Many bugs in 3.08

on what servers do you guys play? Local or International? Thanks for letting me know :)

Dear miss Niccia

If I ever find you playing on local emulator servers I will take a checkers trolley and ram it into your ankles! :mad:

Come join us on official EU servers. Our guild has quite a few girlfriends/wives playing (since they gave up on arguing with us :p)
 
Dear miss Niccia

If I ever find you playing on local emulator servers I will take a checkers trolley and ram it into your ankles! :mad:

Come join us on official EU servers. Our guild has quite a few girlfriends/wives playing (since they gave up on arguing with us :p)

Agreed :)

For the druid tanks check out THIS with regards to expertise, dodge, and hit.
 
I am not just talking about bosses, but in general PVP and for sometimes tanking trash.

PvP players can't dodge from the rear,and classes like DK love parrying you while rogues and feral druids dodge a bit. I don't worry much about it tho,samelvl hit and expertise caps are easy to reach

As for tanking trash they arent bosslvl so their percentages are lower and probably wont parrygib you to death
 
Your comment was invalidated,thus avoidance > you

Expertise is not an avoidance stat. Any additional avoidance gained from it is secondary.
The primary focus of Expertise is in conjunction with Hit Rating to avoid not landing crucial attacks.
 
Expertise is not an avoidance stat. Any additional avoidance gained from it is secondary.
The primary focus of Expertise is in conjunction with Hit Rating to avoid not landing crucial attacks.

And i'll quote you
The only way in which Hit/Expertise ups your avoidance...

Decide whether avoidance is affected or not and confirm it so we can be sure where you're coming from
You are the one who said Expertise had no affect other than landing abilities,which inherently was incorrect as per your 2nd statement

Parry-gibbing is a real threat so do try to read up on it before thinking Expertise is only to land an attack and no,the argument "I/we/it/our mt does fine without it" doesn't mean its a useless stat or a threat stat only with a minute gain to avoidance
 
And i'll quote you


Decide whether avoidance is affected or not and confirm it so we can be sure where you're coming from
You are the one who said Expertise had no affect other than landing abilities,which inherently was incorrect as per your 2nd statement

Parry-gibbing is a real threat so do try to read up on it before thinking Expertise is only to land an attack and no,the argument "I/we/it/our mt does fine without it" doesn't mean its a useless stat or a threat stat only with a minute gain to avoidance

For a normal tank using 1H or 2H Parry gibbing is far down on your priority for gearing since you've got lots of ways of compensating.
Warriors/Paladins have shield block,etc Dk's have a much slower attack speed so they get parried less and Druids juts suck it up with their HP pool.

The primary reason for a 2H DK stacking Expertise is not for additional avoidance but to prevent not landing crucial attacks.
One of those is ANY Blood Rune ability because you want your Blood Runes on perma-cooldown so Blade Barrier is up for a much higher percentage of any fight.

To quote myself
Any additional avoidance gained from it is secondary.

Expertise is not an avoidance stat. The avoidance gained from it is only secondary.

Expertise only becomes an avoidance stat for DW DK's because they're attacking at a considerably faster rate. So fast that Parry Gibbing becomes a big concern for them.
 
Expertise only becomes an avoidance stat for DW DK's because they're attacking at a considerably faster rate. So fast that Parry Gibbing becomes a big concern for them.

Thanks for confirming that your earlier statement was incorrect,only if you were unparryable would it have been valid. Simple
 
Thanks for confirming that your earlier statement was incorrect,only if you were unparryable would it have been valid. Simple

Notice the bit were I say DW DK's?

Also, you conveniently choose to ignore the rest of my post.
 
Notice the bit were I say DW DK's?

Also, you conveniently choose to ignore the rest of my post.

Ofcourse,Hindsight being 20/20

Your post at 22-01-2009, 03:56 PM
Stated that Expertise has no effect

Anything stated thereafter,though more accurate,doesn't affect the fact that the original statement was wrong,i'm not disagreeing that it is more effective for DW DK's etc. Your statement at 22-01-2009, 03:56 PM was wrong,your elaboration is more correct. Go edit your post or continue to deny what you said by conveniently claiming i'm ignoring later posts ( which were clearly conflicting with said earlier post )

If you want a more thorough explanation do continue
 
Ofcourse,Hindsight being 20/20

Your post at 22-01-2009, 03:56 PM
Stated that Expertise has no effect

Anything stated thereafter,though more accurate,doesn't affect the fact that the original statement was wrong,i'm not disagreeing that it is more effective for DW DK's etc. Your statement at 22-01-2009, 03:56 PM was wrong,your elaboration is more correct. Go edit your post or continue to deny what you said by conveniently claiming i'm ignoring later posts ( which were clearly conflicting with said earlier post )

If you want a more thorough explanation do continue


Avoidance?
The only way in which Hit/Expertise ups your avoidance as a DK is ensuring that Blood abilities never miss so your Blade Barrier is up quicker.

You tell me where you see "no effect" there?
It would have been more accurate for me to say 2H DK thats about it.
 
You tell me where you see "no effect" there?
It would have been more accurate for me to say 2H DK thats about it.
define: only
# merely: and nothing more;
# entirely: without any others being included or involved;

The only way in which Hit/Expertise ups your avoidance...

Incorrect,allows attacks to land AND less boss-parry

Kinda mutually exclusive words


*edit Quote shortened to prevent W.O.T.
 
Last edited:
O geez, so because my other posts clarify that one better I'm still wrong?

Anal much?
 
Your statement at 22-01-2009, 03:56 PM was wrong,your elaboration is more correct. ( which were clearly conflicting with said earlier post )

O geez, so because my other posts clarify that one better I'm still wrong?

Conveniently ignoring much? You said 2 different things,instead of admitting and clearing it up you run off on a tangent without clarification

----------------
Now playing: Drowning Pool - Sinner - 02 - Bodies
via FoxyTunes
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X