The SA National Roads Agency Ltd (Sanral) has welcomed the support by the SA Chamber of Commerce and Industry for electronic tolling in Gauteng.
Sell-outs.
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
The SA National Roads Agency Ltd (Sanral) has welcomed the support by the SA Chamber of Commerce and Industry for electronic tolling in Gauteng.
Sell-outs.
Sell-outs.
Sell-outs.
Ya, problem is it's a lot harder for business to stand up to them. You make yourself a target and SANRAL will come down harder on companies than on masses of anonymous individuals.
Some of the prominent members of SACCI are Pfizer, Siemens, Nedbank, Microsoft SA, Denel, Eskom, Transnet, Safmarine.
I'm sure Eskom and Transnet are all for it, as for the multinationals, I don't see why they would care.
THE Opposition to Urban Tolling Alliance (Outa), which is locked in battle with the South African National Roads Agency (Sanral) and the government, is opening a new legal front in its campaign to frustrate e-tolls in Gauteng.
Outa chairman Wayne Duvenage said on Monday this would include co-ordinating support for the first court case to test the legality of nonpayment of toll fees.
The campaign, to be started in the "next week or so", includes providing a service to road users at R50-R60 a month that includes "a panic button and support line for if you get pulled over, along with a know-your-rights campaign ... a whole host of benefits will be rolled out".
"There will be a very focused strategy to empower people with support, including legal support in a court intervention as well as civil courage campaign to not tag-up and not to pay e-tolls."
Outa needs to raise about R2m to support the first test case and this would mean the alliance would need about 15,000 people to set up a monthly debit order of about R60, raising the necessary funds within a year.
Last week, Transport Minister Dipuo Peters said e-tolls would go live on December 3, two-and-a-half years later than first announced.
On Monday, law firm Findlay & Niemeyer offered to conduct a test case defence for one of the first noncompliant e-toll road users. Mr Duvenage said another, still unnamed, law firm would also be part of the support Outa was helping to co-ordinate.
Senior partner John Price said his firm would defend the test case to "promote and enforce" section 217(1) of the constitution, which "requires the government to contract for a system (in this case, the tolls) that was ‘fair, equitable, transparent, competitive and cost effective’".
Mr Duvenage said Outa had been working with Mr Price and another firm of attorneys to co-ordinate the information from Outa’s thwarted legal challenges.
"It is not over by a long way," he said. "Outa is busy forming its strategy … we have an extremely strong case. Remember the lawfulness argument has not been heard — the Supreme Court of Appeal was very clear that that matter needed to be addressed at the appropriate time and they were not going to address it in the review process."
Outa lost its appeal application when the court ruled on the technicality that Outa had taken longer than six months to object to the programme as provided for under the law.
Responding to the news of possible legal challenges, Sanral spokesman Vusi Mona said anyone wanting to set a judicial precedent by challenging the enforcement of e-tolls was "welcome". Sanral was "confident we have done everything by the book" and already had three court rulings in its favour.
The enforcement of e-tolls would first be administered by Sanral’s own debt collection system — through a series of infringement notices coupled with discount incentives for payment, Mr Mona said.
Justice Project South Africa chairman Howard Dembovsky said Sanral was using the Criminal Procedure Act to "threaten people with being criminals if they don’t pay".
One has to wonder if SANRAL is going to jump on this and remind us all of their “less than 1% will pay more than R100” number. Being the spin-master that he is, Vusi Mona should be able to demonise OUTA quite easily.http://www.bdlive.co.za/business/transport/2013/11/26/outa-to-open-new-front-in-battle-on-gauteng-e-tollsThe campaign, to be started in the "next week or so", includes providing a service to road users at R50-R60 a month that includes "a panic button and support line for if you get pulled over, along with a know-your-rights campaign ... a whole host of benefits will be rolled out".
Take a look at the oft-repeated assertion that e-tolling will cost you an arm and a leg. Respected economist Azar Jammine of Econometrix did the sums: the drain on total private consumption expenditure will be about 0.1% — that is, R1 for every R1,000. For those in Gauteng, it will automatically be higher — at 0.3%, or R3 for R1,000 spent. Mr Jammine is not a great fan of e-tolling but even he acknowledges the effect will not be that significant.
There is also a cap of R450 a month and it has been calculated that less than 1% of road users will pay that sum. Almost 83% of all road users will have to pay less than R100.
These are the simple facts about e-tolling. The rest that you, the ordinary road user, have heard or read is so over the top you can safely ignore it.
When e-tolling kicks in, you will be surprised at how little your pocket has been affected — and wonder what the fuss and noise was all about.
One has to wonder if SANRAL is going to jump on this and remind us all of their “less than 1% will pay more than R100” number. Being the spin-master that he is, Vusi Mona should be able to demonise OUTA quite easily.
And in other news, SANRAL really can’t see what all the fuss is about:
Motorists will find e-tolls fuss was storm in a teacup
(some highlights)
Using the truck numbers with a 100% compliance by trucks, how does the total monthly income split look between the cost brackets?So let's have a look at this based on their current financial statements, without understating their expenditure, and including revenue generated from trucks which I excluded from my previous calculations. They currently operate on a 35% operational profit margin. So let's extrapolate that into their costs going forward, while including revenue from trucks, assuming 100% compliance with trucks, and scenarios based on lower compliance levels with private cars:...