW Kombi --- 150 000 km sold it because I got a company car.
VW 16 valve Jetta -- finished off at 600 000 km -- passed the test of being my car, then the wife's then two daughters did their best to destroy it unsuccessfully.
Ford Telstar -- the worst but still ended up at 160 000 Km -- written off in a freak accident in the Karroo.
Please keep your stories straight.
 
My personal milage versus the total mileage.

the point is clutch changes in manuals are very rare IF the vehicle is looked after.
So much for being on the ignore list.

Clearly we have very different definitions for "Total". And "finishing off" at a certain milage. Strange how you used much lower milage in the "most reliable car ever" thread. Seems to be the place to mention the big numbers. Remarkable how the jetta was "finished off" at 600 thousand and then miraculously raised itself from the dead for another 170 thousand or so. Lol. In just 2 years. Lol. But you wouldn't mention that in the "most reliable cars thread". No siree. No one there is interested in how reliable cars are. Just how far you drove them personally. In addition to your other ones.:ROFL:

Maybe communicating more clearly will save you from having to explain and backtrack the whole time here? I can see why you don't know anything about 'modern fancy bmws' if your experience is limited to 1950s designs. But it is still delusional to think you can 'pull away from just about anything in 5th gear' in an old bakkie. You need to alert people if you are racing them. Some people are just trying to drive in peace. Sorry.
 
Last edited:
The point is clutch changes in manuals are very rare IF the vehicle is looked after.

Wow. Great point. I really thought it was a consumable that you kinda had to change all the time. This changes everything.

Judging by the distances that you claim ;);) and the clutch life you claim, you can't really be changing gears all that often. Yet another reason to laugh off your uninformed opinions.
 
Last edited:
Are you rejecting the idea that clutches are pretty reliable? Okay then.

In the most reliable thread as I interpreted the meaning, what could one vouch for yourself, hence the numbers quoted there.

No, all you are trying to do is justify your personal attacks just because someone has an opinion about automatics and in particular the drivers of certain automatics

Maybe I should start attacking you for your personal attacks on drivers of "vitos" You seems to have the view that they are the scum of the earth and have no place on our roads either.
Oh of course, the only ones entitled to use the roads are aggressive BMW automatic drivers. The rest of the driving population must simply not be anywhere in sight.

Of I know, you are a blue light brigade driver! Hence why you have this attitude.

Are by any chance the driver of that BMW? is that why you are so upset?

Are you denying that it is possible for any auto vehicle to not downshift in some circumstances? If so, then explain why automatics can be "downshifted" by a driver?
Surely such a facility will be completely unnecessary if the vehicle will always select the best gear ratio in all circumstances.
Are you saying that an automatic will always select the most appropriate gear in all circumstances and won't "hunt" - I don't know the correct term to use -- between two gears? Certainly, most if not all manual drivers will attest to cases where they could not decide which gear was more appropriate.

Or that a 6-speed manual 4 x 4 with sufficient power will not be able to maintain speed up a hill at 3 000 to 3 400 revs if in the correct gear? And cruise at 1 500 to 2 000 revs in 6th gear on the level?
 
Last edited:
Are you denying that it is possible for any auto vehicle to not downshift in some circumstances? If so, then explain why automatics can be "downshifted" by a driver?
Surely such a facility will be completely unnecessary if the vehicle will always select the best gear ratio in all circumstances.
Are you saying that an automatic will always select the most appropriate gear in all circumstances and won't "hunt" - I don't know the correct term to use -- between two gears? Certainly, most if not all manual drivers will attest to cases where they could not decide which gear was more appropriate.
It's been stated quite clearly that autos can downshift, gosh. As for why many autos allow the driver to do their own thing, the marketing people know that sometimes some people want to go manual, that's it really. Now please listen very carefully to this next part - a well designed auto will never hunt for gears. Clever engineers have done all the work they needed to make sure of that in order to provide a good drive and also protect the engine.
But if you'd rather choose to believe that it is somehow possible for humans to select the right great 99.9% of the time based on feels and sound of the car, but impossible for those same humans to design an auto to do the same while having direct access to many more sensors with accurate information, go right ahead. Because that's what your argument is boiling down to now and it's getting rather silly.
 
Also... :ROFL:
duty_calls.png
 
Are you rejecting the idea that clutches are pretty reliable? Okay then.

No, can you even read? Where on earth did you get that? Are you off your meds? Not your first language?

"I am looking pretty crazy here. Let me make up something I can actually argue! So I can get away from all the clueless things I said! That will make me look better!". No. It makes you look worse.

And yes, it is an attack on vivos. And people who put their family in commercial vehicles bakkies. And losers who play stupid games on public roads because they feel insecure and jealous. Shame, that guy probably just wanted to go home to his family. And we all know how 'you can accelerate away from just about anything in 5th gear in your bakkie'. As long as the other guy isn't aware that you are racing. These drivers are a menace to society.

Imagine an aged boy racer revving his bakkie at BMWs. We all know that with competence, a bakkie is soooo much faster up hills. Jealousy? Insecurity?
 
Last edited:
No, can you even read? Where on earth did you get that? Are you off your meds? Not your first language?

"I am looking pretty crazy here. Let me make up something I can actually argue! So I can get away from all the clueless things I said! That will make me look better!". No. It makes you look worse.

And yes, it is an attack on vivos. And people who put their family in commercial vehicles bakkies. And losers who play stupid games on public roads because they feel insecure and jealous. Shame, that guy probably just wanted to go home to his family. And we all know how 'you can accelerate away from just about anything in 5th gear in your bakkie'. As long as the other guy isn't aware that you are racing. These drivers are a menace to society.

Imagine an aged boy racer revving his bakkie at BMWs. We all know that with competence, a bakkie is soooo much faster up hills. Jealousy? Insecurity?
One more time. I was not racing anyone. I was simply riding along minding my own business. I don't need to prove anything to anyone.
 
It's been stated quite clearly that autos can downshift, gosh. As for why many autos allow the driver to do their own thing, the marketing people know that sometimes some people want to go manual, that's it really. Now please listen very carefully to this next part - a well designed auto will never hunt for gears. Clever engineers have done all the work they needed to make sure of that in order to provide a good drive and also protect the engine.
But if you'd rather choose to believe that it is somehow possible for humans to select the right great 99.9% of the time based on feels and sound of the car, but impossible for those same humans to design an auto to do the same while having direct access to many more sensors with accurate information, go right ahead. Because that's what your argument is boiling down to now and it's getting rather silly.
Okay I get it. Well designed auto boxes never hunt between gears.
There are no circumstances that can arise where this will happen ever. The driver has no influence over the process.
He/she will never apply too little pressure on the gas pedal for that to happen.
 
Are you rejecting the idea that clutches are pretty reliable? Okay then.

In the most reliable thread as I interpreted the meaning, what could one vouch for yourself, hence the numbers quoted there.

No, all you are trying to do is justify your personal attacks just because someone has an opinion about automatics and in particular the drivers of certain automatics

Maybe I should start attacking you for your personal attacks on drivers of "vitos" You seems to have the view that they are the scum of the earth and have no place on our roads either.
Oh of course, the only ones entitled to use the roads are aggressive BMW automatic drivers. The rest of the driving population must simply not be anywhere in sight.

Of I know, you are a blue light brigade driver! Hence why you have this attitude.

Are by any chance the driver of that BMW? is that why you are so upset?

Are you denying that it is possible for any auto vehicle to not downshift in some circumstances? If so, then explain why automatics can be "downshifted" by a driver?
Surely such a facility will be completely unnecessary if the vehicle will always select the best gear ratio in all circumstances.
Are you saying that an automatic will always select the most appropriate gear in all circumstances and won't "hunt" - I don't know the correct term to use -- between two gears? Certainly, most if not all manual drivers will attest to cases where they could not decide which gear was more appropriate.

Or that a 6-speed manual 4 x 4 with sufficient power will not be able to maintain speed up a hill at 3 000 to 3 400 revs if in the correct gear? And cruise at 1 500 to 2 000 revs in 6th gear on the level?

Since you love finding links to support your view.




Can we agree that they are consumable items that on average rarely go beyond 150,000km, regardless of your magical mileage.

I’m betting ALL the clutches in your unicorn cars were hell and gone, but because it still moves forwards and changed gear you deemed it just fine....because #MANUAL4LIFE.

Also you are arguing a logical fallacy with the downshift nonsense. The cars are by default setup to be most economical and maintain a speed.

Having the ability to downshift doesn’t mean their maintained gear is wrong or incorrect, it simply give the driver the control (that you claim is lacking from an auto) to override the economical first approach and push the most power instead to INCREASE speed and progress further faster at the expense of more fuel.

The car will always be in the correct gear to progress forward at the current speed comfortably, of if an increase in speed is demand doing so most economically.

The driver has the option to manually override this if they so choose.

As for the hunting of gears it’s simply a case of bad ratios implemented on the wrong cars. The exact thing happens to manuals when they mate the same box to many variants of engines, it’s not the gearbox type at fault it’s simply manufacturer cutting corners.
 
Last edited:
My point has always been about the availability of "cheap automatics" coupled with poor driver training.
The DCT box is as with many of the other "automatics" a sophisticated piece of machinery that needs very specific training on how to use properly!

Your comment on how to drive one:
For that to work with a driver under training would mean:
1. He/she is familiar with a normal auto box using a torque convertor
2. Familiar that a proper auto can "crawl" in traffic.
3. Wait for space to clear up ahead.-- Sure that will work in this country what with all you guys in your autos to get upset.
4. Release the brake fully etc etc. --- hmmm sure, next time you go car hunting see if this is what the salesman tells you.
5. Use light throttle to move ahead with a pack of baying hounds in their BMWs cursing you at the back, especially in the fast lane.

That will work very well on the longest parking garage in SA -----

6. Oh, they have to RTFM!!! Who does that these days?? Not you wet behind the ears lot that is for sure. That is the prerogative of us old-timers who have a healthy respect for machinery of all kinds.

I managed to do it perfectly fine for the 3+ years and 50k km's I owned a Golf with a DSG and there is no reason why anyone else shouldn't be able to do the same. What you describe is simply drivers being impatient, ill informed, lacking mechanical knowledge and sympathy, etc. This is essentially the crux of many driving/vehicle related issues in South Africa and elsewhere in the world where humans have become less and less responsible for their own experience.

So, here is your chance oh mighty authority on automatic gearboxes - give us a better non-horribly wrong definition of a DCT gearbox. I am waiting ------

You are starting to sound like a broken record, when called out or shown to be wrong or provided a different view point to yours, you lash out with the same lame rhetoric. A simple Google provides some basic definitions of a DCT gearbox...

 
Okay I get it. Well designed auto boxes never hunt between gears.
There are no circumstances that can arise where this will happen ever. The driver has no influence over the process.
He/she will never apply too little pressure on the gas pedal for that to happen.

Correct.

I’ll add a well designed automatic matched correctly to the car and engine.

My DSG never hunted for anything.

The only oddity ever experienced was trying to basically rally drive a sporty car up a grassy hill and the gearbox/clutch not being sure what the hell to do and spinning.

Easily resolved by taking all feet off all peddles and letting it climb itself up the hill calmly.
 
@Neuk:

Here is a cut n paste out of an article written by someone talking about one or another VW DCT vehicle from a site that specialises in car topics:

Hmmm. Clearly, that author did not go to the @Neuk School of advanced driving!

So what now? Why are DCT boxes burning out their clutches??? Is it the el-cheapo DCT box or driver training or a combination of both?
Or, maybe it is simply the fact that DCT boxes are not really suitable for use on busy highways in urban areas? Yes??? No??? Maybe Hmmm :unsure: :unsure: :whistling:;)

In my experience, premature clutch wear or burnout in DCT gearboxes is from driver misuse.
 
Heh? I put 200,000km on a DSG much of it in heavy traffic and never did any of the above as it's simply not necessary.

The clutch engages fully when the brake is released and then you don't need any throttle to move forward as there is enough torque from idle to do so, not slipping of clutch required.

Inversely when the brake is pressed and the car comes to a complete halt the clutch is disengaged, which is why on cars without Hillstart assist it rolls back ever so slightly like any manual would if you let it go....hence you use the handbrake like you would in a manual car unless you have hillstart that is.

The bolded part is the kicker, most who 'creep' while driving DSG's don't fully release the brake which effectively drags the clutches, similar to slipping a clutch in a manual gearbox.
 
In my experience, premature clutch wear or burnout in DCT gearboxes is from driver misuse.
The bolded part is the kicker, most who 'creep' while driving DSG's don't fully release the brake which effectively drags the clutches, similar to slipping a clutch in a manual gearbox.


Correct. having spent a combined 6 years in bumper to bumper traffic in DSG cars. It takes a very specific technique not to ride the clutch. still better than manual :)
 
The bolded part is the kicker, most who 'creep' while driving DSG's don't fully release the brake which effectively drags the clutches, similar to slipping a clutch in a manual gearbox.

Yeah it’s a weird thing to put my head around as I could never possibly drive like that, regardless of which kind of automatic.

But does make sense.

So to me it’s not a specific technique as per your post above, just normal operation of driving an automatic vehicle.
 
This clown thinks auto cars are a menace because of incompetent drivers and poor driver training- despite them need LESS training and LESS skill than a manual.

This is the main issue, automatic or manual, most 'new' drivers are horrendous. In fact even some 'old' drivers like my mother are terrible but this has little to do with technology.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X